Throughout the world, right - wingers everywhere are getting very serious
about slowing global warming.
Not exact matches
But it wasn't until she wrote this poignant post, «Mothers Needed to Protect the Earth,» that I really started thinking harder
about harnessing the power of the Green Mom blogosphere to draw attention to climate change and to advocate changes to
slow the rate of
global warming.
The deceleration in rising temperatures during this 15 - year period is sometimes referred to as a «pause» or «hiatus» in
global warming, and has raised questions
about why the rate of surface
warming on Earth has been markedly
slower than in previous decades.
Since methane can cause
about 20 times as much atmospheric
warming as carbon dioxide, curbing methane would help
slow global warming.
But, noted Nancy Knowlton of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C., «If we do want to have reefs around by 2050, we are going to have to do something
about carbon dioxide» to
slow global warming and acidification.
Scientists have discovered that rising ocean temperatures
slow the development of baby fish around the equator, raising concerns
about the impact of
global warming on fish and fisheries in the tropics.
Feed - in tariffs on fossil energy imports to the United States would surely end up reducing demand for fossil fuels as more and more renewable capacity became available — which is exactly what you would want to see happen if you are serious
about slowing the rate of
global warming.
Those concerned
about global warming (including at least one study author) are stressing that a longer evolutionary timeline implies the bears» adaptation to climate change in the past was a
slow process (meaning the speed of change now poses new threats).
It also strikes me as complacent, or even reckless, to assume that any
slowing is proof that
global warming is nothing to worry
about.
While
global temperatures rose by
about one - fifth of a degree Fahrenheit per decade from the 1950s through 1990s,
warming slowed to just half that rate after the record hot year of 1998.
It does show that positive feedbacks are dominant, and for timescales of anthropogenic
global warming about 2 to 4.5 degrees Celsius per doubling, and a bit higher if you include century - timescale «
slower feedbacks» such as ice sheets.
Nature is kicking back on us because we're just
slow learners
about hurricane infrastructure preparations as well as not paying enough attention to the real world consequences of human - induced
global warming and climate change.
So there is nothing remarkable either
about the rate of
global warming (except that it is
slowing when the climate extremists had predicted it should be accelerating) or
about the absolute
global temperature (except that it is remarkable only for being unremarkable).
About the mystery that vexes ABC — Why have Americans been
slow to get in lock step concerning
global warming?
The speakers faulted partisan politics in Washington for
slowing efforts to fight
global warming and for allowing the fossil fuel industry almost free rein to deceive the public
about the harm of
global warming.
Again, there is a real debate
about the pace and rhythm of
global warming, and
about the degree to which it has been caused (or can be
slowed) by human activity.
We watch Peter Evans as he meets the legal and scientific team assembled by NERF to prosecute the sea level rise lawsuit, and here the story really
slows down as the NERF team tries to educate Evans
about the uncertainties of the
Global Warming theory.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans
warming slower (or cooling
slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to
warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water
warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse
global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands»
warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters
warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a
global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the
global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small
warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very
warmer than air during day, and how much it can
slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point
about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small
global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
«If California's efforts in reducing black carbon can be replicated globally, we can
slow down
global warming in the coming decades by
about 15 percent, in addition to protecting people's lives,» Ramanathan said.
So think
about the logic of that for a minute: «because 1998 was an extremel; y hot year,
global warming has
slowed / stopped.»
Decades of academic and western liberal sycophants whining
about greenhouse
warming has not
slowed down
global CO2 emission one tiny bit.
If you're talking
about a change in the rate, trend of
warming, or even just say that «
warming has
slowed» in the context of the general discussion
about global temperature records, you are implying something
about a change in trend.
IPCC: It is very likely that the
global warming of 4 °C to 7 °C since the Last Glacial Maximum occurred at an average rate
about 10 times
slower than the
warming of the 20th century.
When I wrote
about Dr. Lomborg's proposal to focus less on climate change and more on problems like malnutrition and disease, he told me: «I don't think our descendants will thank us for leaving them poorer and less healthy just so we could do a little bit to
slow global warming.
And if the «extra heat» is being stored in the oceans, why is it that if you do a little research into thermohalene ocean circulation they talk
about it
slowing down because of
global warming, not speeding up?
The slowdown in
warming was, she added, real, and all the evidence suggested that since 1998, the rate of
global warming has been much
slower than predicted by computer models —
about 1C per century.
I told Rose that I was puzzled my Muller's statements, particularly
about «end of skepticism» and also «We see no evidence of
global warming slowing down.»
You may even have read
about this, and
about how some scientists believe that the contribution of aerosols as a result of explosion may have contributed to the relative
slow - down of
global warming of the last few years.
Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the
global mean trends than dTs below; it slightly underestimates
warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a
slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover
about two thirds of the Earth's surface.
In an email to the Guardian he says: «Climate change is no longer something we can aim to do something
about in a few decades» time, and that we must not only urgently reduce CO2 emissions but must urgently examine other ways of
slowing global warming, such as the various geoengineering ideas that have been put forward.»
Since I wrote one of the first books for a general audience
about global warming way back in 1989, and since I've spent the intervening decades working ineffectively to
slow that
warming, I can say with some confidence that we're losing the fight, badly and quickly — losing it because, most of all, we remain in denial
about the peril that human civilization is in.
«
Global Warming Could Forestall Ice Age, Study Suggests,» an article in the September 4 New York Times by Andrew Revkin, talks about a new study that concludes that human - driven global warming could reverse a slow, long - term Arctic cooling trend and... Continue rea
Global Warming Could Forestall Ice Age, Study Suggests,» an article in the September 4 New York Times by Andrew Revkin, talks about a new study that concludes that human - driven global warming could reverse a slow, long - term Arctic cooling trend and... Continue re
Warming Could Forestall Ice Age, Study Suggests,» an article in the September 4 New York Times by Andrew Revkin, talks
about a new study that concludes that human - driven
global warming could reverse a slow, long - term Arctic cooling trend and... Continue rea
global warming could reverse a slow, long - term Arctic cooling trend and... Continue re
warming could reverse a
slow, long - term Arctic cooling trend and... Continue reading →
It is evident that there is a deadlock
about how to
slow down the
global warming in terms of Green House Gas emissions and international actions, as the Kyoto Protocol expires next year.
The «note» you refer to goes: «Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the
global mean trends than dTs below; it slightly underestimates
warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a
slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover
about two thirds of the earth's surface.»
For example,
global action on black carbon and methane can help
slow down expected
warming in 2050 by up to 0.5 degree Celsius and avoid
about 2.4 million annual premature deaths and 52 million tonnes of annual crop loss by 2030.