Sentences with phrase «about the believers of»

I'm curious about the believers of conditional security, since conditional security means grace plus works, and by Romans 11:6 clearly says Grace plus works is no longer grace.

Very funny (funny as in curious) thing about the believers of different religions.

Not exact matches

Instead, he's a believer in «Small Data,» the title of his new book, which he describes as a method that's about «infusing creativity and preserving the instincts» of entrepreneurs, which he says can be their most valuable assets.

«An entrepreneur is naturally optimistic (sometimes to a fault) about the future because of their believer's mindset.

For true believers, it's not just about the price of a single investment, but instead a system that they believe could circumvent traditional governments by creating a decentralized, global financial system that no single entity oversees.

Even if the team at Smync hadn't developed our easy - to - use, powerful platform to grow social word - of - mouth and brand advocacy, we are passionate believers and thought leaders about it.

Bill Slawski of SEOByTheSea — «I'm a firm believer in creating a situation where not only are you focusing upon a permission - based approach, but that you also provide things of such value within your email marketing that people don't think twice about signing up, and wouldn't even consider unsubscribing.

They really don't — the concept of somebody saving their lives from a crucified execution occurring 2,000 years ago is appropriately distant and irrelevant to them, because the vast majority of believers put as much thought and effort into what they believe about their religion as WHY they believe what they believe about their religion.

Too often, as well, believers will label something as being «in God's hands now» when they are entirely capable of doing something about it, but don't have the motivation to actually do it, see?

The passage in Corinthians is about the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the hope that we have as believers in that truth.

Thinking about that I think your right.Or getting all this free attention to promote a book free.We got believers and non-belivbers & do n`t knows.I have a good idea, but I can not prove it.I think whatever or whoever created us exists on the other side of the universe.That would probably be infinity.Then infinity would have to have an intelligence to know all things.Some deep $ h1t man.lol

What I meant by cognitive dissonance, though, is that whole thing about the «institutional» church, throwing a whole tradition, a whole world - wide confession, millions of individual believers into some sort of barrel.

Shamgar, is your claim that, if the church was under greater persecution, we would all agree about these things because the people holding to one side of each of these debates aren't true believers, and so they would leave under persecution?

When looking into the subject of influencers and influencer marketing I've took a different approach asking around people I personally believer will have what to say about it.

Certainly the New Testament talks about the priorities of that churchâ $» Jesus as its sole head and focus, daily encouragement among believers, plural and lateral leadership, open participation, and an environment of freedom so people can grow in him.â $ â $ œLike what I have with Jake?â $ â $ œAnd there will be others God will give you as you simply follow him, â $ John added.

But nice try at deflecting attention from your, or any believer's, inability to answer the most basic of questions about your beliefs.

I am not defined by such labels as atheist or believer, they are just possible words to describe some very miniscule part of what I happen to think about a very basic level of the topic.

As for me, I am done here, I am going to enjoy this beautiful holiday with my family, and hope that some good in this life shines upon some of you... Whatever it is about believers that brings out your hate, I hope you resolve it soon...

Chris Foster talks about life in Cambodia and the importance of mentoring young believers.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

«These two opponents (believers and disbelievers) dispute with each other about their Lord; then as for those who disbelieve, garments of fire will be cut out for them, boiling water will be poured down over their heads.»

But I try not to be a snooty holier than thou Christian and I have a lot of close people surrounding me daily that I would call among my best friends that are non believers, Someday I hope I can help change their minds, but I'm not going to be pushy about it.

I am not sure that a practicing believer of any faith, taking a break from verbosity about their religion, will be any less religious... or gain much insight into the commonality of humanity and human experience.

The first two paragraphs of his article show that he is close - minded as the believers he talks about.

Gospels (the «good news»... by definition self - admitted biased materials) are statements of beliefs for believers about what they already believe.

But there is perhaps a use we might make of the postmodern in apologetics, for the collapse of modernity may allow believers to speak once again about God without defensiveness or self - consciousness, may allow believers both to escape political categorization as liberal or conservative and to escape the modern view that sees political categories as fundamental.

This testimony about Jesus as only a son of David (2 Samuel 7:12 - 14 NIV) who was punished by God with the floggings of men for claiming to be god thus becoming the «bright morning star» (Isa.14: 9 - 20) was revealed through the Bible by Maestro Evangelista in http://www.thename.ph which proves he is the «angel» or messenger sent by Jesus to deliver his testimony or HIS ADMISSION that he is not a son of God and as the «bright morning star «to all churches (or believers of Jesus) thus nullifying the «antichrist» lie made by the apostle John.

I am VERY tired of people preaching to me and others about how «a Christian would and should act» when the hypocrisy of the matter is that I, a «none believer» practice «The Golden Rule» more than most!

If we are true believers of God and we have to ensure that what we have been believing has been the Truth as ordained by God and have been doing good we will see at the time of death Heaven the place we are going to, So when we see heaven our worldly posessions like family, wealth etc go into oblivion and we are not concerned the least about them since what we are now going into will dazzle us so much.

Well, given that many atheists are actually more informed (as studies have confirmed) than believers, a better analogy would be that it's like asking a former professional chemist now teaching an English class about chemistry instead of asking the Chemistry teacher who never made it past chem 101 as an undergrad.

There are reasons, formidable reasons, why generations of believers over thousands of years have identified with Churchian teaching about sin and guilt.

About 75 % of europeans are non believers and we are a nation of 75 % believers.

Jesus is just a belief shared by a fraction of the world's population, and there are thousands of conflicting opinions about him even amongst his strongest believers.

Because either they never hear about «the rapture» or they were never believers in this silly way of thinking.

Focus on the positive Dorian, there are lot of things to cry and complain about if you want to see them, but its not the fault of believers of Christ.

In a 2000 interview with Women's Quarterly, the great critic displayed about as much indifference to the existence of God as is humanly possible; he had neither the commitment of a true believer nor the paradoxical loyalty of the atheist who kicks against the pricks:

They should pick some lead from western nation about secularism, freedom of speech and liberty and manage their affairs in those terms with believers and nonbelievers equally.

One thing I find entertaining about believers is that they absolutely get so bent out of shape at the thought of equality for everyone, and not only to those who goose - step to their own particular brand of «right».

And as a point of interest, it talks about non believers.

One thing about all these books, including the bible is that someone is getting rich by printing them and everything is of the fanatatic believer ignorance.

believer fred, i think you said something about clinging to death helplessly, and depriving a child of the light... in different words.

Atheists decry the claim of Christianity to having truth exclusive to only believers, without realizing that the claims they make about truth and reality actually are just as exclusive and less factually - based.

Could it be because about 80 % of all abortions in the USA are had by believers?

The «faith» of the «believers - only» is in their own theological beliefs about God, not in God.

Otherwise none of us have a right to bitch about believers.

Every true believer of every one of the thousands of gods that humanity has worshiped throughout history «experienced» the truth about their gods.

If God were real, given that there are billions of believers and over a billion Christians, if God cared about us so much it seems to me there would be more people who had the «proof» you claim to have.

What might this mean for the present discussion about the place in the church of homosexually oriented believers?

If «believers» aligned their right beliefs with right practice, fewer church members would look elsewhere for critically important discussions about caring, inclusiveness, open dialogue, ethical decision - making, and shared doubts in the context of a disturbing contemporary polarized culture.

His instruction is for a specific group of believers in Corinth about 2000 years ago who were dealing with some very specific issues.