There are five propositions that Canada's law societies must accept if their statements as to what they refer to as their «concern
about the access to justice problem» are to have credibility:
There are five propositions that Canada's law societies must accept if their statements as to what they refer to as their «concern
about the access to justice problem» are to... [more]
Ross's thoughts
about the access to justice problem in this country, and why he believes it's important for attorneys to find creative ways to work with clients within their budget
Tyler Todd talks
about the access to justice problem and how blockchain and other technology could be a solution.
Not exact matches
The proof of the importance of that difference lies in the fact that all of the reports written, and all of the conferences held
about this «
access to justice»
problem and
about LAO, all failed
to examine LAO LAW.
The fact that the majority of Canadians can not afford
to seek
justice through the current system is a
problem which far outstrips in magnitude concerns
about maximizing procedural and due process protections for those litigants who are presently able
to access the system.
This paragraph in particular of Malcolm Mercer's article obscures the law society's great negligence in failing
to try
to solve the
problem, «If we are serious
about the
access to justice gap, we should accept that no one solution will slay the
access dragon.
For months, representatives from the
Access to Justice Commission and legal aid groups have been meeting with members of the Legislature's Joint Finance Committee and the Governor's staff
to talk
about two things: how legal aid can help Wisconsin residents resolve their legal
problems more efficiently and how that assistance helps the state save money.
That strikes straight
to the heart of the
access to justice conundrum: everyone has lots of ideas
about what the basic
problems are and what could be done
to fix them, but there appears
to be more eagerness
to discuss the issue than
to deal with it.
I say «business» advisedly because it costs money
to hire the lawyers necessary
to know what the words might actually mean, and this sets up an «
access to justice»
problem with which we're all familiar and
about which we seem
to be floundering right now.
«I have spoken
about how
access to justice on both the civil side and the criminal side is the most pressing
problem facing our
justice system.
I mean it's this interesting dynamic that we've talked
about on the show before where there's for sure the distinction between
access to justice and
access to lawyers, and that you can have your legal
problem or your life
problem with legal implications solved without necessarily needing
to engage a lawyer, so not all
access to justice problems are
access to lawyer
problems.
Today were replaying a conversation with Brad Clark
about building websites that let him solve potential clients
problems before they meet him and
about his creative
access to justice efforts from Mobile legal clinics
to financial aid for criminal expungement.
While many talk
about access to justice issues, Bauman shook up the legal community when he warned these
problems could be «potentially fatal
to our profession as we know it.»
LAG would suggest that, if the government is serious
about access to justice it needs
to put back capacity into the system so that these people can get early advice on their legal
problems.
Aaron Street: Yeah I mean I think this can be taken too far, so if you had an example like Brad where he only represents criminal defendants and therefore there's no risk of him having a conflict come through the site when he's getting actual information
about actual cases, but you could see in a litigation, let's say a family law lawyer, if their website were trying
to collect information
to provide tools as both an intake and
access to justice solution that you potentially run into tremendous conflicts of interest
problems there and I think obviously any lawyer considering pursuing this for their firm should think through the implications of their particular situation, but I think what Brad's doing is awesome in the context of his criminal law practice and I think there are versions of a similar model that could be used in something like your debt collection defense practice or a small business startup practice or an estate planning practice, but that doesn't mean that it's a model that should be replicated by every lawyer in every practice.
We talked
about an
access to justice gap, but what people are usually talking
about is an
access to lawyers gap because there is actually no gap in the number of people who have their legal
problems solved.
This concept of
access to justice recognizes that factors outside the law can make even «good» law inaccessible, and that a problem that has been framed as legal, may really be about other conditions affecting a person that are outside of the law: Patricia Hughes, Advancing Access to Justice through Generic Solutions: the risk of perpetuating exclusion, 31 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes, Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/view
access to justice recognizes that factors outside the law can make even «good» law inaccessible, and that a problem that has been framed as legal, may really be about other conditions affecting a person that are outside of the law: Patricia Hughes, Advancing Access to Justice through Generic Solutions: the risk of perpetuating exclusion, 31 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes, Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/vie
justice recognizes that factors outside the law can make even «good» law inaccessible, and that a
problem that has been framed as legal, may really be
about other conditions affecting a person that are outside of the law: Patricia Hughes, Advancing
Access to Justice through Generic Solutions: the risk of perpetuating exclusion, 31 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes, Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/view
Access to Justice through Generic Solutions: the risk of perpetuating exclusion, 31 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes, Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/vie
Justice through Generic Solutions: the risk of perpetuating exclusion, 31 Windsor Yearbook of
Access to Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes, Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/view
Access to Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes, Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/vie
Justice 1 (2013)[Hughes,
Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/view
Access to Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/vie
Justice and Generic Solutions], online http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/view/4308.
