«When people were thinking
about ocean chemistry, it was always centered on hydrothermal flow, but there was little data,» Johnson says.
Not exact matches
«In a future mission, we could fly through those plumes and tell a lot
about the
chemistry and nature of the surface» and possibly a liquid
ocean below, Bob Pappalardo, a planetary scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory who wasn't involved in the work, told Business Insider — all without having to drill through the moon's miles - thick ice shell.
«Our work pinpoints the time when the
ocean began accumulating oxygen at levels that would substantially change the
ocean's
chemistry and it's
about 250 million years earlier than what we knew for the atmosphere.
As the LRAUVs move through the
ocean, they collect information
about water temperature,
chemistry, and chlorophyll (an indicator of microscopic algae) and send this data to scientists on shore or on a nearby ship.
At 3 p.m. on Thursday, join Florida State University geochemist William Burnett to chat
about how radiation can affect
ocean chemistry and its possible effects on marine ecology.
The location and amounts of iron in the rock gave important clues
about ancient
ocean water
chemistries over time.
The last time the
oceans endured such a drastic change in
chemistry was 65 million years ago, at
about the same time the dinosaurs went extinct.
What do you KNOW
about physics,
chemistry and biology of
Oceans?
Have you ever heard
about Ocean - acidification and the following impact on
chemistry and finally biology of the
Oceans?
Hales» pioneering research in
ocean carbon
chemistry underlies much of what we know
about the role carbon dioxide from fossil fuel emissions plays in changing the
chemistry of Northwest seas.
I know nothing
about this issue, but I just came across a reference to Jacobson, Mark Z., «Studying
ocean acidification with conservative, stable numerical schemes for nonequilibrium air -
ocean exchange and
ocean equilibrium
chemistry.»
There is no surprise that the CO2 in the atmosphere winds up partially in the
oceans, nor that the amount of CO2 going into or coming out of the
oceans varies in time and space — that's simple equilibrium
chemistry between the liquid (that is, dissolved) and gaseous phases, and does explain part of the variability
about the long term rising trend.
Measurements of 13C / 12C on corals and sponges — whose carbonate shells reflect the
ocean chemistry just as tree rings record the atmospheric
chemistry — show that this decline began
about the same time as in the atmosphere; that is, when human CO2 production began to accelerate in earnest.
I do certainly agree that
ocean chemistry and pH is not only
about CO2 but very much
about buffering where carbonate supply is essential.
As long as I have tried to learn
about ocean acidification I've been surprised by the scarcity of direct data on the changes in pH and
ocean chemistry more generally.
I was reminded that what frightens me most
about climate change — which will by itself cook forests, kill thousands of species, and alter the
chemistry of the
oceans — are the famines, mass migrations, and wars that could follow.
The audience for whom this piece is intended consists of people who know some
chemistry and are uncertain
about how to consider the often made claim by deniers that the
oceans contain so much dissolved carbon that human production is inconsequential.
-- Susan Solomon, Nature The Long Thaw is written for anyone who wishes to know what cutting - edge science tells us
about the modern issue of global warming and its effects on the pathways of atmospheric
chemistry, as well as global and regional temperatures, rainfall, sea level, Arctic sea - ice coverage, melting of the continental ice sheets, cyclonic storm frequency and intensity and
ocean acidification.
Although the technologies are still nascent, the idea that humans might help remove carbon from the skies as well as put it there is a reasonable Anthropocene expectation; it wouldn't stop climate change any time soon, but it might shorten its lease, and reduce the changes in
ocean chemistry that excess carbon brings
about.
Therefore
about half of mans CO2 goes into the atmosphere, nature has a slight protecting effect by absorbing the other half for us, but this is damaging the
chemistry of the
oceans.
I looked into this after your post
about a year ago on the Argo float temperatures and how the
ocean generally does not heat above 30 degrees C. My knowledge of
chemistry is limited; but, I noted these things: Carbon dioxide as well as other gasses in water act like a liquid.
If you knew anything
about geology or
chemistry you would know that an increase in the concentration of CO2 in the world's
oceans makes the
oceans acidic, which will eventually make the
oceans uninhabitable by certain organisms whose niche is within the natural pH of the
oceans.
Researchers and scientists have been scrambling to obtain baseline information
about changing
ocean chemistry for the past several years.
As our
ocean chemistry continues to change, we will educate decision makers about ocean acidification and encourage the planting Ocean Friendly Gardens to create «living soils» that trap carbon and reduce nutrient ru
ocean chemistry continues to change, we will educate decision makers
about ocean acidification and encourage the planting Ocean Friendly Gardens to create «living soils» that trap carbon and reduce nutrient ru
ocean acidification and encourage the planting
Ocean Friendly Gardens to create «living soils» that trap carbon and reduce nutrient ru
Ocean Friendly Gardens to create «living soils» that trap carbon and reduce nutrient runoff.
CO2 changes by
about 10 - 15 ppm per degree C from outgassing, as we see since the last Ice Age, and it is largely the
ocean chemistry that explains this magnitude.
And talk
about the invisible things that we're doing, that shift in the
chemistry of the
oceans is completely invisible but very consequential in the long run.
In their statement, the scientific academies say the
oceans have absorbed
about a quarter of the carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere by human activities since the industrial revolution, resulting in rapid and irreversible changes in
ocean chemistry.
The science of
ocean chemistry tells us much more
about carbon in the atmosphere and water.
the real accuracy of the historical data, which may have been too variable because of place, time and method and too inaccurate to conclude anything
about a (theoretical, but based on
ocean chemistry) trend of 0.1 pH unit over a century...
All the screaming
about methane is distracting attention from the CO2 problem — which is screwing up the
oceans»
chemistry even faster than it's screwing up the climate.