The thing
about nuclear waste is that it's the only waste from electricity production that is safely contained anywhere.
Given the evident concern
about nuclear waste, it will be interesting to see if there is any reactions from young people to the governments recent admission that, on current NDA plans, the proposed Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) is not expected to be available to take spent fuel from new nuclear power stations until around 2130, which they note «is approximately 50 years after the likely end of electricity generation for the first new nuclear power station».
A Lacis: by the time we have to worry about oxygen levels we will be out of fossil fuels and unless we invent a battery we will be worrying
about nuclear waste and learning Tibetan as sea level rises.
The promise of fusion eliminates the need to burn fossil fuels, accumulate greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, warm the Earth, and worry
about nuclear waste — instead, providing clean energy that uses ordinary seawater as a fuel.
But finding an alternate solution could take years, and some observers concerned
about nuclear waste's effects on human health do not want to plunge ahead in the meantime.
Yucca Mountain and how our politics is changing that whole scene there
about nuclear wastes storage.
Not exact matches
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just
wasted 30 minutes telling the world what we already knew
about Iran's quest for a
nuclear weapon.
But in this Gilead, Atwood has imagined a time when our nightmares
about the perils of toxic
waste, radioactive fallout, chemical and biological warfare,
nuclear sabotage and the building
When I first found that the high level radioactive
waste was lethal for 240,000 years, it changed my mind
about nuclear power.
The recent accident at the Fukushima
nuclear power plant reinforces the need for renewed thinking
about nuclear -
waste storage and disposal.
Public concerns
about nuclear power have traditionally centered on two issues: the risk of widespread radioactive fallout from an accident and the hazards of
nuclear waste.
Studying such compounds in the lab also helps computational researchers to improve their predictions
about the more highly radioactive elements present in
nuclear waste that are even more difficult to study.
«With a scaled up solution, not only will we no longer have to think
about the dangers of storing radioactive
waste long - term, but we will have a viable solution to close the
nuclear fuel cycle and contribute to solving the world's energy needs.
Cortez Masto, a Democrat who voted for Perry, said she received assurances in private meetings that he would listen to her concerns
about advancing the now - stalled Yucca Mountain
nuclear waste repository in her home state of Nevada.
In particular, a relatively new form of
nuclear technology could overcome the principal drawbacks of current methods — namely, worries
about reactor accidents, the potential for diversion of
nuclear fuel into highly destructive weapons, the management of dangerous, long - lived radioactive
waste, and the depletion of global reserves of economically available uranium.
The report is neutral
about nuclear power because of issues with
nuclear waste, safety, proliferation and public image.
And his cautious comments on reopening the Yucca Mountain
nuclear waste repository in Nevada reflected his understanding that there are deep divisions within Republican ranks
about its fate, along with the fact that the ultimate decision is above his pay grade.
Norway and Sweden are worried
about the threat posed by radioactive leaks from sunken
nuclear - powered submarines and
nuclear waste off the Kola Peninsula, as well as the safety of the
nuclear plants there.
The idea remains that fast reactors, which get their name because the neutrons that initiate fission in the reactor are zipping
about faster than those in a conventional reactor, could offer a speedy solution to cleaning some nasty
nuclear waste, which fissions better with fast neutrons, while also providing electricity as a by - product.
In 2002 [President] George W. Bush approved Nevada's Yucca Mountain [
about 160 kilometers northwest of Las Vegas] as the site, and to move
nuclear waste there.
Perry also fielded numerous questions
about his plans for the moribund and politically sensitive Yucca Mountain
nuclear waste repository in Nevada.
Then on June 21, 2016, after technicians working in a glove box spilled
about 7 tablespoons of a liquid containing plutonium, workers violated safety rules by sopping up the spill with organic cheesecloth and throwing it in
waste bins with other
nuclear materials, according to an internal Los Alamos report.
In a similar vein, he made vague but conciliatory comments
about trying to find a way forward on two other long - standing
nuclear waste issues: the cleanup of Cold War — related
waste at the Hanford Site in Washington state, and the stalled construction of a plant in South Carolina designed to turn some 68 tons of plutonium scavenged from U.S. and Russian
nuclear weapons into so - called mixed oxide fuel (MOX).
The failure to address WIPP's shortcomings does not build confidence that shipping high - level
nuclear waste with
about 1,000 times more radioactivity than WIPP is approved to handle would be safe now and for thousands of generations that the
wastes are hazardous.
The program ensures effective citizen involvement in decisions
about the future of the
nuclear weapons complex relative to stopping approval of new production facilities and promoting disarmament and safer
waste management and disposal at Department of Energy (DOE) sites.
I have studied this issue carefully, mindful of how important
nuclear power is to Connecticut, and of how concerned Connecticut families are
about the health and safety effects of storing
nuclear waste on site.
Thus, WIPP's mission has been to demonstrate whether the federal government and its contractors, at the cost of unknown billions of dollars can: (1) safely operate WIPP to meet the «start clean, stay clean» standard; (2) safely transport plutonium - contaminated
waste through more than 20 states without serious accidents or release of radioactive or hazardous contaminants; (3) meet commitments to clean up transuranic
waste at
about 20 DOE
nuclear weapons sites; and (4) safely close, decontaminate, and decommission the WIPP site, beginning in 2030 or sooner.
