Using paleoclimate as a grab bag of random, misunderstood factoids to back up wacky ideas
about modern climate change is not a good policy.
However, these findings are not relevant to any debates
about modern climate change.
How much this tells anybody
about modern climate change is open to debate.
However, these findings are not relevant to any debates
about modern climate change.
Not exact matches
I confess that I have become somewhat blasé
about the range of exciting — I think revolutionary is probably more accurate — technologies that we are rolling out today: our work in genomics and its translation into varieties that are reaching poor farmers today; our innovative integration of long — term and multilocation trials with crop models and
modern IT and communications technology to reach farmers in ways we never even imagined five years ago; our vision to create a C4 rice and see to it that Golden Rice reaches poor and hungry children; maintaining productivity gains in the face of dynamic pests and pathogens; understanding the nature of the rice grain and what makes for good quality; our many efforts to
change the way rice is grown to meet the challenges of
changing rural economies,
changing societies, and a
changing climate; and, our extraordinary array of partnerships that has placed us at the forefront of the CGIAR
change process through the Global Rice Science Partnership.
To the horror of anyone concerned
about climate change,
modern miners want to set fire to these deep coal seams and capture the gases this creates for industry and power generation.
As greenhouse gases have piled up in the atmosphere,
climate change has shifted from being a theory
about a future threat to a hazardous fact of
modern life.
By comparing the bones of
modern whales to fossils, a team of scientists has traced the growth spurt to
about 4.5 million years ago, when
climate change increased the food supply.
For my
Modern World History class, I adapted an argumentative writing task
about climate change to ask students «How is
climate change affecting people around the world?».
In June the group occupied Tate
Modern's Turbine Hall for 25 hours and scrawled words of warning
about climate change across the floor in charcoal.
What I find ironic is that it is his can - do optimism that is in this case working against our ability to do something
about our dependence on fossil fuels and the
climate change that this dependence is resulting in, that is, switching to alternate energy, preserving
modern civilization and the world economy beyond Peak Oil and Peak Coal, preventing
climate change from becoming such a huge problem that it destroys that the world economy — and more than likely leads to a series of highly destructive wars over limited resources.
Warn us that
climate change is destroying our planet, and only a small part of our prefrontal cortex (which worries
about the future) will glimmer; then we'll go back to worrying
about snakes or their
modern equivalent — terrorists.
Goreham's session was summarized in the NEPPA conference material as offering «a discussion
about energy, electricity and
modern society, with common sense
about climate change, public policy, and implications for the power industry.»
Building Knowledge to Reduce Uncertainties — Landscape - scale restoration projects like 4FRI present the opportunity to learn
about the influence of accelerated thinning on forest water budgets and resilience using
modern forestry techniques and under a
changing and variable
climate.
In part, they attribute this lack of coverage to a
modern media environment where very few stories can survive more than a few 24 - hour news cycles, which is «prohibitive for raising awareness
about slowly growing threats such as
climate change.»
As the Post noted («Study Confirms Past Few Decades Warmest on Record», June 2, 2006 [link]-RRB-, the academy study backed up the conclusions my colleagues and I reached more than a decade ago
about the unprecedented nature of
modern climate change.
Our analysis is based on
about equal parts of information gleaned from paleoclimate studies,
climate modeling, and
modern observations of ongoing
climate changes.
«The
climate has always
changed and it always will — there is nothing unusual
about the
modern magnitudes or rates of
change of temperature, of ice volume, of sea level or of extreme weather events,» Mr Carter added.
If «
climate change» alarmists were serious
about catastrophies, then the focus would be on preparing for a solar coronal mass ejection (CME) which would destroy most electrical / electronic systems in its path, wiping out
modern civilization in that hemisphere.
Worldview 3 Something unusual * MUST * have happened
about 1000 years ago (beyond the range of borehole analysis)-- perhaps a Medieval Warm Period — that invalidates
modern climate -
change science.
It goes deeper, and provides more information on the fact that
modern day meat consumption is the leading cause of environmental destruction and human induced
climate change on our planet, yet we never hear
about it.
In his new book, Why We Disagree
About Climate Change, he explores how the issue of climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern po
Climate Change, he explores how the issue of climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern pol
Change, he explores how the issue of
climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern po
climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern pol
change has come to be such a dominant issue in
modern politics.
In short,
climate always
changes and it is very difficult to see why some people get so excited
about the
modern era of warming
A typical
modern, utility - scale, wind turbine will generate
about as much clean electricity as 2000 average roof - top solar installations (around 2012, see here), so you would think that people who want action on
climate change would support wind power.
Modern predictive models require data
about the specific mechanisms of
change too, in order to better project the response to
climate change.
However, if there are any «lessons» to be learned from archaeology, these are not
about «if» or «how» particular human groups adapted to
climate change events or developments at a specific place and time in the past; such an emphasis would fail to recognise the unique nature of
modern climate change.
(Read much more
about this in my survey of
modern climate skepticism, Do Climate Skeptics Change Their
climate skepticism, Do
Climate Skeptics Change Their
Climate Skeptics
Change Their Minds?)
Reading the Sierra Club report, I'm inclined to think the risk is less that policy makers will follow its recommendations and more that it will be viewed as evidence that those who care
about climate change in rich countries are trying to stop poor countries from developing
modern, high - energy lives.
In what Batir Wardam of Arab Environment Watch called «an unprecedented expression from an Arab official using [a]
modern social media tool,» Jordanian Environment Minister Khalid Irani used this year's Blog Action Day as an opportunity to speak out
about climate change on a popular local website.