The national Action Committee on
Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters notes in its final report that only
about 6.5 % of legal
problems ever make it
to court, but it is unlikely in the extreme that so many of the people with high school diplomas or less are bundled into the 93.5 % who manage
to resolve their legal issues outside of court, especially when we know that for people with low incomes, legal issues tend not come one at a time but cluster and multiply into other areas of the law.
They have «
Access to Justice» committees, and they express «concern»
about the
problem, but nothing has happened during all the decades during which this
problem has been inflicting more damage in one day than have all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers in the whole history of Canada, coast
to coast
to coast.
So far in this discussion (after 63 posts) I haven't seen anybody refer
to what the judges have
to say
about any of the array of various long - standing
access to justice problems.
If it were not, the great volume of literature that has been written
about this «
access to justice»
problem since 2007 would not have been published, and the disturbingly high and increasing percentages of unrepresented litigants whom judges are warning are clogging their courts, would not be happening.»
In the United Kingdom, academics Hazel Genn and others have used research
about justiciable
problems to reorient how
access to justice policy is developed, making it more focused the paths
to justice available
to users for resolving their
problems.
It is
about protecting ordinary and vulnerable people and solving their
problems» (see «
Access to justice is a fine concept.
We hear and read a lot
about the
problems with «
access to justice,» and while this may certainly be an issue in the criminal and family law realms, it is virtually non-existent in personal injury litigation.
Sebastian Ko, Regional Director and Senior Legal Counsel of integrated legal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring
about transformational change and solve long unresolved
problems in the law, such as
access to justice.
We agree that there are
problems with the current costs regime but the proposals in the Jackson Report which the government has adopted will reduce
access to justice for ordinary citizens
to the advantage of insurers and business and we can not keep quiet
about that.»
After engaging this afternoon in a discussion
about a number of issues related
to ongoing
access to justice, I continued thinking
about the barriers that stand between ordinary people with legal
problems and their effective
access to justice.
«It's a good opportunity
to contribute
to the community and fill a need, and there is a growing issue in our profession
about access to justice and so it is a way
to help with that
problem as well,» he says.
I have written before
about Parker, in his role as director of the LawX Lab at BYU Law School, a legal design lab in which law students design a solution
to an
access -
to -
justice problem.
A collection of essays
about improving
access to justice... Closing the Justice Gap: some new thinking about an old problem... produced by the legal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth bi
justice... Closing the
Justice Gap: some new thinking about an old problem... produced by the legal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth bi
Justice Gap: some new thinking
about an old
problem... produced by the legal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birthday.
[That doesn't mean the
problem doesn't exist or that they shouldn't care
about access to justice.]
But if more politicians were aware of how serious the
problems of
access to justice are, they might just have been doing more
about them.
ACC Europe — like LegalStart — is diverse, technology and process - driven, concerned
about addressing
access to justice — an acute
problem throughout Europe and North America — and eager
to improve efficiency, automate, and reduce legal cost.
I, along with many of my colleagues in the A2J course, have a genuine interest in learning more
about access to justice and pursuing a legal career with an aim
to fix some of the
access problems.
Litigants in person may have
problems with forms: but they all know
about computers (or their children do) so MCOL has done wonders for their
access to justice.
But what I can say is that is that if we have reached the point that our
justice system is so broken that we have
to resort
to the incarceration of family litigants, based on the subjective assessment of a single
justice who has clearly formed strong opinions
about the culpability of the parties, we have a very big
problem that should be alarming all
access to justice advocates.