Sentences with phrase «about other couple»

The book includes multiple case studies and stories about other couple's experiences.

Many marriages have survived an affair and reading about other couples» success stories can offer guidance.

We provide plenty of room, so you don't have to worry about the other couples overhearing you.

Not exact matches

When a relationship hits a serious stage and couples get married or commit to each other in some big way, people are often too overcome with excitement or too overwhelmed by the prospect of spending forever with this person to have a deep discussion about where their priorities lie.

30 minutes later he came up to me and told me he was thinking about our discussion and I have a couple of other ideas for you.

When we had Cisco doing their innovation centres here, one of five in the world, recently we had a couple of other global companies that have come here, they talk about that as being an important consideration.

I was talking to an analyst about apparel in the athletic space in the U.S., and we were talking about Nike, Under Armour, Lululemon and a couple of other brands.

While other couples we knew spent their honeymoons arguing about directions and which side of the road to drive on, my husband and I were enjoying a boat trip through the Balearic Sea in peace and quiet.

About 20 percent of all extra-pair copulations ended with the dominant male rushing the couple, trying to bite them and showing other acts of aggression.

If everyone is professional about it, shouldn't two consenting adults be able to couple up as they please — even if one signs the other's paycheques?

A typical interview — unstructured, rambling, unfocused — tells the interviewer almost nothing about job candidates, other than how they seem during a couple of meetings in a conference room.

Did you let all that talk about «Mobilegeddon» go in one ear and out of the other over the last couple of weeks?

With any other start - up, going from zero to a couple hundred million in sales in your first two years would be nothing short of a miracle — but here it's about getting to a billion, very fast.

As a relatively new technology, HFT isn't yet regulated to the same extent as other forms of trading, and in the past couple of years, both the head of the SEC in the US, and the FCA here in Britain, have expressed concerns about the industry.

So in the last couple of weeks I was thinking a lot about other investment alternatives, besides just dividend paying companies.

There are plenty of other opportunities for building links (like, building relationships), and for the past couple of months we're hearing only negativity about guest blogging.

As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weakness.

I had Harvey Panesar at my door the other evening and there were a couple of concerns that came about in how he was comparing himself with other candidates for this ward.

Accordingly, a year - over-year increase in new claims of about 20 % (which would currently equate to a level of about 340,000 weekly new claims) would create a significant concern of a new recession in progress, particularly if coupled with other evidence such as equity market weakness and slowing growth in real personal income.

It breaks down to living expenses on 1 check and debt on other with a little bit left over for my 401k, which has about 15k or so in it after the hit i took from being laid off and losing the unvested employer match in the middle of our economic implosion a couple years ago.

You and every other bloke who opens up an online brokerage account and reads a couple of books about «how to get rich in the stock market».

And as I thought about it I realized that it would fit on the EP, because there were a couple of other songs that were equally heavy - handed and sort of direct declarative statements.

But my question is this, if being gay isn't about sex, then a «gay» couple would have no problem abstaining from any sexual act and just love the hell out of each other.

And as for your silly statement about the gay couple having no problem abstaining from sex... if you believe what you are trying to imply... then your relationship with your spouse or significant other (if you have one) is not about love but rather simply about sex.

But my question is this, if being straight isn't about sex, then a «straight» couple would have no problem abstaining from any sexual act and just love the hell out of each other.

They seem to be mostly about priest abusing little boys, Westboro Baptists saying God hates the families of fallen soldiers, politicians deciding that women now need two (not just one) unnecessary medical procedure before they can be allowed to make decisions about their bodies, and Christians telling couples who want to legally commit their lives to each other that they aren't allowed to do that.

In other words, between two of the most prominent ex-gay books of the 1990s, you got about a couple of blog posts worth of discussion of celibacy, almost none of it directed to practical problems celibates face.

Yes, a couple of the pledges are designed to strengthen the instutition, but many of them are about praying for others, supporting those whom God has called to lead and I believe a major theme of the book is discoving.

I did also want to point out a couple of other books by L.M. Montgomery you might not have heard about but feature excellent heroines: Emily of New Moon (who was Madeleine L'Engle's favourite) and Jane of Lantern Hill.

We could go on and provide numerous similar examples, not just from the writings of John, but from other New Testament authors as well, but we have seen from just a couple of examples that present participles in connection with perfect tense verbs do not clearly indicate anything about the timing of one compared to the other.

She and her fiance, «like just about every other betrothed couple in America... wanted our....

Colin... to be fair, I've never met any believer that was not terminally stupid, but you are right about Fred and a couple other posted here.

what do thoes media monkey ass's do, other than read what comes over the cable and distort it with their bravado, for a couple million dollars and sitting on their fat ass's and stockgobbing and laughing they earned their money and complaing about their taxes --

After a journalist wrote about having a «marriage sabbatical», the Christian founder of the Marriage Foundation tells Premier there's no hard and fast rule but he advises long periods apart can be damaging and that couples should invest in each other.

She and her fiance, «like just about every other betrothed couple in America... wanted our wedding to be «personal.

When I get a chance I'll write a couple of posts — One about the homeless and Jesus (some dislike churches and Christians, others are Jesus followers, but most like Jesus), and one about observations the homeless make to us about the people who show up on their turf to «minister» to them (whose attitudes range from condescension, which is very common, to love, which is very uncommon).

I am leaving aside too the questions of visitation, support, and other matters too numerous to talk about, not to mention the many cases decreeing which half of the couple must take the cat.

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

Another possible image candidate would show a couple of people (such as a married couple) who were about to tear each other to pieces until the minister raised his hands in a gesture of peace, so that the hostilities can begin to subside.

You've probably heard that married couples fight about money more than any other topic.

Delivering the Sermon: Voice, Body, and Animation in Proclamation by Teresa L. Fry Brown (a couple others that I haven't read yet but have heard great things about from this author are: Can a Sistah Get a Little Help?

If marriage is only for procreation then there are a whole slew of other considerations to make like what about hetero - couples choosing not to have kids or physically unable.

On the other hand, I have read the bible, a couple of times, being both a believer (when I read it the first time) and an atheist (when I read it about a year ago.

I don't know about this couple or any other people in this forum, but when people express that I'm not welcomed, I usually go my own way in the other direction.

You lost me when you got up and sang on Sunday morning about not judging other people until we walked a mile in their shoes — yet denied a gay couple a chance for a happy life together.

A couple of weeks ago, I engaged in an interesting conversation on Twitter with my friend Ben Moberg and several others about Christian leaders who hold their cards close when it comes to their positions on same - sex relationships and LGBT people.

I was talking about a couple of people who went after other commenters with venom.

They often include provisions about religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do in the case of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be in such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included in the relationship; what sexual practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what kinds of freedom each partner is to have.

Some couples don't get along in that area because one wants more sex and the other less, or they have different views about who should take the initiative, or they are just too mad at each other to enjoy sex, or one is interested in swinging and the other is not.

@ Bruce «A couple of things about belief and evidence for belief from the scriptures: (1) the gospel of John encourages us to believe based on the testimony of others who were «eyewitnesses» to key events»