Steven Weinberg's observation
about religion as the only system that causes good people to do bad things can now be evidentially extended to AGW - assertionism.
He does try to make some place for teaching
about religion as against the exaggerated fears of administrators and teachers, but it is a small place.
Most mature Christian singles desire two things: someone who's within the same age range and is just as passionate
about religion as they are.
We can see that while there are debates about how best to serve the god of economism, there has thus far been no serious public or political debate
about this religion as a whole.
Though his film is an eloquent testimony to the power of a nun's religious faith, he himself is hesitant to speak
about religion as anything more than an offshoot of secular morality.
His colleague George Lindbeck added an insistence on the primacy of language over experience and a theory
about religion as a cultural - symbolic medium.
Karl Marx's word
about religion as an opiate is not easily dismissed.
He makes pointed use of sociological distinctions, noticing that in modern societies religion usually «is separated off in a distinct sphere» from politics; as a result, such societies do not fight wars
about religion as such.
Think
about religion as another drug addiction.
The are all
about religion as the trap the opposition in buildings putting their children in harms way.
Think
about religion as a drug addiction.
«Of course, we make lots of mistakes and we have lots of impulses, but people are as sensible
about their religion as they are about everything else — no more sensible perhaps, but surely no less.
There is a political factor, with twice as many Democrats saying politicians talk too much
about religion as Republicans.
ops sorry i meant Amniculi... blah blah blah about Poe's Law,, its hypocrisy!!!!!! talk trash about Christianity should be able to do the same about Islam, not encourging it just saying do nt be scare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do it will its not a felony yet, cause soon you wont be able too... Let me be clear, I meant express your opinions, comments
about any religion as you do about Christianity, plus Im not religious, i just believe in jesus christ son of god and the word of the bible which is difference religion is made by people...
Most people who vote really don't care
about religion as much as the media would like us to think.
If God is not much concerned
about religion as a separate sphere of private or public life and if he is present where the needy cry out for help, then as Christians we can not fail to take most seriously the analysis of the concrete social situation in which we find ourselves.
Dude, you are WAY out of your element, having read the bible, a couple of times I might add, I can assure you that I know probably about as much
about your religion as you do and quite a bit more about the many religions out there apart from christianity.
It's only the healthy living that are so obsessed
about religion as to object to this article.
They really don't — the concept of somebody saving their lives from a crucified execution occurring 2,000 years ago is appropriately distant and irrelevant to them, because the vast majority of believers put as much thought and effort into what they believe
about their religion as WHY they believe what they believe about their religion.
Professor Donaldson rightly identifies education
about religions as a crucial part of a child's development, and we believe this would be best delivered through a nationally - set syllabus which is fully - inclusive of both religious and non-religious worldviews.
Not exact matches
Islam is Malaysia's official
religion, though only
about 60 % of Malaysians are Muslim, and Malaysia touts itself
as a tolerant multicultural and multiethnic society.
The protests started in late May in Istanbul initially
as a reaction to the planned demolition of Gezi Park, but they rapidly grew into complaints
about a broader set of issues including freedom of
religion, press and expression.
@Yakobi try again,... how
about 1/3 fallen angels (now called demons) making up
religions /
as well
as belief of atheism to be worshiped directly / indirectly
as God?
At any rate, you people that are using this
as an opportunity to insult whatever
religion annoys / frightens you, and worse than that, engaging in a fight on this board, should really think
about getting the sticks you have stuck up your rear ends removed.
Anyone who knows anything
about acting knows this is a classic improv technique and not some comparison to God,
religion or even Obama's track record
as the President.
You freaks don't even see the other disease that islam poses that are being fought in the same time frame
as it is on your
religion, but you still whine
about it.
The Obama administration could have groveled and apologized
as much
as they wanted
about the unfortunate fact that Americans are allowed mock
religions.
As a Catholic woman told me
about her thinking when she went off to college, «To limit yourself to only people of your own
religion seemed bigoted....
How
about people grow up and stop believing in these ridiculous, bigoted
religions and treat this
as a human rights issue.
Presidential oratory provides much of the supporting evidence for McDougall's ideas
about civil
religion, from President William McKinley's implication that the United States had not so much conquered Cubans
as it had ministered to them («Are we not made better for the effort and sacrifice, and are not those we serve lifted up and blessed?»)
Perry can have his faith, but frankly, government is
about as opposed to
religion as it gets, and they just don't mix.
There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule
religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of
religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (
as far
as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
And the Church teaches that the freedom of
religion may not be infringed by government mandates that persons act contrary to what their consciences tell them
about the truth of such things
as the sanctity of life, the dignity of marriage, and the reality of sex
as the basis of «gender.»
Just
as this article said, and my comment above, to solve the divide, we can: (1) Argue
about the definition of Race / God (2) Argue
about identification in a
religion / race (3) Or realize the fundamental problem of prejudice that sneaks into human - made abstractions like «race» and «God».
Folks, this is what this grand sham known
as religion is all
about!
They got the slap on the wrists they deserved
as a wake up call to the real world, which is very very skiddish
about people practicing foreign
religions on an airplane in public.
I would never expect to learn
about science from a preacher, just
as I wouldn't expect to learn
about religion from a scientist.
This «aetheist» never did become a true aethesit,
as is proven by her continued exposure to the mental illness that is
religion and worrying
about CONVERTING her fellow mentally bereft sick religionists.
It is
about religion... and your right,
as soon
as religious people stop persecuting those that don't believe the world will be a better place.
Why does it seem so surprising to religious people that we Atheists would be just
as skeptical
about someone making a claim like this
as we are
about the
religion itself?
But to teach
about religion,
as Nord suggests, would not achieve neutrality without teaching
about secularism too.
hindu's hind hurts, shafted by truth
about their hinduism, absurdity labeled
as religion.
I love seeing christians talk
about people hating on
religion,
as if nothing bad has ever come from it.
Let me add I have not seen your 3 posts asking me
about how I feel
about it before now when I copied and posted those above and If I had seen before I would have answered you with out any hesitation but did not because I moved to other blogs... And to satisfy you interest my saying I do not like it
as a cultural habit but if
religion failed to stop it and had to regulate it then what can I do
about it... people can still lie and give you an elder age and how can you tell if 9 - 10or more at villages there are no birth certificate issued nor villagers interested to obtain it... what can you tell from their teeth like sheep??
We
as an Americans should educate ourselves and learn more
about other
religions before commenting and making racist remarks.
I listen to how they talk
about matters of faith,
religion, what they watch on their favorite religious tv programs, often listening
as well to their radios playing their favored «Christian music» radio stations in the background, what are in the lyrics.
you sir are practicing a
religion one that means so much to you that you use it
as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same
as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious
as far
as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism
as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap
as it is the base of your
religion.
If you (not * you *) are going to say something controversial in a public, then you should expect someone to call you on it and / or present another view, espcecially is a place such
as this blog,
about religion.
have a look at the vatican website and you will see how insecure the vatican are
about themselves now
as the picture of Mr Benedict has been altered to make him look like the other pope and this proves that they are desparate now to make Mr Benedict seem different to waht he really is and we are watching the end of a very dishonest and corrupt society /
religion
The people who like to spout off «
religion is just a fairy tale
about sky people,» are just
as bad
as those who stand outside colleges and try to convert people to their
religion.