In recent months, we've seen a new confidence in talking
about religion from the coalition.
ok castigated Shawn, writing, «Maybe you should get your information
about religion from people who understand it instead of your atheist circlejerk blogs.
It also bears mentioning, in closing, that the gains from thinking
about religion from a broader global perspective accrue not only to the academic researcher in pursuit of recondite problems to study but also to the practitioner of religion and to those whose interest in world affairs resides simply at the level of informed citizen.
What have we gained in insights
about religion from this study of a Whiteheadian philosophy of religion?
Do you listen to your self... do you know any thing
about the religion from the right sources?
ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more
about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious side of society is state it is hard to see religion being the serious side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?
But both parties saw sharp increases in the number of voters who want to hear less
about religion from politicians.
You won't learn anything positive
about religion from Christianity, and if you look for Christianity in religion, you'll never find it.
But good scienctific analytical intelligent folks would not draw their final conclusions
about a religion from those following.
I would never expect to learn about science from a preacher, just as I wouldn't expect to learn
about religion from a scientist.
However please notice my wording I like learning
about religion from my religious leaders and I raised my children and sent them to religious school to learn about religion.
In my case since I am not Christian it is even more important that my children learn
about their religion from somebody who actually knows and understands their religion.
Not exact matches
The Alberta government's showpiece bill this fall explicitly prohibits schools
from telling parents their children have joined a peer support club for LGBT students, and clarifies that existing notification policies
about discussions of sexuality and
religion don't go beyond class lessons.
This book by two psychology professors explores the hidden biases we all carry
from a lifetime of exposure to cultural attitudes
about age, gender, race, ethnicity,
religion, social class, sexuality, disability status and nationality.
Forget
about freedom of and
from religion?
They really don't — the concept of somebody saving their lives
from a crucified execution occurring 2,000 years ago is appropriately distant and irrelevant to them, because the vast majority of believers put as much thought and effort into what they believe
about their
religion as WHY they believe what they believe
about their
religion.
Your history is
about to see the bright light of day and the devious founders of your false
religion are
about to be exposed and it will come
from within your own organization.
I find it amazing that almost every organized
religion during that time was at least partially, if not fully involved in bigotry toward blacks, including outright banning them
from their membership and congretations altogether (which Mormans have never done), but only Mormons are still chided constantly
about their history with blacks, despite the fact that black members have had full benefits for almost four decades, and despite the fact that Mormons have been actively proselyting and doing charitable missionary work in Africa for over 160 years.
Obamas
religion however is straight up christian and it won't really do much good to follow him around with a moving billboard that lists death tolls
from christian persecution or other things
about the dogma that people already know and either don't care or already accept.
what you believe is not «biblically based», it's indoctrination
about ideas that came
from warping and exagerating ideas that existed in «pagan» (not actually the correct term but good for this purpose) mythologies, and the evil imaginations of men like Dante and those who desired to see those they considered inferior in doctrine, belief,
religion or culture in torture.
Re the christian and
religion bashing, when are we going to realize that anyone can do
about anything in the name of
religion,
from extreme evil to extreme charity.
Presidential oratory provides much of the supporting evidence for McDougall's ideas
about civil
religion,
from President William McKinley's implication that the United States had not so much conquered Cubans as it had ministered to them («Are we not made better for the effort and sacrifice, and are not those we serve lifted up and blessed?»)
There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule
religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of
religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover
from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
IMHO... I think «their obsession with
religion» is
about the sometimes crazy actions and outcomes that follow
from people of religious beliefs... especially the fundamentalists.
If you deside to come to this country
from another country not everybody knows
about your
religion and you need to let others know before you start your chanting etc..
GOD is not
religion and He did foretell
about about increase of knowledge at the end of days and people will be running to and
from more increasingly (airplanes / cars / mass transport) etc,..
And TO the people that says
religion is the cause of wars, plz stop it, how
about all the wars
from atheism?
I am not sure that a practicing believer of any faith, taking a break
from verbosity
about their
religion, will be any less religious... or gain much insight into the commonality of humanity and human experience.
I love seeing christians talk
about people hating on
religion, as if nothing bad has ever come
from it.
At least
religions have books
about their Gods and morality that have been claimed for thousands of years to have come
from their Gods.
Let me add I have not seen your 3 posts asking me
about how I feel
about it before now when I copied and posted those above and If I had seen before I would have answered you with out any hesitation but did not because I moved to other blogs... And to satisfy you interest my saying I do not like it as a cultural habit but if
religion failed to stop it and had to regulate it then what can I do
about it... people can still lie and give you an elder age and how can you tell if 9 - 10or more at villages there are no birth certificate issued nor villagers interested to obtain it... what can you tell
from their teeth like sheep??
Just this week, Newsweek served up an instant classic in the journalistic genre of «laugh to keep
from crying» miscues
about religion.
I think a fast
from verbosity
about religion may help the religious people to see how
religion - free people may indeed lack nothing, but instead, their «envelope» is just a particular sort of clothing — not necessary but fun for them perhaps.
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases
about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem
from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.
I am reminded of what Jesus said
about the purest form of
religion being taking care of the most vulnerable of society with widows and orphans and to keep
from being polluted by evil, in this case the love of money over meeting the needs of the poor.
There are two sides to that coin Lawrence... non-religious people are tired of people cramming their
religion down their throats as if it is okay for them to tought it around in other people's faces because their God says they are saved
from something... It used to be considered decent to not talk
about religion and politics, but people just have to put one or the other, or both in your face now - a-days.
Any discussion
about their
religion that straus
from perfection is immediately defined as persecution.
(A similar set of questions could be asked, mutatis mutandis,
about Jewish involvement with Islam, a
religion that also claims, although to a much lesser extent than Christianity, descent
from Judaism.)
If Christianity weren't crammed down my throat constantly in ways that no one in this country would tolerate
from any other
religion, I'd be more laid back
about it.
How
about all lbg people and especially athiests just stop eating anywhere that has a history or management that is
from a religious faith that means almost no grocery stores no restaurants 98 % of the world believes in a
religion the other 2 % can just not interact with the rest of us if thats what they want no skin off our backs make the world a better place just become reclusive your already hateful, distrustful and judgmental
Hey Jon, would you like to hear the awful thing said
about the dark man
from your so called
religion, please just ask me.
Dude, you are WAY out of your element, having read the bible, a couple of times I might add, I can assure you that I know probably
about as much
about your
religion as you do and quite a bit more
about the many
religions out there apart
from christianity.
Before you attack the Mormon
religion, please read
about it and not
from anti Mormon sites.
that is exactly the truth and read
about the islam actually
from their books if you can and you will find the terrible and disturbing facts
about this
religion.
Here's a website that has many quotes
from our founding fathers
about exactly what they thought
about religion.
One day many generations
from now, children will be studying history and learning
about religion.
My neighbors wife has been cheating on her husband for 3 yrs now and they keep it quiet and their divorce is hush hush living in the same house, my wifes mother is mormon (my wife bolted
from the «a womans job is to serve men and have babies»
religion at a young age) she has been divorced 3 times and doesn't have a clue
about just
about any subject.
The extrapolation
from «knows around 20 answers
about religion» to intelligence is ludicrous.
We are seeing several foundational truths
from Genesis 2
about how to understand life, theology, Scripture, society,
religion, and culture.
What I posted
about being in the early stages of transitioning
from a formal
religion to a personal faith WAS NOT
about you, but was
about those to whom you react abrasively.