Sentences with phrase «about solving their legal problem»

I guess maybe what I'm thinking is that by opening up the window, by learning how to code, learning what's possible, it lets you see a different way of serving clients and solving legal problems, and part of me thinks that, as new possibilities come online, new ways of serving clients by building tools that fix things, like this parking ticket app, like a service that allows lawyers to build a referral network that makes them look more like a giant, spread out firm, and other things, as these possibilities come out there, you can stop thinking about serving just one client's legal needs, and start thinking about solving that legal problem for anyone who comes to you.

Luckily, the written word happens to be what prospective clients want to see when they go hunting for information about solving their legal problem.

Not exact matches

«Legislating is about problem solving, and I believe it is a significant problem that New York State has no mandatory reporting law for parents, legal guardians, caretakers or other responsible adults to not notify law enforcement of the death of their child, accidental or otherwise, within atimely manner of the death being discovered.»

I enjoy meeting people, learning about their lives and careers and most importantly, helping them solve whatever their legal problem is.»

This is true whether you're talking about solving a research or discovery problem, sketching out a legal strategy, assessing the merits of a case, or performing a multitude of tasks that a lawyer now confronts.

If you share our perspective that the business of law can be better... if you recognize that yesterday's thinking won't solve tomorrow's problems... if you're passionate about finding better approaches to the most serious challenges facing the legal community... then get in touch at [email protected] and get to know Apogee as we transform the business of law through practical application of artificial intelligence.

Ask him about two things: building a successful litigation practice from scratch and solving legal problems with technology.

One of my favourite things about being a lawyer is that legal work provides unending opportunities for problem solving.

I mean it's this interesting dynamic that we've talked about on the show before where there's for sure the distinction between access to justice and access to lawyers, and that you can have your legal problem or your life problem with legal implications solved without necessarily needing to engage a lawyer, so not all access to justice problems are access to lawyer problems.

Be grateful that you can still impress some people at parties, you can afford to pay the mortgage in your house in the suburbs and that on occasion, you can sit back and say to yourself that you helped solve someone's legal problem and felt good about it.

So how should we start thinking about that when we think about the construction of the legal system and how to solve that problem?

Today were replaying a conversation with Brad Clark about building websites that let him solve potential clients problems before they meet him and about his creative access to justice efforts from Mobile legal clinics to financial aid for criminal expungement.

Usually we're talking about young women who want to know these stories, they want to know the background those are the perfect candidates for the intake position because we don't want them trying to solve this person's problem and most of us even after a few months in the legal industry, we think we have enough information to jump to solving.

The bottom line is to figure out what the clients you'd like to have are doing to solve their problems, and show up to let them know about the legal issue you can help with.

We talked about an access to justice gap, but what people are usually talking about is an access to lawyers gap because there is actually no gap in the number of people who have their legal problems solved.

I learned about the importance of medical - legal partnerships, where lawyers can be part of the team at VA medical facilities and I have learned that when lawyers are on the team they can often help solve the underlying problem that brings the veteran to the facility, such as homelessness and without the exposure on the street the veteran has a place to live, often they don't need to come to the medical facility as often.

Sometimes we worry about the complexity of the environmental and social problems we're all facing but are reminded that Indigenous legal orders offer important tools for solving complex problems.

legal problems they don't know that they have, e.g., one unserviced legal problem often leads to several more — e.g., termination of employment without cause or compensation, means debt, loss of property, family break - up, depression, substance abuse, and sometimes suicide, etc.; and, (3) enlist the help of the social media, news media, pressure groups, and those political parties in opposition to governments; (4) everyone should complain loudly to all of the above about law societies» failure to try to solve the unaffordable legal services problem — their failure to attack it is the cause.

We discussed the new Relativity Ecosystem, interoperability trends focusing on tools that solve business problems, and the buzz about creating apps for legal technology software at kCura's annual user conference, Relativity Fest.

