Not exact matches
We will never include home addresses or any other information
about any person in our database that is not related to a business purpose,
for example, information regarding: race or ethnic origin; political opinions;
religious or other similar
beliefs; trade union membership; physical or mental health; sexual life; or criminal record.
It doesn't matter if you are:
religious, homosexual, skin colour, political alignment, etc. everyone is welcome to voice their ideas and nobody has been killed
for their
beliefs or background, though there have been some serious heated discussions
about Bitcoin and altcoins or the regulatory or non-regulatory stance.
Sure, all of us are ignorant
about some things, whether it's because it holds no interest
for us, or we haven't had the opportunity to learn
about it, or because reality conflicts with our
religious beliefs.
He said that the latest study (Professor Jordan Grafman, from the US National Inst - itute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in Bethesda,) suggests the brain is inherently sensitive to believing in almost anything if there are grounds
for doing so, but when there is a mystery
about something, the same neural machinery is co-opted in the formulation of
religious belief.
I actually agree that its pretty stupid to troll a blog dedicated to
religious belief, but you couldn't be more wrong
about upsetting atheists (or anyone
for that matter) over evolution.
*********************************** One would hope that voters were casting their ballots on the basis of what they conclude is best
for a civil society and a pluralistic population, not on the more egocentric opinions they may have
about right or wrong that are derived from their
religious beliefs.
Most notably, Kathryn Anderson of Pinedale said that «it would be obscene and offensive to discipline Judge Neely
for her statement...
about her
religious beliefs regarding marriage.»
Unlike Superman whose creation can actually be traced back to a couple of young Jewish men in 1938
for the purpose of providing a sellable fictional story line to Detective Comics, there is no such evidence in regards to
religious belief; especially since in this case being that this is
about a God who does not want to be made known but who would rather have us develop our faith.
Merkel, the daughter of a Lutheran minister is fairly private
about her
religious beliefs, although she has said that has said that Germany and her Christian Democratic Union party must stand
for the «Christian concept of humanity.»
Specifically, it's far less common to hear
about how a student who finds their way to or from Christianity, Islam, or Judaism (or even Atheism
for that matter) while attending a university.Taking classes and sharing experiences alongside classmates from varying backgrounds can cause even the most
religious or nonreligious person to inspect, analyze, and even question their
beliefs.
My friends at the invaluable Mirror of Justice blog have noted and commented on New York Times editor Bill Keller's snarky questions
for and
about the
religious beliefs of various Republican candidates, but I feel compelled to add my two cents» worth.
Would you then pray
for those whose
religious beliefs about Jesus are causing them persecution?
The issue
for me is not
about Romney's
religious beliefs, it more my
belief Romney will say and do anything to become President.
A wise man (who was
religious and clearly though I'd be be better off finding
belief in God) told me that all I HAD to know
about God
for the purpose at hand (sobriety) was that I wasn't him.
All you've done is make «stupid» comments because you didn't like the truth being told
about just how «stupid» it is going to sound
for an atheist to counsel someone regarding
religious belief, when the atheist is as
religious in his
beliefs as everyone else, with the exception that the atheist's
beliefs end in contradiction and self - refutation, which are hardly going to help anyone.
Religious leaders show passion
for their
beliefs and affirm their fears
about grand conspiracies that are a sign of the end times.
People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel
about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the
religious wars that have been fought
for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR
beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray
for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray
for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something
for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.
There is a lot of talk these days
about «respect
for religious beliefs», but does this really mean that nobody should criticize a religion in any way?
Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to
religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians,
for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi
belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares
about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions
about gods with no evidence of them existing.
Which leads Eberstadt to this: «There is plenty of reason
for pessimism
about what the future holds
for religious belief if by «pessimism» one means further decline.
Governments should recognize civil unions
for all and let
religious or philosophical
beliefs about choosing a mate remain outside of government.
The recognition of other
beliefs (other religions as well as other
beliefs in our religion), the desire to understand, the hope to explain to another, the wish to know the truth, and the attempt to unify all of one's
beliefs into a coherent whole are motivations
for reasoning
about religious beliefs.
Keller's column, «Asking Candidates Tougher Questions
About Faith,» argues that the crop of candidates competing
for the White House next year should be grilled on their
religious beliefs and on how those
beliefs inform their political views.
Questioning long held
religious beliefs can bring
about very compelling reasons
for making this change.
Keep religion out of politics and when a politician talks
about his or her
religious beliefs, don't vote
for them.
