It's all
about presenting things in a way that makes a person say, «I want that.»
Not exact matches
Second of all, if you lie
about the job, then the person starts working for you and sees that
things aren't the way you
presented them, you are going to lose them and they will go work for another company.
I once had to
present in front of a bunch of investors who had just heard from a Nobel Laureate who was trying to cure cancer, and I was up next talking
about funny
things on the internet.
Essentially it boils down to two
things: Know what you're talking
about, and
present it with personal authenticity.»
Be realistic
about financial estimates and projections: «When you
present a plan to bankers and financiers, or even to your employees, people will get way more excited
about what's real rather than some huge
thing that's never going to happen,» says Ciccarelli.
«Cash, though, is to a business as oxygen is to an individual: never thought
about when it is
present, the only
thing in mind when it is absent,» Buffett said.
(Steve Jobs and his team, who knew a
thing or two
about presenting, practiced this religiously.
While everyone is out there blogging
about gift guides for someone else, let's focus on the really important
things about Christmas: the
presents for you!
Darren Rowse @problogger Founder and Keynote Speaker at ProBlogger
Presenting: 10
Things I Wish I'd Known
about Blogging That Will Shortcut the Growth of Your Blog
Hello, for all who might have missed this piece of information: We have created our own Bitcoin Faucet Guide, in which we
present you with all of the most important
things to know
about the bitcoin faucets out there.
I'd say rather than try to invent wish fulfillment with myth and fairy tales
about the way we'd like
things to be, why not just find our contentment in our
present existence, make ours the best lives we can live and just enjoy the ride we have, rather than invent one to dream
about.
I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful
things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in
present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.
The themes in it [are] the ever -
present themes of adultery, as well as a pretty heavy drinking theme in the song (which probably comes from the fact that I drink pretty heavily), but the most interesting part of it to me, the
thing I was most excited
about when I wrote it was the bridge toward the end of the song where there's a car fire in the parking lot and all that stuff and the comment «what a cruel God we've got.»
In other words with all the
things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant
about the religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being
presented as the most important information people need to know at this particular time.
Both the liturgical and theological traditions of the Church
present to us certain
things that must be said
about God as revealed in Christ Jesus.
I agree with all the positive
things Travis LaCouter said yesterday
about Adam Greene's Bibliotheca Kickstarter campaign, an effort to
present a reader's edition of the Bible, stripped of all verse numbers and other annotations and bound in four handsome volumes, one for the Law, one for the Prophets, one for the Writings, and one for the New Testament.
Actually, my favorite
thing about church was playing / listening to music for the service and hanging out with friends and family.Fast forward to the
present... I haven't gone to church in years.
Of course, our fictions and even our serious thinking
about the terrestrial past or the astronomical
present are full of
things like fairies.
The fundamental question at stake, then, could not have been the scientific question of how
things achieved their
present form and by what processes, nor even the historical question
about time periods and chronological order.
We also have the ecclesiastical radicals who say critical
things about the
present form of the institutional church.
Then it was on to Portland, where I couldn't help but think of the Portlandia song, «The Dream of the 1890s is Alive in Portland,» when my gracious host Andy Campell, (who homebrews his own beer, of course)
presented me with AMAZING homemade bread from his wife April and began talking
about his friends who make their own soap and, you know, pickle
things.
At the
present and with this hot media publicity exposure only The King of KSA has the Holy Power if to do any
thing about for her getting a lower sentence or be released for deportation any where on Earth!!
And regardless of what you believe
about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will
present you with a new way of looking at
things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.
It seems the drum beat is all
about how bad the church is... how we need to listen to our accusers... could we not
present the accusations and discuss them one by one... rather than alluding to them and
things done so far in the past that to correct them is almost impossible.
the funny
thing is the «left» always talks
about SCIENCE and FACTS but whenever
presented with any the response is often like... «have you talked to them all?»
This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit
about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing
things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor
things present nor
things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,
So the principle that God uses language to tell us
things is at once established; and the claim that Scripture is a further case in point - a claim, be it said, that is irremoveably embedded at foundation level in Jesus» teaching
about his Messiahship and God's righteousness (1)--
presents no new conceptual problem.
Filled with realism
about the
present and a cautious hopefulness
about the future, this volume points the way forward by looking back to - in that apt expression - first
things.
It is to claim that for the purposes of addressing our three central issues
about theological schooling it is the decisively important mode in which the Christian
thing is
present.
