Sentences with phrase «about than their marriages»

Now Ashley Madison hack victims have more to worry about than their marriages.

Not exact matches

Unless you're living in a society with arranged marriages, however, this is much more about your children's choices than anything you can do for them as a parent.
It might sound like I'm talking about marriage rather than business but how you know when you've found the right investor might be answered in part by the questions asked.
According to research by Jeffrey Dew, a faculty fellow with the University of Virginia's National Marriage Project, couples who fight about finances once a week are 30 % more likely to divorce than those who disagree on the topic a few times per month.
It shows that, even when controlling for age, marriage rates, and price - to - income ratios (home value to income ratios), the Hispanic or Latino homeownership rate is still about 11 percent lower than the white homeownership rate, suggesting that factors beyond what is accounted for in the model are affecting the differences.
Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out of wed lock than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the church's say nothing about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in sin, talk about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not religious marriage, what a bunch of hipocrites..
That's a good point, our government is racking up debt faster than locust on a wheat field, and we're arguing about gay - marriage, race and still abortion issues.
They say marriage teaches you more about selflessness than you ever wanted to know.
So I think your blog might qualify... though again, it is more of a blog about parenting and marriage than about Scripture and theology, and Paul's is quite a bit like Hyatt's, in that it is about leadership and influence.
This arises from a warped and stunted notion of sexual ethics which offers nothing to say about the subject other than that it's acceptable within marriage and unacceptably wicked in any other context.
Will traditional marriage follow the path of preborn life — an issue moving from judicial activism and socially elite proclamations that a generational shift was «inevitable» and «the debate is over» to our day decades later where the youngsters are more right minded about abortion than their parents.
On an interesting side note, back in my fundie days, I refused to vote for the politicians that supported marriage equality and even wrote a letter to my member to that effect; the only thing I ever felt strongly enough about to actually write rather than be content just signing my name to a petition.
Huckabee's 2008 Iowa victory and Santorum's surge suggest that, in spite of the dominant stereotypes about evangelicals, they value religious authenticity more than rhetoric and care about more issues than gay - marriage and abortion.
It is far more interested in speaking about fossil fuels than the importance of traditional marriage and the procreation of children.
Growth Counseling for Mid-Years Couples has something to say about marriages which are already more than a few years old.
Marriage is about sacrifice rather than having all your needs met because the blessing lies in that sanctification.
However, seeing that my recent pattern of caring about work over marriage had produced little more than paying bills and a miserable wife, I figured giving the philosophy a test drive couldn't hurt.
That's not the case with same - s3x marriage, which people are trying to be normalized on every front, and this is more than enough reason for Graham to issue a statement about it.
Plus, talking up religious liberty is likely less of a turnoff for moderate voters than is talk about bans on abortion and gay marriage, traditionally the top concerns of religious conservatives.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
For Christians, marriage is about more than just companionship.
I was more confused about marriage, about my purpose in life, about whether or not God even led me to where I am today than ever before.
The Bible is much clearer about divorce than it is gay marriage.
«What young people really need is not more talk about the mechanics of sex and contraception, but encouragement to develop the character qualities of stability, faithfulness and commitment - the qualities they will need to build a strong and lasting marriage based on something that runs deeper than feelings and physical attraction.»
tradition hard to break.the tradition of marriage is older and more meaningful than any other we know it crosses all religions and non religions, and races and cultures.it won't change easy.calling it something else for some people may make it easier to change.but what about those people who want that time tested tradition for themselves for their own self worth.it is a civil right give it to them today.this issues has divided my community as much as any other, but as we have fought to gain right after right, we have lost sight that all deserve the right of freedom of happiness.No gayness here, just can't fight the battle to keep someone down after being held down
As they worked through this change, Jason and Alise discovered that there was much more holding their marriage together than pulling it apart, and they began to work in their faith communities to bring about a greater understanding of what the others actually believe and to bring about a better dialog between atheists and Christians.
Younger Christians are weary of pitched cultural battles and are longing for the «real Jesus» — a Jesus who talks more about washing feet and feeding the poor than flashpoint issues like same - sex marriage and the sanctity of life.