In spite of speaking openly
about his Christian faith and conversion experience, his
religious beliefs were often distorted
for political purposes.
But Stout's careful statement of the possibilities
for democracy raises other questions
about religious belief.
Why is it OK
for the
religious to crow
about their
beliefs, pamphletize, witness, and shout from the rooftops; yet atheists need to keep it to themselves?
For Wyschogrod, being Jewish is primarily
about God's election and only secondarily
about one's
religious belief or practice.
Romney, a former Mormon bishop, has been emphatic in response to questions posed
about particulars of his
religious beliefs: «I'm not running
for pastor in chief.
So there are three things to surmise
about Obama's affiliation with Wright: He obviously agreed with Wright's world view, else he wouldn't have attended that church
for so long OR he attended that church because it was politically convenient and matched the
religious / sociological
beliefs of those around him OR he was too dumb to realize what the preacher was screaming from the pulpit every Sunday was vile, pure hatred and distrust of the American gov «t...
Then PLEASE research this American - grown
religious cult and educate yourself
about their
beliefs before you vote
for Mitt Romney.
If it's so boring
for Christians to talk
about our
beliefs, why are you still reading
religious articles?
, could have simply made your point
about the misuse and abuse of
religious beliefs for political gain by focusing solely on the NPD Task Force and the political parties without disrespectfully addressing God.
Just as plenty of
religious folks can be quite rational when it comes to economics and decisions
about their work,
for instance, atheists can hold irrational
beliefs in other areas such as politics, and social values.
I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception
for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds
for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming
religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and
religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic
beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything
about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
Hate to say it, but
for all the rhetoric
about religious people being «intolerant», I usually see the most hate and intolerance coming from non
religious people who feel the need to post
about how «stupid» someone elses
beliefs are.
What is important, according to this line of thinking, is to let the adherents of each religion speak
for themselves
about the nature of their own
religious experiences, their views of the world and of life, and their own forms of
beliefs and worship.
Placher's answer to my question
about the relative truth or falsity of
religious claims touches upon my comment that current forms of epistemological relativism provide a justification
for affirming the truth of
beliefs without worrying
about whether they are true
for more than those who affirm them.
The
beliefs of the community that has nurtured them may be called
religious beliefs, but
for the most part they are not
beliefs about religion.
The Pope had expressed support
for the English Bishops in their concerns
about the planned law, and noted that «the effect of some of the legislation... has been to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of
religious communities to act in accordance with their
beliefs.
Single moms who were strict
about their
religious beliefs also had better - behaved children, perhaps because their parenting style provided extra structure
for their children...
I mean, their opposition to «gay marriage»
for example is founded on
religious beliefs they believe to be objectively true, to which any deviation is an offence against God - naturally, this will trump any commitment to pluralism or relativism, as your appeal
for a «secular state» seems to be
about.
In 2008, the campaign group the Accord Coalition was founded to ensure state funded schools teach
about the broad range of
beliefs in society; do not discriminate on
religious grounds and are made suitable
for all children, regardless of their or their parents»
religious or non-
religious beliefs.
The Bishop outlined his concerns
about persecution being faced by many
religious groups across the globe urged the British Government «to continue to support the United Nations rapporteur in moving beyond the issues of defamation or incitement, important as those issues are —
for 45 years the aspiration of drafting a convention on the freedom of religion or
belief has been on ice.»
Humanists UK Chief Executive Andrew Copson added, «Humanists UK is a founding member of the
Religious Education Council of England and Wales, and humanists have always advocated in the strongest terms for the importance of good quality, inclusive education in schools about religious and humanist
Religious Education Council of England and Wales, and humanists have always advocated in the strongest terms
for the importance of good quality, inclusive education in schools
about religious and humanist
religious and humanist
beliefs.
BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson, who was on the steering group
for the review, commented, «Government surveys have suggested that a majority or perhaps even two - thirds of young people today are not
religious, so
for religious education to remain relevant it is vital that this large group's
beliefs are taught
about alongside those of their
religious peers.
«
For me,
religious belief is more
about mystical feelings
about the world, and God is something one encounters in one's self,» says Isham, who converted to Christianity at the age of 40.
«It is likely that some people use their ideas
about science to make sense of the world and
for emotional compensation in difficult situations in the same way that
religious people use their supernatural
beliefs,» Farias says.
It was a controversial interpretation
for many, as it contradicted
religious beliefs about human origins; the short, stocky limb bones and the skull's oversized brow suggested an ape - like ancestor that did not fit in with the biblical idea of God's creation.