Sebastian Ko, Regional Director and Senior Legal Counsel of integrated legal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring about transformational change and solve long unresolved problems in the law, such as access to jusLegal Counsel of integrated legal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring about transformational change and solve long unresolved problems in the law, such as access to juslegal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring about transformational change and solve long unresolved problems in the law, such as access to justice.

That goes to something we've talked about before on the podcast which is realize that lawyers tend to be myopic thinking about, «There is a legal problem and I have the solution to it,» rather than, «My client has a problem, one aspect of which is a legal problem that I was trained to solve in law school, but there's a bigger problem that I can help solve.»

Inspired by Lon Fuller, who, in Rod Macdonald's words, «saw law as a human project, a human accomplishment, and a human aspiration that emerges from ongoing patterns of human interaction and the reciprocal adjustment of human expectation,» he conceived legal education as being, at its core, learning how «to attend to the complexities of human beings in interaction with each other,» stating that we should teach how law could be «a facilitator of human interaction» and «about finding social outcomes that help solve human problems [rather than] perfecting abstract concepts to solve legal puzzles.»

I think they apply whether we're talking about individuals who definitely are under - served by lawyers today, but I think it goes all the way up to the largest clients, too, where there are large corporates that have all these legal needs that aren't being met because it's just not either packaged or priced in a way that works for them to get these problems solved.

For all of that, what I most value about my legal training is that it taught me how to solve problems and help others solve theirs.

Through this notion of law as a means of solving human problems, Rod Macdonald taught us his most important lesson — what legal education should really be about.

Legal AI has been so successful already because the bigger story is always one about positive change, the one about using technology to solve problems, deliver value, open up new areas of insight and capability, as well as to boost productivity, not just in the law, but across the entire economy.

However, the building of this kind of process requires a knowledge about substantive legal problems and how people practically can solve them which would go beyond what a court in this country would normally hold themselves out as holding.

Despite these limitations, AttorneyFee.com is making a major contribution towards providing a visible data base about how much it costs to solve legal problems.

In other places where there are already robust law and technology communities by the time a Legal Hackers chapter forms (as was the case in DC), it's really about creating a forum for those existing communities to convene and solve problems together.

I don't think we should stop talking about AI, but I do think we should focus on tackling problems that are still plaguing the legal industry that a robot drafting a legal pleading from scratch can't solve.

The objective of this model is to provide a design language for thinking about, and solving, legal engineering problems.

This question is being asked more broadly in Law Schools as legal academics and lawyers bring design principles to the question of where and how people access legal education, where and how people learn about law, and where and how people solve the problems that matter most in their lives.

Therefore we see for example, LSUC embracing apps, with no assessment as to: (1) their relation to, and impact upon solving the problem; (2) their ability to bring about the economies - of - scale so badly needed in the production of legal services; (3) their ability to serve and sustain the continued existence of the general practitioner; (4) the prevalence (frequency and availability) of the solicitor - client relationship among all of the many and fast - moving developments in the provision of legal services; and, (5) the issues set out above.

In the legal department it's about trying to anticipate where you will have challenges throughout the course of a transaction; to solve the problems quickly and effectively.

Heck, now that I've essentially solved the legal industry's biggest problem, maybe it's time to move on to global warming or bringing about world peace.

The latest legal needs survey in the Netherlands (Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2014) suggests that 48 per cent of people seeking assistance in the legal sector want advice about how to solve problems; 45 per cent advice about their rights and obligations; 24 per cent help with approaching the other party; 20 per cent mediation; 18 per cent some kind of financial advice; and 16 per cent help with starting a procedure.

The new delivery paradigm is also about automation, predictive tools, data, and analytics designed to enable consumers to detect legal problems before they metastasize and to solve business challenges that raise legal issues more quickly and efficiently.

And right now, legal hackers seem to be getting their projects mainly from municipalities and a few «thought leaders» within the academe — people who generally don't have the kind of deep knowledge about legal problems facing solo and small - firm lawyers and their clients that would be necessary to come up with a list of problems to solve.

Despite the differences, what seems universal are concerns about the national laws and legal procedures families must rely on when they can not solve their own problems, whether these are problems associated with divorce or child protection matters.