Sentences with phrase «about radiation health»

For example, the CDA exam requires knowledge about radiation health and safety, infection control and general chairside assisting, while the exam to become a CPFDA requires you to answer questions about topical anesthetics, sealants and teeth polishing.

In this episode, science writer Karen de Seve shares her adventures in the Bering Sea; journalist Dr. John Miller talks about a radiation health conference; and taxonomist and paleontologist Scott Thomson discusses the late Harriet the tortoise.

Not exact matches

Since then, we have launched products spanning maternity, nursery and fertility, enabling people to reduce their radiation exposure, while educating about the health issue in the US and our international markets.

As a result, several thousand of Fukushima's 2 million residents have been thrust into the middle of a vigorous scientific debate about the health effects of long - term exposure to low levels of radiation.

Rates of melanoma and other skin cancers have doubled there over the past ten years, prompting a wave of hard - hitting health campaigns about the dangers of UV radiation and heightening concern about the impact that ozone depletion might have in the future.

Researchers emphasize, however, that environmental levels of radiation outside the 20 - kilo metre evacuation zone around the power plant are currently far below levels that warrant concerns about human health.

«I believe the conclusions about exposure are generally solidly based; they are believable and reassuring, as well,» says Steven Simon, a radiation epidemiologist at the U.S. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland.

Cardiac stress testing, particularly with imaging, has been the focus of debate about rising health care costs, inappropriate use, and patient safety in the context of radiation exposure.

Nevertheless, experts are tracking radiation levels worldwide to learn more about the accident and to assess the possible impacts on health.

The amount of radiation is not necessarily provided in the report You can definitely ask you health provider about it if you have any concerns about this matter.

A typical nuclear medicine procedure may impart a radiation dose to the patient comparable to about one to four years of natural background radiation depending on the type of study.1 As with X-rays, the value of diagnostic imaging is great and the risks are negligible compared to the health benefits of having the procedure.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that the typical absorbed dose of mercury from amalgams is one to twenty - two micrograms per day, with most values in the range of one to five micrograms per day.16 Various factors, including gum chewing and bruxism, can increase these exposures to an upper range of about one hundred micrograms per day.7 Preliminary evidence also suggests that certain types of electromagnetic radiation, including EMR from mobile phones and from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may increase the release of mercury vapor from dental amalgams.17

She educates about the health effects of wireless radiation, the impending cancer tsunami and PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic fields) that restore human health on the cellular level.

Some microwave oven users may be concerned about potential health hazards from the exposure to microwave radiation leakage.

If you have any questions or concerns about the procedure, case management, radiation safety, health care issues or post radiation safety precautions, you should contact the Thyro - Cat main office.

The anti-nuclear movement to which I once belonged has misled the world about the impacts of radiation on human health.

As I understand things (and this is NOT my field at all) there is a robust dispute over how sure we can be about what ionizing radiation dose to human health at small doses.

«But as I commented at scienceprogress, the way I see the ledger, the religious Right gets a handful of anti-science points for views on evolution (and related rationalizations about the age of the earth, etc.), and for some dismissal of climate change theory, but the Left gets many more anti-science points for exaggerating the health and ecological risks of POPs; DDT; GMOs; plastics and plasticizers; pesticide residues; conventional agriculture; low - dose EM radiation; high - tension powerlines; climate change; population growth; resource depletion; chemical sweeteners; species extinction rates; biodiversity decline; and I'm sure the list could go on.

Monbiot wrote a column shortly after Fukushima where he went through the scientific research on radiation and concluded, «The anti-nuclear movement to which I once belonged has misled the world about the impacts of radiation on human health.»

Their reasons for objecting to the technology range from health concerns about the radiation and electromagnetic signals emitted from the devices, which they fear could cause cancer, migraines or other illnesses, to security and privacy fears.

By comparison, the average American is exposed to about 3 millisieverts of radiation a year from ground radon or flying in an airplane — a level not considered a risk to health.

Power transmission lines also reopen the debate about the uncertain health effects of electromagnetic field radiation and the perceived impact of EMF radiation on nearby property values, Boring says.