Sentences with phrase «about the animal lives»

I live and write on a small farm in New York State, and since my work, most days, means asking questions about the world around me, I find myself wondering about the animals I live with.

Helen Mirren and Danny Devito have joined the voice cast of The One and Only Ivan, a live - action / animation adaptation of K.A. Applegate's book about animals living in a derelict shopping mall.

Tell students that half the groups will research information about animal life in or near the river (s); the other half will research information about plant life in or near the river (s).

For more information about Animal Life Rescue, Red Barn, NC Dog Rescue or It Takes a Village, visit their websites or send an email.

Click here for more information about Animal Life Rescue, to donate toward the nonprofit or to adopt one of its rescue animals.

The SPCA received an anonymous tip about animals living in horrible conditions at a property on Hudson Landing Road in Pajaro.

Not exact matches

You have never in your life seen an email torrent like what happened from the group that are concerned about the health effects on everything from children to animals.

They stretch as far out as 2050 and include all the usual buzzwords about fair trade and sustainability, but also living wages for workers and influencing animal - welfare policy.

If you lived in the jungle and didn't know anything about the animals around you, how long do you think you'd survive?

@ jack3 no you have the right to believe what ever you want, but we might mock you for believing in something that has talking snakes, a story about the world flooding and being able to fit all the animals on the planet on one boat, that believes in magic, that believes a person lived in the belly of a whale, and that people coexisted with dinosaurs all without any actual proof.

But I think in the context of this piece about love and how connections shape lives, the tone of your response devalues humans AND animals.

My life was turned upside down a couple years back in a situation that led to the dissolution of my marriage, I also work in animal rescue, which brings me constant anxiety that animals I know and care about may not make it, and frequently the actual crushing pain of losing them.

It has always been my opinion that when Adam and Eve sinned, (rebellion against God) he showed them how to make clothing from animal skins, warned them life was about to get REALLY difficult and retreated to a safe place in space because He hates sin.

We're not talking about all life forms, we're talking about animals that experience pain.

As an allegory about humanity's moral freedom, the Tree of Life would represent the instinctual innocence of the animals and very young children.

There is something about human beings that is above and beyond the animal instincts that program them to live in their environment.

The variation that actually occurred in the history of life was exactly the sort needed to bring about the complete set of plants and animals that exist today.

And that psychiatrist had told him that unless he threw God away, stopped bothering about morals and his spiritual life, and exploded his animal instincts, he could not be happy.

I'll even offer observations - humans have manipulated existing organisms dna, created new virus and bacteria, clone animals, and attempt to create new animals - yet simple minded folks still reject the idea that another more intelligent creature might have done the same thing and created life on earth in the same fashion while at the same time acknowledging that there is a strong likelihood of other life existing in this universe - talk about being dumbed down and arrogant.

(I interpret «life and death» here to refer to the impermanence spoken of above, also to the fragmentation of values as scattered about, a little in me, some in you, some in other higher animals, indeed as Buddhists assert some even in lower animals, all of these perishable.)

But what about living things, especially animals?

For the talk about the natural changes of human life over the years, together with what externally happened there, is not in essence any different from talking of plant or of animal life.

He then went on to tell us about the history of the universe from the huge explosion of matter and energy (the Big Bang) through the formation of stars and then rocky planets on which complex chemicals were produced, leading to the synthesis of the first molecules of life and the emergence of the plant and animal kingdoms.

Rather, before we make hasty, uninformed guesses about things as enormously complicated as whole organs and animals, we must first look at life's foundation» molecules and cells» to see what natural selection can explain there.

(about 650 to 500 million years ago) 8s)??? 9s) animal life appears in the cambrian explosion (about 540 million years ago) The first Fish appear about 400 million years ago.

Biopolitics seeks, minimally, to bring about those elementary conditions which must be met if life — human, animal, and plant — is to survive at all and, maximally, to make possible the optimum enjoyment of existence.

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

Anyone who sends his or her children to a place where people believe that (i) the entire world was created in 7 days about 6,000 years ago, (ii) a guy lived in a whale, (ii) another guy got two of every animal on the planet on a boat, (iii) guy rose up from the dead and floated up into the clouds... should be banned from reproducing.