I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».
Hey black pastors how about you focus on black on black violence, or blacks low graduation rates and low education, or the drug epidemic, or the fact that black men abandon their children at a higher rate than other races... yeah ga. y marriage should be a big issue... what a fvcking joke...
Gay marriage will eventually be settled in the courts and you won't have a thing to say about it that will matter anymore than your blather here.
This I can not square away — however, I look at the gay issue much differently than most — I think it's much to complicated and we are jumping the gun by saying we just accept gay marriage — or it's an evil sin — what about the science that says testosterone starts forming around the babies brain when they are only 8 weeks into the womb?
Rather than rejecting it, we should learn from it... like learning that marriage should be more about what is in your heart rather than what is between your legs and family is more about uniting people in a nurturing home than uniting a sperm with an egg.
Mark Driscoll tells CNN that when people (like me) raise concerns about the content of his latest book on sex and marriage, it «reveals more of their own struggles than actual problems with the book.»
Against my usually - better - than - this judgement, I began to write online about my marriage a few years ago.
Those who argue against same - sex marriage on the basis of its potential to diminish the effectiveness of the institution as a solid foundation for social stability have not thought about the price we have already paid for this personal freedom, or the historical reality that most citizens of Western Nations have already chosen to pay it rather than choose the relative social stability / security of tribalistic collectivism.
Even though millennials feel more open to things like pre-marital sex and same - sex marriage than their older siblings and parents and grandparents, they still feel conflicted about abortion.»
Others, confused about essences and accidents, misconstrue the argument as entailing that infertile couples, the elderly, and adoptive parents have second - class marriages worthy of less dignity than those of their fertile peers.
Also, I hear that the rights of registered partners are about equal to married couples in Sweden, so no need to worry about that in your case: — RRB - My parents are celebrating their 40th anniversary this year, so I'm a little more optimistic about marriage than you are.
so we're like not official but we already are sorta dating and sorta have spending life together plans and sorta have marriage plans part of it is that like her sister would prob go off the deep end more if we announced it but her parents joke about the idea more than we've actually discussed it so it's like a weird pseudo thing
I literally know more detailed information about the inner workings of Cena and Nikki's relationship than I do the marriages of my own siblings and I don't even regularly watch the reality show.
While the conversation lately has been about how many socioeconomically disadvantaged women are having children outside of marriage as well as the rise in choice motherhood, don't be surprised if we start talking instead about how more young couples are finding that it's a much better deal — and a heck of a lot easier — to find someone who'll be a good person to co-parent with than it is finding a soul mate.
I watch porn, more than I'd like, and I'm really getting pissed off about the situation but I don't want to ruin my marriage or leave my wife or daughter.
Instead of wringing our hands about so - called gray divorces and seeing those marriages as failures, perhaps we should consider marriage as more «till the kids part» than «till death do us part.»
I can't think of a better way to celebrate love, regardless of Valentine's Day and National Marriage Week, than thinking about how we could make marriage better fit for who we are and how we live today — even if that means there's no such thing as mMarriage Week, than thinking about how we could make marriage better fit for who we are and how we live today — even if that means there's no such thing as mmarriage better fit for who we are and how we live today — even if that means there's no such thing as marriagemarriage.
Sadly, she is wrong in believing that «being a good wife shouldn't be any different than being a good husband»; an overwhelming number of never - married women want a husband who has a steady job (while men say they favor someone who shares their ideas about raising children) and that male - as - provider model most likely perpetuates gendered expectations when it comes to marriage.
I am quite leary about the institute's agenda as one of the researchers is none other than Mark Regnerus, who admits to using bad data to support his theory that gay parents and marriage is bad for kids.
And while many worried about how the legalization of marriage for same - sex couples would be a «slippery slope» to marriage among more than two partners, my question is — why is that a bad thing if it's among consenting adults, especially if it would benefit women?
That speaks more about them as a couple than marriage per se.
The post dates back to 2014, but regardless — the recent comments indicate a certain percentage of wives and husbands are not getting their sexual needs met, even though in many other ways their marriage is comfortable and their husband or wife (and, despite the stereotypes, their are more wives complaining about disinterested husbands than vice-versa) is «wonderful» or a «great father / mother.»
Nothing will make you think more about what marriage is about than a divorce.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z