In it I want to do three
things: firstly, to overview Roman Catholic positions on the spiritual soul, secondly to mention some of the reasons for the
present virtual silence
about the soul and, thirdly, to provide the beginning of a positive argument for the human soul.
Many classic carols came from creative Christian individuals; in 1848, Cecil Frances Alexander answered children's queries in poetry form — so when asked who made the world, she
presented «All
things bright and beautiful» and, when asked
about Jesus» birth, she gave them «Once in royal David's city».
In sum, because it treats belief as an atomistic decision taken piecemeal by individuals rather than a holistic response to family life, Nietzsche's madman and his offspring, secularization theory, appear to
present an incomplete version of how some considerable portion of human beings actually come to think and behave
about things religious — not one by one and all on their own, but rather mediated through the elemental connections of husband, wife, child, aunt, great - grandfather, and the rest.
Yet the most remarkable
thing about the whole sorry saga, from the Jakes business until now, has been the silence of many of the men who
present themselves as the leaders of the movement and who were happy at one time to benefit from Mark Driscoll's reputation and influence.
For Sacks, the appalling
thing about Dr. P. was the inhuman formality of his gaze — his inability to find a «thou» behind the faces
presented to him.
And we too come feeling all of those
things: confused
about our past, bewildered
about our
present and scared
about our future.
«All these
things are real and
present dangers now, they're not future impossibilities and it's absolutely vital that there's an informed public debate
about how we inform and develop AI,» he said.
Skytag recently offered a couple of lengthy posts on the
things he finds must frustrating
about many (possibly most) believers, and the way they
present their positions.
The more the
present day is marked by noise — deafening noise —
about ephemera, the more Benedict's silence
about eternal
things becomes profound in contrast.
Every since mankind has been as the Apostle described us in his epistle (Again, 2 nd Timothy 3:1 - 5; see also what Jesus said in Mark 7:20 - 23), the only
thing that has «advanced «at our hands is our architecture, our technology, and our search for medicinal cures for what ails us.No one is denying that we've done tremendous good with these various advances, but we've also done awful, vicious, horrendous atrocities and brutalities as well.I've heard it quoted that out of all the centuries, millennia that we've considered ourselves «civilized», we've had only a few hundred years where something approximating peace has held sway among us.So again, I'm all world seeking to «make the world a better place», as it were; I just believe that mankind in his
present moral, ethical, and spiritual configuration is capable of doing so.We can always enhance out technological prowess, improve our architechural designs, and make our drugs more powerful, but what
about our hearts?
But for our
present purpose, it is enough to say that when we are thinking
about the last
things, our thought must include much more than human existence and human personality in its body - mind totality, even in its social relationships.
His principal message at
present is
about evangelisation, echoing the call of recent popes, and giving voice to a widespread concern
about a sense of life having lost its meaning for many people «There is this reduction of living to a general soft - core list of
things: money, health, individualism.
It's a terribly painful
thing when you open up
about abuse from the past, and it is used to abuse you again in the
present.
Furthermore, there was no school of thought in China that would have
presented a substantialist alternative to the view of being as change; the closest candidate would be the common - sense view of
things attacked by the Buddhists as illusion, and even here it was the Indian, not Chinese, sources of Buddhism that became most exercised
about criticizing the theory of permanent substances.
The word «eschaton» means «end times» or «last
things,» but it has never simply involved concern for a far - off future, because, as Jesus and his followers realized, what we believe
about the future dramatically affects how we live in the
present.
Perhaps Paul's hope is that
things will turn out as they do at the end of the book of Genesis, when Joseph
presents himself as a blessing for his jealous brothers in the famous words: «You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it
about that many people should be kept alive, as they are this day.»
Asking what might enable community to flourish, Archbishop Sentamu said: «We must learn from our
present political and economic challenges to think less
about the price of
things and more
about the value of
things.
The piece was misread, I think, because I had positive
things to say
about gay people and
about the love
present in countless gay relationships.
You can of course view all of this with skepticism, and not believe the evidence that others
present, but truly you can say the same
thing about even scientific theories if you have a high enough level of skepticism.
The wonderful
thing about this visionary pope, though, is that even as he looks towards the struggles we will all have to go through, he makes real and convincing his vision of the future: he works it into the
present reality in which we already live.
Those
things we care most
about seem not to be grounded in our
present convictions
about reality.