For instance, a fellow who says there is no order in nature — nothing like laws of nature — that's not good common sense, because every living animal wants to make expectations about the future on the grounds that there are legitimate expectations about it.

If you accept, as I do absolutely, that this life is all that we have, that we die as animals, that everything about us is finally lost irrevocably, that we go into the night without hope, then that belief must influence how you live your life.

Therefore, Jesus is saying that in contrast to the Pharisees and Scribes, who care exceedingly more about the temporal life of animals, than the eternal well - being of humans — the Kingdom of God is concerned far more with the eternal well being of people as opposed to the temporal well - being of animals.

Funny I never thought of Jesus as having a hercules style body... Just average build... He did work as a capenter and the carpenters I know have good muscle tone... by are not body builder status, Hercules built to excess... They are just like a average farmer, strong and even in muscle tone... Jesus's whole life was about being humble and coming from the low end of the society... he was born with the animals in a very humble place... I do not see him as a super strong human... but then being the son of God, he would have had super powers if he wanted them... he just did not need them...

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

There is a whole theology of the body waiting to be written about embodiment and animal life.

Creationist «well, what about the origin of the universe, the fact that the universe obeys laws, the origins of life on this earth, the fact that the largest «gaps» in the fossil record correspond exactly with the organisms identified in the bible as being created by God, namely fish, birds, land animals and humans»

The difference is that only the mouse of E. B. White's story could, if he lived in today's Manhattan, complain about his family's treatment of him to animal welfare bureaus.

Gen. 3 describes the serpent (nahash in Hebrew) in very un-Satanic-like terms, as «more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made,» and also curses it like a wild animal, stating that it will be cursed «above all livestock and all wild animals,» and also speaks about it «crawling on its belly and eating dust all the days of its life.»

They're much more about living according to nature — or serving the species in the ways nature intends every social animal to do.

Even the point about what is best for other creatures, which may seem very modern, is not without foundation in Hebrew Scriptures in such passages as the law against taking the hen - bird as well as the eggs from the nest (Deut 22:6), or this saying from Proverbs: «A righteous man has regard for the life of his beast» (12:10), where, be it noted, the quality that makes a man considerate of his working animals is not prudence or good business sense but «righteousness,» a point all the more significant when we remember that in the Hebrew Scriptures one of the marks of righteousness is not mere evenhandedness but active favor to the weak and deprived.

The writer seems to be saying that animal life, whether on land or in the sea, is more marvelous than mere plant life, and, although issuing from the womb of the earth and from the waters, required a special operation of God to bring it about.

He took Islam seriously and saw that Christianity had to address the continent's appalling poverty: «How do you speak about a God who loves you, a redeemer, a saviour, when you live like an animal?»

The public consensus veers between sympathy for animal rights — although it is only some animals that are included, you do no hear much about the «rights» of insects and spiders, for example — and uncertainty about the moral boundaries surrounding human life and death — although, of course, outright murder is still regarded as a crime.

Being vegan is about excluding animal products from ALL aspects of your life out of respect for animals.

If a chef compiled all the ingredients the animal you were about to consume ate during its life into a dish or centerpiece, what would that look like?

Before you go shopping, learn about the lives of the animals we use as fabric and accessories.

Madalyn Crum is a Sales and Marketing Coordinator at Nutiva who is passionate about healthy living and animal rights.

Hi Rob — Sometimes I think discussions about this can get incredibly heated, and I think each to his own, but the devastation a lot of palm oil causes to rainforests and the animals who live there make a lot of vegans want to choose to go without — I think I have read somewhere that earth balance use sustainable palm oil — not grown in the rainforests, some people find it easier to avoid palm oil all together as it can be hard to check where it is from with each product.

I recently saw a documentary, called «Food Inc.» I was already on the fence about not eating meat before and now that I've seen how animals are treated and the disgusting ways they're forced to live until they're killed for their meat has completely opened my eyes.

While I personally have no interest in consuming animals I think the safest bet is to buy only from local farmers and chat with them about where they source their animals from, what they're fed, and how their living conditions are.