Not exact matches
Meat Free Monday is
about eating less meat in order to
slow climate change, help the environment and live a healthier life!
But it wasn't until she wrote this poignant post, «Mothers Needed to Protect the Earth,» that I really started thinking harder
about harnessing the power of the Green Mom blogosphere to draw attention to
climate change and to advocate
changes to
slow the rate of global warming.
The governor has been
slow to embrace some environmental causes — he was notably careful in his rhetoric
about climate change and he delayed a decision on fracking in the state for years.
«We should not be complacent
about continued subsidies from nature in
slowing climate change.»
But two groups with the power to do something
about slowing down
climate change — the politicians and the industrialists — do not yet recognise the urgency of the situation.
A new study by scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, and the University of California, Irvine, shows that while ice sheets and glaciers continue to melt,
changes in weather and
climate over the past decade have caused Earth's continents to soak up and store an extra 3.2 trillion tons of water in soils, lakes and underground aquifers, temporarily
slowing the rate of sea level rise by
about 20 percent.
One thing that struck me, however, was that although the evidence of
climate change is overwhelming in «Chasing Ice,» there's very little
about slowing or stopping the planet from warming.
Model studies for
climate change between the Holocene and the Pliocene, when Earth was
about 3 °C warmer, find that
slow feedbacks due to
changes of ice sheets and vegetation cover amplified the fast feedback
climate response by 30 — 50 % [216].
I wrote
about that consensus last year in covering the reports released by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, but also wrote
about scientists» frustrations over trying to convey the importance of a
slow - motion disaster.
The data show that the sun's variations have been small over the times we care
about, the
climate responds to variations in sunshine caused by orbital
changes, but these are
slow.
Those concerned
about global warming (including at least one study author) are stressing that a longer evolutionary timeline implies the bears» adaptation to
climate change in the past was a
slow process (meaning the speed of
change now poses new threats).
When introducing his first entry on this blog a few weeks ago, Mr Revkin spoke
about «
slow drips», how
changes in the
climate take place so slowly over time that they are like
slow drips (I think that is what he meant).
Nature is kicking back on us because we're just
slow learners
about hurricane infrastructure preparations as well as not paying enough attention to the real world consequences of human - induced global warming and
climate change.
If it tells you anything more generally
about GCMs, it tells you that in order to get the present day
climate right, they have made compromises that tend to make them
slower to
change than nature is.
They say their findings, which focused on the effect titling had on forest clearing and disturbance in the Peruvian Amazon between 2002 and 2005, suggest that the increasing trend towards decentralized forest governance via granting indigenous groups and other local communities formal legal title to their lands could play a key role in global efforts to
slow both tropical forest destruction, which the researchers note is responsible for
about the same amount of greenhouse gas emissions as the transportation sector, and
climate change.»
Learn more
about black carbon by watching Stop Soot: The Easiest Way to
Slow Climate Change, an animated video.
In addition to raising doubts
about climate science and
about the need to
slow climate change by reducing emissions, the company site omits any discussion of the costly consequences of
climate change, choosing instead to focus exclusively on high - end estimates of the costs of reducing emissions.
You can not talk credibly
about lowering emissions globally if, for example, you are
slow to acknowledge
climate change; if you undermine calls for an effective carbon price; and if you always descend into the «jobs versus environment» argument in the public debate.
Robert I Ellison: Dynamical complexity explains both persistence and abrupt shifts in
climate data — and demands that we
change our expectations
about future behaviour from
slow and gradual to abrupt and potentially large.
After talking with dozens of climatologists and related researchers, David Wallace - Wells writes
about what will happen to the Earth and human civilization without taking «aggressive action» on
slowing climate change.
Dynamical complexity explains both persistence and abrupt shifts in
climate data — and demands that we
change our expectations
about future behaviour from
slow and gradual to abrupt and potentially large.
Learn more
about seven species that may be the most affecting ambassadors for fast, strong action to
slow down
climate change.
Most often if you have uncertainty
about the effects of what you are doing, you
slow down until you know more
about it, yet neither advocate
slowing down except as a by - product of looking for energy efficiency and reduced emissions that they suggest would happen anyway without the motivation of their unknown
climate change effects.
The report is framed around communicating
about climate change effectively — but read more closely and you'll quickly see that the reason we need help here to begin with is that humans have some pesky attributes, ones that render us pretty poor at grappling with
slow - moving, long - range, collective problems like
climate change.
«If we don't do something»
about slowing the impact of
climate change, he said, «we give up any ability to stave off ocean acidification and sea level rise.»
Point above being that one could write a long list of reasonable initiatives without mentioning anything
about greenhouse gases or
climate change, which could arguably be good in general, but possibly also
slow the
change, should it happen in the first place of course.
It's an appropriate name for a group that's attempting to
slow some of the runaway misinformation
about climate change, by doing what scientists do with their published work: review it.
Model studies for
climate change between the Holocene and the Pliocene, when Earth was
about 3 °C warmer, find that
slow feedbacks due to
changes of ice sheets and vegetation cover amplified the fast feedback
climate response by 30 — 50 % [216].
All of this is bad news for anyone who cares
about reducing pollution, whether to
slow climate change or simply clean the air.
With a general
slow - down in global economic activity, plus the rise of more rightwing, inward - looking political parties in many developed countries, there are doubts
about how quickly funds will be mobilised for the developing world to fight
climate change.
When I wrote
about Dr. Lomborg's proposal to focus less on
climate change and more on problems like malnutrition and disease, he told me: «I don't think our descendants will thank us for leaving them poorer and less healthy just so we could do a little bit to
slow global warming.
In an email to the Guardian he says: «
Climate change is no longer something we can aim to do something
about in a few decades» time, and that we must not only urgently reduce CO2 emissions but must urgently examine other ways of
slowing global warming, such as the various geoengineering ideas that have been put forward.»
Read more
about overfishing: Overfishing Means Marine Animals Are Starving: Report How Overfishing Almost Got Capt. Phillips Killed by Pirates Overfishing is
Slowing, But Only in Areas With Good Fisheries Management Global Fisheries Hit by
Climate Change and Overfishing
In one of its occasional assessments, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change — the cowinner with Al Gore of the Nobel Peace Prize — posited a scenario in which the global economy would grow at about 2 percent a year for the next 100 years (it's growing at more than twice that pace currently) with «fragmented» and «slow» per capita economic growth and technological c
Change — the cowinner with Al Gore of the Nobel Peace Prize — posited a scenario in which the global economy would grow at
about 2 percent a year for the next 100 years (it's growing at more than twice that pace currently) with «fragmented» and «
slow» per capita economic growth and technological
changechange.