The state attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts, meanwhile, are investigating whether Exxon misled investors
about its risks from climate change.
In addition, the results are pragmatically important because they serve the public interest: There is ample evidence that the public is currently not being adequately informed
about the risks from climate change, owing largely to flawed media coverage, to which blogs make a contribution.
There is also evidence that media coverage surrounding climate change is often misleading and that some media organs disseminate falsehoods routinely, thereby denying the public the right to be accurately informed
about risks from climate change.
Not exact matches
«It is time to move on
from the fake debate over whether
climate change is real or poses a
risk, and onto the worthy debate
about what actions we must take to avoid a
climate catastrophe,» he said in an email.
I mean he's going to be hearing on the regular basis
from NASA and [the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration] and the Pentagon
about the acute
risks that face America because of
climate change.»
Many of his mistakes are big ones: he bungles the issues involving reserves and resources that are critical to his core argument
about oil remaining cheap; he drastically misleads his readers
about the extent to which sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions
from coal - burning have been reduced; he trivializes the
climate -
change risks from coals carbon dioxide emissions by suggesting we know the impacts will be worth only 0.64 cents per kilowatt - hour.
Paul Fisher, a Dot Earth reader
from New Jersey who recently expressed cogent concerns here
about dealing with the
risks in a complex engineered system — nuclear power plants — has offered similar observations
about a complex biogeophysical system in a comment on my post on Arctic
climate change, past and future.
A few points that have caught my interest so far: • dealing with complex problems using complex tools, ideas • the idea of reconciliation in scientific debates is to try different approaches in an experimental meeting for attempting nonviolent communication in impassioned debates where there is disagreement • reconciliation is not
about consensus, but rather creating an arena where we can have honest disagreement • violence in this debate derives
from the potential impacts of
climate change and the policy options, and differing political and cultural notions of
risk and responsibility.
«My years spent gathering and studying data
from in and around Antarctica leave me in no doubt
about the seriousness of the
risks that
climate change poses.
Another frequently mentioned option is for Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of New York to invoke the state's powerful stock - fraud statute, the Martin Act, as the state has done in recent years to force other fossil fuel companies to disclose more
about the financial
risks they face
from climate change.
The Intergovernmental Panel On
Climate Change, for instance, has sometimes made conclusions based upon the «balance of the evidence» The ideological climate skeptics, (to be distinguished from reasonable skepticism) often publicizes what is not known about these issues and ignores what is known and at the same time has accused those who have identified plausible but unproven risks as doing «bad science.
Climate Change, for instance, has sometimes made conclusions based upon the «balance of the evidence» The ideological
climate skeptics, (to be distinguished from reasonable skepticism) often publicizes what is not known about these issues and ignores what is known and at the same time has accused those who have identified plausible but unproven risks as doing «bad science.
climate skeptics, (to be distinguished
from reasonable skepticism) often publicizes what is not known
about these issues and ignores what is known and at the same time has accused those who have identified plausible but unproven
risks as doing «bad science.»
The workshop brought together policy makers, practitioners and researchers
from the fields of social protection,
climate change adaptation and disaster
risk reduction and had two core objectives: to understand better how social protection can be used to strengthen the poor's resilience to
climate and natural disaster
risk in developing countries; to create a forum for cross-regional learning
about good practice for realizing the potential synergies between social protection, disaster
risk reduction, and
climate change adaptation.
That's why these Arctic animals are some of the wildlife at greatest
risk from climate change: Living
about as far north as the planet allows, they have few options for adapting to rising temperatures and disappearing sea ice.
In response to growing calls
from investors and mounting concerns
about so - called carbon bubble
risk, the TCFD earlier this year recommended that listed firms publicly report on how
climate change and the low carbon transition could affect their business.
Advocates of
climate - related reporting maintain that investors are not being adequately informed
about the considerable
risks businesses face
from climate change.
As the interpretation of infinity in economic
climate models is essentially a debate
about how to deal with the threat of extinction, Mr Weitzman's argument depends heavily on a judgement
about the value of life... A lack of reliable data exacerbates the profound methodological and philosophical difficulties faced by
climate change economists... The United Nations conference in Paris this December offers a chance to take appropriate steps to protect future generations
from this
risk... http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2015/07/
climate-
change (MOST COMMENTING ARE NOT AT ALL IMPRESSED)
1971 Experts
from 14 nations gather in Stockholm to discuss
climate change and issue report with warnings
about the
risk of severe
climate change
But now, researchers and practitioners are starting to ask how they can help address L&D, and many are confused, particularly
about how L&D mechanisms might be distinct
from existing approaches to adapt to
climate change, and manage disaster
risk.
I was thrilled to get an email this past summer
from Amitav, in which he said that he had enjoyed my book Storm Surge and wanted to talk to me
about climate change and the
risk to Mumbai.
Because it has been scientifically well established that there is a great
risk of catastrophic harm
from human - induced
change (even though it is acknowledged that there are remaining uncertainties
about timing and magnitude of
climate change impacts), no high - emitting nation, sub-national government, organization, business, or individual of greenhouse gases may use some remaining scientific uncertainty
about climate change impacts as an excuse for not reducing its emissions to its fair share of safe global greenhouse gas emission on the basis of scientific uncertainty.
The Philippines, ranked second-most at
risk from climate change in a recent United Nations report, reports the greatest concern
about the personal toll of
climate change among the Asian nations surveyed.
It is that movement which prefigures all cost - benefit analyses and debates
about risk and the management of
risk, be it
risk from terrorism,
climate change or drunken behaviour.
In addition to concealing the known
risks, Exxon and Suncor... directed, participated in, and benefited
from efforts to misleadingly cast doubt
about the causes and consequences of
climate change, including: (1) making affirmative and misleading statements suggesting that continued and unabated fossil fuel use was safe (in spite of internal knowledge to the contrary); and (2) attacking
climate science and scientists that tried to report truthfully
about the dangers of
climate change.
Both MRC and CFACT have previously accepted grants
from oil company ExxonMobil, which is currently under investigation by the New York attorney general for allegedly lying
about the
risks of
climate change to the public and investors.
We don't know much
about tipping points, but, as Howarth observes, «'' the world runs a high
risk of catastrophic
climate change in the period of 15 to 35 years
from now.
Peabody Energy, the world's biggest private sector coal company, has agreed to make more robust disclosures to its investors
about the financial
risks it faces
from future government policies and regulations related to
climate change and other environmental issues that could reduce demand for its product.
Reading the Sierra Club report, I'm inclined to think the
risk is less that policy makers will follow its recommendations and more that it will be viewed as evidence that those who care
about climate change in rich countries are trying to stop poor countries
from developing modern, high - energy lives.
ExxonMobil now faces the prospect of civil lawsuits and possible criminal penalties, for allegedly suppressing its internal awareness
about the serious
risk to the environment as well as to shareholder value,
from climate change caused by the burning of fossil fuels.
California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris is investigating whether Exxon Mobil Corp. repeatedly lied to the public and its shareholders
about the
risk to its business
from climate change — and whether such actions could amount to securities fraud and violations of environmental laws.