Sentences with phrase «about model accuracy»

3) Yes, some statements were made that say that a «pause» of more than 15 years might be reason to worry about model accuracy.

Not exact matches

Early tests of the model showed that it was able to estimate pain levels with about 80 % degree of accuracy, which means that the system is learning.
Sadilek can also feed in any existing information about the person's whereabouts to help improve the model's accuracy.
The artist spent about three months studying a living pregnant model and going through anatomical books, photographs and drawings, in order to achieve accuracy.
The impression one gets from the literature is unfortunately quite wrong about the accuracy of these models.
What I'm most curious about is the model's accuracy given EXACT data.
Wouldn't it be better if we put our efforts on accurate shorter term temperature projections, say what will happen in 6 months no more than a few years from now, check the models and brag about their accuracy or correct their failures, if the models are continuously correct all contrarian arguments die.
Interestingly, the Europeans rely on our satellite data as an input for their models, so if we lose satellite data for a while, as the GAO is worried about (see: / / www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-47) it would reduce their accuracy as well as ours.
Therefore I am a little skeptic about climate models, where a lot of physics and feedbacks are not even known to any accuracy...
There is, however, a point to be made about exercising caution when evaluating the forward - looking output of a computer model, particularly when those models are used to advocate policy changes on the assumption that the computer model accurately simulates the earth's climate, and more particularly when there is no demonstrable track record of the predictive accuracy of the model.
If you want me to discuss with you your judgement about the accuracy of the regional models, then you sure need to be more accurate regarding that criteria.
Anyone can see from reading the comment from Mark B and your response that the two of you were talking about the level of accuracy of a +4 C «forecast» using your little model, which you included in your poster as chart # 7.
[2] These uncertainties limit forecast model accuracy to about six days into the future.
While the climate science community may be interested in only the latest and greatest models, the rest of the world cares about your track record for accuracy.
My point about the technicality is that I understand your take on the attribution of accuracy of the models.
For example, the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo allowed modellers to test the accuracy of models by feeding in the data about the eruption.
The difference between a huge impact for NYC and what actually happened was a difference of about 25 km in the storm track, which is not a level of accuracy that you can expect from a weather forecast model.
In Part 2, we'll examine what Michaels» presentation to Congress should have looked like, had it been accurate, and what this tells us about the accuracy of Hansen's climate model and real - world climate sensitivity.
The fact that the scientists go to all this fuss and bother tells you scientist's care very much about the accuracy of their models.
Consistent with the previous analyses at Skeptical Science, RFC12 finds that the climate models used in the IPCC 2001 Third Assessment Report (TAR) and 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) predicted the ensuing global surface warming to a high degree of accuracy, while their central sea level rise predictions were too low by about 60 %.
«Physically valid» means CIs that convey predictive accuracy, rather than just precision about a modeled mean.
As the argument degenerates on my side due to my increasing frustration at the ludicrous resistance I'm receiving from the RC person, they will refine their argument, move goalposts, argue over the precision and accuracy of my forecast, yabba on about how all orbital models of the inner solar system are wrong due to GIGO (which is rather ironic), and so forth.
It took AutoML about 24 hours (18 minutes, in a less accurate Basic mode) to finish training the data, and the model was able to predict which shop the ramen came from with a 95 percent accuracy.
Parenting style added 2 — 6 % and support for PA about 1 % to model accuracy.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z