In response to the Obama Administration's «Blue Ribbon Commission on America's
Nuclear Future,» SRIC submitted various reports, participated in three meetings, and has provided information about WIPP and nuclear waste storage and disposal policies to the public, policymakers, and the
Nuclear Future,» SRIC submitted various reports, participated in three meetings, and has provided information
about WIPP and
nuclear waste storage and disposal policies to the public, policymakers, and the
nuclear waste storage and disposal policies to the public, policymakers, and the media.
Nuclear power faces persistent concerns about safety, nuclear waste, and potential weapons proliferation, despite past contributions to mortality prevention and climate change mitigation
Nuclear power faces persistent concerns
about safety,
nuclear waste, and potential weapons proliferation, despite past contributions to mortality prevention and climate change mitigation
nuclear waste, and potential weapons proliferation, despite past contributions to mortality prevention and climate change mitigation [232].
And he's excited
about the prospect of getting GE's first PRISM Reactor built on a commercial scale because, he says, it sidesteps many of the complications associated with
nuclear energy — like the
waste problem.
If this implies to you that the movie has anything resembling a political agenda
about the billions of dollars our country
wastes on
nuclear weapons, think again; if anything this movie, like so many other American romps, leaves us with the impression that American
nuclear weapons are essential to our well - being, for where would American action thrillers be without them?
This game was inspired by an article a friend shared with me (http://bit.ly/1uPFFi7)
about constructing a
nuclear waste disposal site such that it will be left undisturbed for 10,000 years.
Of course, the barriers to a fast expansion of the world's
nuclear power plants, whether for electricity or fuel manufacturing, remain daunting — including everything from the lack of permanent
waste - disposal options to tough financing and persistent public concerns
about safety.
Douglas Wise # 331 — That's very interesting information
about the new generation (4th) of
nuclear power, which can run on
waste heat.
When I was little every week I saw a movie
about how
nuclear war or
waste would cause people to shrink (or enlarge).
I've read reports in the past
about the huge cost to both the UK and US
about the cost of decommissioning plants let alone the
nuclear waste or security.
Fossil fuels aside, GCF - watchers must remain hyper - vigilant
about the GCF funding false solutions like so - called climate smart agriculture, biofuels,
waste incineration,
nuclear energy and big dams.
Of course, different people have different perspectives on the issue of
nuclear waste, but it needs to be considered if we're talking
about the feasibility of
nuclear.
Subjects holding hierarchical and individualistic outlooks, on the one hand, and ones holding egalitarian and communitarian outlooks, click me for a closer look!on the other, significantly disagreed
about the state of expert opinion on climate change,
nuclear waste disposal, and handgun regulation.
Versus # 16 billion for 3.2 GW of
nuclear and a whole load of uncertainty
about waste the taxpayer appears to be responsible for.
Serious concerns
about the safety, cost, and
waste issues associated with
nuclear power remain, and demand continuing scrutiny.
There is, of course, an argument to be made
about the lasting benefit of the home improvement vs the inevitable decommissioning and
waste disposal costs of
nuclear.
It is telling that while there are thousands of articles, studies, books and movies
about the relatively miniscule quantities of well - managed spent fuel that comes out of
nuclear plants, there is to date only one estimate of how much solar
waste the world is on track to produce, and it was calculated for the first time by an 18 - year - old
nuclear engineering student from UC Berkeley and (proudly) published yesterday by Environmental Progress.
But Obama's announcement set up a clash with environmentalists who remain worried
about the safety of
nuclear power and
waste disposal.
Greg Dalton: Let's talk
about the
waste, Michael Shellenberger,
nuclear waste this country doesn't have a good solution.
If you take all of the
waste that
nuclear power the United States has produced since we began producing power from
nuclear, it would all fit on a football field,
about 50 or 60 feet high.
Nuclear power faces persistent concerns about safety, nuclear waste, and potential weapons proliferation, despite past contributions to mortality prevention and climate change mitigation
Nuclear power faces persistent concerns
about safety,
nuclear waste, and potential weapons proliferation, despite past contributions to mortality prevention and climate change mitigation
nuclear waste, and potential weapons proliferation, despite past contributions to mortality prevention and climate change mitigation [232].
«In 2016 the European Commission assessed that European Union's
nuclear decommissioning liabilities were seriously underfunded by
about 118 billion euros, with only 150 billion euros of earmarked assets to cover 268 billion euros of expected decommissioning costs covering both dismantling of
nuclear plants and storage of radioactive parts and
waste.»
Apart from the costs there are ethical arguments; the way
nuclear power is used at present
about 1 % of the available energy in the uranium is used and the remaining 99 % goes out with the
waste.
For my part, I have no problem with
nuclear power, but we have to seriously rethink how we go
about handling and processing spent fuel, i.e. recycling it more effectively, to reduce the
waste and possibility of contamination as much as possible.