Yet we now know
about nuclear energy policy; shale gas exploration; grammar schools; housing plans; a race equality audit.
Not exact matches
Energy: Alan Duncan should be commended for forcing the party to abandon its «nuclear energy is a last resort» policy but there's little sense of urgency from the party leadership about Britain's looming energy c
Energy: Alan Duncan should be commended for forcing the party to abandon its «
nuclear energy is a last resort» policy but there's little sense of urgency from the party leadership about Britain's looming energy c
energy is a last resort»
policy but there's little sense of urgency from the party leadership
about Britain's looming
energy c
energy crisis.
Concerns
about global warming and oil's imminent demise have caused scientists and
policy - makers to look for solutions in both the future and the past: to new technologies such as
nuclear fusion, multijunction photovoltaics, and fuel cells — and to traditional
energy sources such as water power, wind power, and (sustainable) biomass cultivation (coupled with clean and
energy - efficient combustion).
Lomborg claims in his rebuttal that «Holdren could find little but a badly translated word and a necessary specification for
nuclear energy production in this chapter».8 Actually, as my original critique indicated to the extent practical in the space available, and as Lomborgs rebuttal and this response make even plainer, his
energy chapter is so permeated with misunderstandings, misreadings, misrepresentations, and blunders of other sorts that it can not be considered a positive contribution to public or
policy - maker understanding, notwithstanding its managing to get right a few (already well known) truths
about the subject.
Among those who care
about cutting the chances that humans will propel sustained and disruptive changes in the climate and oceans, this reality still tends to result in two mindsets: Raise public will to accelerate deployment of today's relatively costly non-polluting
energy choices (both renewable and
nuclear) or press for intensified and sustained investments and
policies that can spur
energy innovation.
Cheap natural gas, stagnant power demand, and power prices that have fallen significantly since 2008 have jeopardized the economics of
about two - thirds of the nation's 100 - GW
nuclear capacity, according to a working paper from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Center for
Energy and Environmental
Policy Research.
German
policy leaders have talked
about a transition away from fossil fuels and
nuclear energy — an Energiewende — since the 1980s.
The US President made a point
about economic leadership in the second debate, one Mitt Romney did not oppose: America's environmental and
energy policy is determined by the oil industry; it's future is in wind, solar and
nuclear.
Someone could be
policy neutral because they have no particular convictions
about how addressing climate change should be done:
nuclear energy, CO2 sequestration, drastic lifestyle changes, combinations of approaches, etc..
As arguments
about climate change rage, it's becoming increasingly common for
policy makers to tout «clean»
nuclear energy as the only viable alternative to fossil fuels.
«We are deeply concerned
about South Korea's future
energy policy as well as its plan to phase out
nuclear reactors.
The Obama Administration has been pretty upfront
about its support for an
energy policy that promotes both clean
energy technologies and renewed investment in old technologies such as
nuclear, coal and offshore drilling.