Sentences with phrase «about the big bang»

We talked about the big bang theory in which life started on earth.

So your claim about big bang as though its a fact is poor.

If you really do think you know so much about the big bang, tell me... where did that little tiny mass that exploded eons ago come from?

Here's another one: An entirely natural wormhole opened in the space - time continuum, and a guy from the present got sent into the past, and told someone about the Big bang theory, and that story made it into the Quran.

How would a person living in a desert know these things without actually someone telling him this?!!! And who is that someone?!!! No one at that time knew anything about big bang theory?!! The actual translation of the arabic word رتقا is it was like a fabric that got torn apart?!!! Isn't that big bang?!! And the other part that was proven too is that everything alive needs water to live?!!! How did they know that then?!!! Islam and science support each other and science only getting to prove things now which was mentioned 1500 years ago in the Quran!!!

rogerb12b, instead of listening to your parents, you decided to listen to liars tell you stories about the big bang or evolution that you are the survival of the fittest.

To those who think attributing scientific results to God is a poor argument, just think about the big bang... it probably happened but where did the atoms come from to create the big bang?

same goes for phyiscs... they now know everything about the big bang, except for what a actually caused it....

It's amazing that people know about big bang theory that explans how the universe began.

I do not see anyone other than you even talk about big bang theory and now you accuse someone else of not knowing it from evolution.

We never did get to finish our conversation about the big bang by the way, our conversation got deleted before you had a chance to respond.

I gave you that book reference because you were asking real questions about the big bang.

The author, Vasko Kohlmayer, wrote about his thoughts about the big bang and atheist / agnostic views towards it and then, in the very next paragraph, wrotre «Richard Dawkins suggested that it [life] may have been seeded on this earth by aliens».

When I read about the big bang I can say ok, sounds logical but who flipped the switch.

That is like saying that you would like information about the big bang from lay people who have no strong feelings one way or another about the origins of the universe and no personal expertise in astrophysics.

This includes videos about the big bang, the size of the universe and a short powerpoint with pictures of earth to play while students enter to create that SMSC «awe and wonder» feeling.

This is also apparent from your comment about the big bang.

Not exact matches

The biggest problem with business plans is that they offer pages of blah, blah, blah about the wonderfulness of the entrepreneur and the whiz - bang product followed by a few measly paragraphs about how every person in China is going to be a customer.

It's reasonable to think that there are other realities not represented by our big bang; it's NOT reasonable to make claims about beings who live outside our big bang and what they want for our species and whatnot.

I watch the shows about the universe, big bang, explanations as to where an how and why our galaxy is moving and expanding.

evolution has nothing to say about the «big bang» it would be just as strange to say that «god» or some intelligence made the world and the universe, as you have to come to the obvious questions again..

ATHEISM does not make claims about what was before the BIG BANG either.

Take the big bang into account and you're left thinking about where the space came from in order for it to expand as far as it has.

, why did this have to happen that the big bang should bring about self aware beings who starts to question their existence itself?

I agree with the big bang guy... if we talk about proof... let's first figure where we all came from... we have all heard this «Well we know what happened after the big bang... but have no clue what came before» well first figure that out... and if you can't in the next 20 years then there has to be something beyond Physics...

When the question was asked of Nye about where did all the atoms come from for the big - bang... I thought his answer of «don't know» was good.

I don't know about you, but I find it hard to believe that from out of the big bang, a creative intelligence can result.

There was an article recently about a young boy (12ish) who is the new math genius in the making and he is working on debunking the big bang theory with science.

When we are talking about living beings and the world we live in which is so perfectly designed, there is no possible way this is all random and happened by a «big bang theory» which actually requires something to initiate a big bang to begin with.

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

I'm well versed in the scientific method and that has led me to believe that «big bang theory» is about as supportable as the «flat earth theory» of the 16th century.

There is an odd reticence about the healings in the lessons for this Sunday — there's an expectation of big - bang pyrotechnics, followed by a matter - of - factness in the healings that seems to disappoint.

The assumption was on the part of the religious that what we do not understand must be the work of a god — except that over the last few centuries we understand more about creation — big bang, evolution, etc. which shows those creation stories to be incorrect.

Remarkable and significant as is the emergence of self - conscious persons by natural processes from the original «hot big bang» from which the universe has expanded over the last 10 - 20 thousand million years, this must not be allowed to obscure another fact about humanity, namely its relatively recent arrival in the universe, even on a time - scale of the history of the Earth.

Although science can state a great deal about what followed after the big bang, it can not in fact explain how «something» (the energy of the universe compressed into a volume the size of a golf ball) arose from nothing beforehand.

It tells us something about what happened after or during the big bang.

The big bang proves a creation of our Universe and that makes her feel good about her assumptions about «God.»

Some people talk about the creation of the universe as a big bang, while it is really a little ripple.

Absolutely nothing about the study of cosmology of the early universe and big bang would lead to the conclusion that it somehow required action or planning.

Boston, why wasn't it in genesis, they wouldn't have had a clue about what inflation or big bang is.

Dr. Hawking would agree with everything I said about what modern astrophysicists believe happened in the first few milliseconds of the big bang.

Honestly I'm not sure the big bang theory is the answer to how everything began, and I wonder about it all the time.

Get a good book and forget about it, or turn on that big bang tv show — lot more interesting.

lol — ah yes our resident armchair cosmologist is here I see to set us all straight on what we know about the state of things before the big bang.

I am not as high profile as you but if I were, it would be like me telling you not to teach your kids about evolution or the big bang theory.

I know that i have prayed and things changed for the good and i have learned that faith requires a courage that atheist just don't have, so now you atheist can start your shallow explanations about how you can think for yourselves and your laughable big bang theories and your evolved from monkeys nonsense and i'll just stay with truth.

What about pure science or theoretical physics (as opposed to merely experimental physics — I was reminded of the deep significance of that distinction from watching THE BIG BANG THEORY)?

Current scientific thought is that the universe began with a «big bang» about 13 - 14 billion years ago.

Far more proof has been presented scientifically about evolution and the big bang theory than by believing in a god.

So they're kind of the same in some deep mathematical sense, and as of today we don't really know what happens at the center of a black hole and we don't really know what happened at the moment of the big bang so these are two puzzles that are cousins of one another and anything that we learn about one is certainly going to shed light on the other.»