Whatever you think
about obscenity law, this opinion is pretty clearly inconsistent with existing doctrine.
Rather than being used as a way to tar the judge, doesn't this just raise questions
about obscenity laws in the first place?»
Not exact matches
I bought legal textbooks
about obscenity, flag burning, protesting, separation of church and state, the Southern Poverty
Law Center.
The three panelists talked mostly
about obscenity prosecutions, federal record - keeping requirements and zoning
laws.
Adult - entertainment
law is not just
about obscenity and free speech, but also
about zoning, labor
law, record - keeping and who knows what else.
How would I feel
about a client seeing me breaking bread with the same prosecutor or cop who is trying to get my client locked up, particularly in instances where I feel the prosecution is based on false evidence, an effort to obtain a disproportionately severe sentence, or a
law that I feel should be stricken or heavily decriminalized in the first place (e.g., I want the legalization of marijuana, prostitution, gambling, criminal libel and
obscenity and the heavy decriminalization of all other drugs)?