Sentences with phrase «about teaching science»

Send us your techie poems, your poems about specific ecosystems, your poems about teaching science or math.

Was the Heritage Foundation concerned about teaching science to our schoolchildren?

He is passionate about teaching Science and also holds the pastoral care position of Head of House in the Senior School.

Its about teaching science in science class as opposed to trying to slip in some pseudo-science.

Not exact matches

What's more, she's also using the day to teach her students about the lack of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.

Studies show that school gardens have multiple benefits, from teaching students about plant science and agriculture, to instilling a sense of responsibility.

Stutzky says zombies can also teach kids important lessons about the social sciences — psychology, social work, group dynamics.

I grew up on a farm in Cornwell, Conn. and after majoring in environmental science in college, I spent several years leading high school students on expeditions into the woods to teach them about the environment.

He can teach you more about the art and science of marketing than anyone I know.»

Running that first shop taught me that business is not financial science; it's about trading: buying and selling.»

He taught political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio and DePauw University and wrote A Plain Blog About Politics.

«Me» - The problem isn't with teaching about Creationism, but with teaching it AS SCIENCE, which it is not.

I've seen plenty of followers of Jesus Christ who support, finance, learn about and teach science.

What has science taught us about or bodies?

Lawrence, You started by asking a foolish question about why not teach religious origins theories in science class?

southerneyes44, you wrote «Germany doesn't teach about him» in regards to Hitler That's a ludicrous assertion as is «Theories in science change with the newspaper.»

Thanks for teaching our kids all about science in the most groovey, creative and fun way!

You had better learn to accept Jesus first or no dice, and even then our «science» will focus on teaching you about the miracles of Jesus.

Science has taught us extraordinary truths about this universe — from what composes matter (atomic physics), to the great variety and forms of life (evolution) to medicine (germ theory of disease).

Once we accept that the language of Genesis is symbolic, then there is no difficulty in holding both what it really teaches about creation and what we have learned from modern science.

«The creation story is taught in science and there is no evidence that pupils learn scientific theories about the origin of the Earth.»

We set about teaching our eldest how her faith is compatible with science and hoped that would be the last time she would encounter such a misrepresentation.

Science teachers should teach whatever is the current knowledge about sScience teachers should teach whatever is the current knowledge about sciencescience.

Especially ones that encourage, support, finance, participate in, teach and share knowledge about science.

When you reject a religious group because they are closed off about science, or teach you to hate people because they're different, or tell you that genocide is good and holy, or cover up child molestation to protect a pastor, God cheers you on.

This we may readily concede, and many neurologists, psychologists, biochemists etc., would willingly agree; but no understanding of man can be any longer satisfactory, which is content to ignore what these sciences have taught us about the nature of man as a psychosomatic organism.

You don't have to go very far down that road before you start thinking about creation science or scientific creationism, or get involved in school board squabbles about whether Genesis should be taught alongside of evolution in high school biology courses.

The more you know about science today and the religions of the ancient world, the less it is possible to believe what you were taught as a child, even if you wanted to.

He's griping about science being taught that's supposedly out of date and he is way out of date on evolution theory.

Actually, come to think of it everything I believe about science has been taught to me by people that probably never quantified or personally experimentally verified the information they were teaching.

Science can teach us about paint, pulverized minerals, color, light, optics, and proportional harmony, but it can not explain the mystery of beauty on the finished canvas — how moral, societal, and transcendent truths can be revealed through the drama and execution of a piece of music or architecture.

This young woman is very confused and seems not to understand what science has taught us about the origins and evolution of life.

Does revelation have anything to teach us about the worth of our natural environment that we can not already find in the resources of science?

When it starts getting into science however and they choose not to teach facts about science, I'd be hardpressed to believe that a student who was seriously looking to go into medicine would choose a place that doesn't teach it correctly, and even more, I don't think many hospital would want students from a college that didn't teach medicine.

Like Maclntyre, Taylor is unusually knowledgeable about the social sciences (he has taught in...

But there was nothing great about our lives — nothing that took us outside of our secular humanist worldview that told us that science and logical reasoning would teach us the meaning of life.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

After trying to teach evolution and learning the truth about that and other false science (see piltdown man, etc) I have looked more at all offerings and just believe what I have found to be the truth.

Best of all, this book closed with several chapters on pertinent theological questions for today, such as how to reconcile the Bible and science, how to understand the violence of God in the Old Testament, and how to make sense of what the Bible teaches about women, homosexuality, and the fate of those who have never heard the gospel.

Tout all you want about all the «science» you studied; they were either taught by quacks or you got D's.

In fact, the primary virtue of panexperientialism is that, in spite of its initial implausibility (at least to those taught to see through dualist or materialist lenses), it enables us to coordinate our hard - core commonsense presuppositions with what we have learned about the world from the special sciences.

He was excited when he arrived on campus because, after years of working in other environments, he thought that he was finally about to learn, from his colleagues on the faculty, how one could teach science in a way that was integrated fully with the faith.

If we use Gould to interpret Catholic teaching we are bound to be dualistic not just about science and religion but also about body and spirit, as if God somewhat arbitrarily glues a spiritual soul onto the physical human body.

All of sudden, science was challenging some of the philosophical / theological teaching of the church, and once again, the church was faced with the question of what to do about it.

This may have something to do with the rabbinical notion that the Torah (Bible) is absolutely NOT literal, but is rather composed specifically to be read in a multifaceted way; it may have had something to do with Judaism as, above, a practical religion; it may have been because, as scientists, my parents are able to think critically about what they were taught in the arenas of both faith and science.

My fiancé teaches elementary school and her students seem to know more about science than you.

Catholic teaching is that science and faith are not at odds with one another and it is possible to believe what scientists say about the Earth's age and in God.

Fortunately, we adjourned to his house after the burial and spent the night sharing and reminiscing about how he had bettered our lives and taught us so much about not only science but also being decent to people and forming and maintaining relationships.

He wants religion to be presented as forcefully as science or economics - and thus goes far beyond what «teaching about religion» usually means.

This is also indicated by the aim of IM as enunciated in chapter one: «The object of the following chapters is not so much to teach mathematics, but to enable the students from the very beginning of their course to know what the science is about, and why it is necessarily the foundation of exact thought as applied to natural phenomena» (IM 2).