Sentences with phrase «about presenting things»

It's all about presenting things in a way that makes a person say, «I want that.»

Not exact matches

Second of all, if you lie about the job, then the person starts working for you and sees that things aren't the way you presented them, you are going to lose them and they will go work for another company.
I once had to present in front of a bunch of investors who had just heard from a Nobel Laureate who was trying to cure cancer, and I was up next talking about funny things on the internet.
Essentially it boils down to two things: Know what you're talking about, and present it with personal authenticity.»
Be realistic about financial estimates and projections: «When you present a plan to bankers and financiers, or even to your employees, people will get way more excited about what's real rather than some huge thing that's never going to happen,» says Ciccarelli.
«Cash, though, is to a business as oxygen is to an individual: never thought about when it is present, the only thing in mind when it is absent,» Buffett said.
(Steve Jobs and his team, who knew a thing or two about presenting, practiced this religiously.
While everyone is out there blogging about gift guides for someone else, let's focus on the really important things about Christmas: the presents for you!
Darren Rowse @problogger Founder and Keynote Speaker at ProBlogger Presenting: 10 Things I Wish I'd Known about Blogging That Will Shortcut the Growth of Your Blog
Hello, for all who might have missed this piece of information: We have created our own Bitcoin Faucet Guide, in which we present you with all of the most important things to know about the bitcoin faucets out there.
I'd say rather than try to invent wish fulfillment with myth and fairy tales about the way we'd like things to be, why not just find our contentment in our present existence, make ours the best lives we can live and just enjoy the ride we have, rather than invent one to dream about.
I am so sorry that you have been told / taught such awful things about Jesus, but whether or not you believe He is fully man and also fully God, there is more than enough proof historically and in present scripture to show that labeling Him as a mysogonist and an advocate for murder is a drastically false account of who He is and what He stood for.
The themes in it [are] the ever - present themes of adultery, as well as a pretty heavy drinking theme in the song (which probably comes from the fact that I drink pretty heavily), but the most interesting part of it to me, the thing I was most excited about when I wrote it was the bridge toward the end of the song where there's a car fire in the parking lot and all that stuff and the comment «what a cruel God we've got.»
In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information people need to know at this particular time.
Both the liturgical and theological traditions of the Church present to us certain things that must be said about God as revealed in Christ Jesus.
I agree with all the positive things Travis LaCouter said yesterday about Adam Greene's Bibliotheca Kickstarter campaign, an effort to present a reader's edition of the Bible, stripped of all verse numbers and other annotations and bound in four handsome volumes, one for the Law, one for the Prophets, one for the Writings, and one for the New Testament.
Actually, my favorite thing about church was playing / listening to music for the service and hanging out with friends and family.Fast forward to the present... I haven't gone to church in years.
Of course, our fictions and even our serious thinking about the terrestrial past or the astronomical present are full of things like fairies.
The fundamental question at stake, then, could not have been the scientific question of how things achieved their present form and by what processes, nor even the historical question about time periods and chronological order.
We also have the ecclesiastical radicals who say critical things about the present form of the institutional church.
Then it was on to Portland, where I couldn't help but think of the Portlandia song, «The Dream of the 1890s is Alive in Portland,» when my gracious host Andy Campell, (who homebrews his own beer, of course) presented me with AMAZING homemade bread from his wife April and began talking about his friends who make their own soap and, you know, pickle things.
At the present and with this hot media publicity exposure only The King of KSA has the Holy Power if to do any thing about for her getting a lower sentence or be released for deportation any where on Earth!!
And regardless of what you believe about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will present you with a new way of looking at things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.
It seems the drum beat is all about how bad the church is... how we need to listen to our accusers... could we not present the accusations and discuss them one by one... rather than alluding to them and things done so far in the past that to correct them is almost impossible.
the funny thing is the «left» always talks about SCIENCE and FACTS but whenever presented with any the response is often like... «have you talked to them all?»
This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,
So the principle that God uses language to tell us things is at once established; and the claim that Scripture is a further case in point - a claim, be it said, that is irremoveably embedded at foundation level in Jesus» teaching about his Messiahship and God's righteousness (1)-- presents no new conceptual problem.
Filled with realism about the present and a cautious hopefulness about the future, this volume points the way forward by looking back to - in that apt expression - first things.
It is to claim that for the purposes of addressing our three central issues about theological schooling it is the decisively important mode in which the Christian thing is present.
In it I want to do three things: firstly, to overview Roman Catholic positions on the spiritual soul, secondly to mention some of the reasons for the present virtual silence about the soul and, thirdly, to provide the beginning of a positive argument for the human soul.
Many classic carols came from creative Christian individuals; in 1848, Cecil Frances Alexander answered children's queries in poetry form — so when asked who made the world, she presented «All things bright and beautiful» and, when asked about Jesus» birth, she gave them «Once in royal David's city».
In sum, because it treats belief as an atomistic decision taken piecemeal by individuals rather than a holistic response to family life, Nietzsche's madman and his offspring, secularization theory, appear to present an incomplete version of how some considerable portion of human beings actually come to think and behave about things religious — not one by one and all on their own, but rather mediated through the elemental connections of husband, wife, child, aunt, great - grandfather, and the rest.
Yet the most remarkable thing about the whole sorry saga, from the Jakes business until now, has been the silence of many of the men who present themselves as the leaders of the movement and who were happy at one time to benefit from Mark Driscoll's reputation and influence.
For Sacks, the appalling thing about Dr. P. was the inhuman formality of his gaze — his inability to find a «thou» behind the faces presented to him.
And we too come feeling all of those things: confused about our past, bewildered about our present and scared about our future.
«All these things are real and present dangers now, they're not future impossibilities and it's absolutely vital that there's an informed public debate about how we inform and develop AI,» he said.
Skytag recently offered a couple of lengthy posts on the things he finds must frustrating about many (possibly most) believers, and the way they present their positions.
The more the present day is marked by noise — deafening noise — about ephemera, the more Benedict's silence about eternal things becomes profound in contrast.
Every since mankind has been as the Apostle described us in his epistle (Again, 2 nd Timothy 3:1 - 5; see also what Jesus said in Mark 7:20 - 23), the only thing that has «advanced «at our hands is our architecture, our technology, and our search for medicinal cures for what ails us.No one is denying that we've done tremendous good with these various advances, but we've also done awful, vicious, horrendous atrocities and brutalities as well.I've heard it quoted that out of all the centuries, millennia that we've considered ourselves «civilized», we've had only a few hundred years where something approximating peace has held sway among us.So again, I'm all world seeking to «make the world a better place», as it were; I just believe that mankind in his present moral, ethical, and spiritual configuration is capable of doing so.We can always enhance out technological prowess, improve our architechural designs, and make our drugs more powerful, but what about our hearts?
But for our present purpose, it is enough to say that when we are thinking about the last things, our thought must include much more than human existence and human personality in its body - mind totality, even in its social relationships.
His principal message at present is about evangelisation, echoing the call of recent popes, and giving voice to a widespread concern about a sense of life having lost its meaning for many people «There is this reduction of living to a general soft - core list of things: money, health, individualism.
It's a terribly painful thing when you open up about abuse from the past, and it is used to abuse you again in the present.
Furthermore, there was no school of thought in China that would have presented a substantialist alternative to the view of being as change; the closest candidate would be the common - sense view of things attacked by the Buddhists as illusion, and even here it was the Indian, not Chinese, sources of Buddhism that became most exercised about criticizing the theory of permanent substances.
The word «eschaton» means «end times» or «last things,» but it has never simply involved concern for a far - off future, because, as Jesus and his followers realized, what we believe about the future dramatically affects how we live in the present.
Perhaps Paul's hope is that things will turn out as they do at the end of the book of Genesis, when Joseph presents himself as a blessing for his jealous brothers in the famous words: «You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are this day.»
Asking what might enable community to flourish, Archbishop Sentamu said: «We must learn from our present political and economic challenges to think less about the price of things and more about the value of things.
The piece was misread, I think, because I had positive things to say about gay people and about the love present in countless gay relationships.
You can of course view all of this with skepticism, and not believe the evidence that others present, but truly you can say the same thing about even scientific theories if you have a high enough level of skepticism.
The wonderful thing about this visionary pope, though, is that even as he looks towards the struggles we will all have to go through, he makes real and convincing his vision of the future: he works it into the present reality in which we already live.
Those things we care most about seem not to be grounded in our present convictions about reality.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z