Sentences with phrase «about the divorce with»

Talking about divorce with your spouse can be very difficult.

I have recommendations for communication skills, affair recovery and talking about divorce with your kids.

Here are two strategies that you can use when talking about divorce with your kids:

Some call it «the crazy time» and there is even a book about divorce with this title.

Now, no matter where you are, no matter what time of the day or night, you can get the information you need about your divorce with the Divorce Source IPhone Divorce Application (The Divorce Encyclopedia).

A guide that answers teenagers» tough questions about divorce with honesty and sensitivity.

In Part 1 of this series, we shared some tips on how to handle the initial conversation about divorce with children, emphasizing the importance of telling the truth and telling children at the right time.

By Tracy McConaghie, LCSW In Part 1 of this series, we shared some tips on how to handle the initial conversation about divorce with children, emphasizing the importance of telling the truth and telling children at the right time.

There's really only the one opportunity to have this important first talk about the divorce with your children.

Talk about your divorce with their teachers, caregivers and friends» parents.

Not exact matches

Once you've made decision to divorce, start a conversation about what should happen with the business.

The digital world provides you capabilities to target contexts, keywords or even specific businesses, just like traditional marketing lists can come with information about birth dates, divorces, new parents or net worth.

The EU has refused to talk about future trading arrangements with the U.K. — even on a two - year «transitional» arrangement proposed by May — until there is «sufficient progress» on the divorce settlement.

That financier's soon - to - be ex-wife at the time found his diary, which was filled with writings about encounters with Wood, who was soon - to - be divorced as well.

According to research by Jeffrey Dew, a faculty fellow with the University of Virginia's National Marriage Project, couples who fight about finances once a week are 30 % more likely to divorce than those who disagree on the topic a few times per month.

In this case, speak with a lawyer about what's called a post-nuptial agreement if you want to keep the business from being a potential factor in a divorce, says Gilden.

I got divorced about 5.5 years ago with a negative net worth, and through a combination of reasonable spending (middle class standard of living), investment returns (thank you great bull market!)

(Barron's) • In Search of the Perfect Recession Indicator (Philosophical Economics) • A Fireside Chat With Charlie Munger (MoneyBeat) • Complexity theory and financial regulation (Science) • Five Pieces of Conventional Wisdom That Make Smart Investors Look Dumb (CFA Institute) • This Lawyer Is Hollywood's Complete Divorce Solution (Bloomberg) • Curiosity update, sols 1218 - 1249: Digging in the sand at Mar's Bagnold Dunes (Planetary Society) • The Plot to Take Down a Fox News Analyst (NYT) • Ask the aged: Who better to answer questions about the purpose of life than someone who has been living theirs for a long time?

After seeking the guidance of a qualified attorney who is knowledgeable about relevant state laws to dividing assets, you can secure a comfortable retirement nest egg by working with a divorce financial planner to assess your retirement planning options and build a sound foundation for your late - in - life finances.

When he had to squeeze extra floors into a new building, he called Sandy Lindenbaum, a zoning - law guru who called himself «the last of the gunslingers»; when he needed the New Jersey Casino Control Commission to see things his way, he turned to Atlantic City fixture Nick Ribis; when he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily harm.

But now, having daughter, Bryn, 4, and the fact that she's still recovering from her contentious divorce battle with Hoppy, she says, «The decisions I make affect other people... some things about my personal life will remain private.»

This week, #HipNJ is featuring Matt Sweetwood — author, entrepreneur, single - father and life coach — whose most recent project, a self - help book entitled Leader of the Pack, was recently celebrated at Till & Sprocket NYC with a stimulating discussion about marriage, divorce, parenthood, and leadership.

The groundbreaking work that Daniel Patrick Moynihan did in 1965, on the black family, is an example — along with the critical research of psychologist Judith Wallerstein over several decades on the impact of divorce on children; Barbara Dafoe Whitehead's well - known work on the outcomes of single parenthood for children; Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur's seminal book, Growing Up with a Single Parent; and David Blankenhorn's Fatherless America, another lengthy summarization of the bad empirical news about family breakup.

I'm also quite capable of debating with him about whether or not government marriage in New York should allow no - fault divorce or whether married couples (as defined by the state!)

same with divorce... God hates divorce... read what Jesus says to the Jewish leaders about that...

Again, I really want to stress this is not about the messy never ending post divorce antics with an NPD but the culture of leaders in this publishing / speaking / minor celebrity circle that have smeared names and reputations in order to appear one way while behind the scenes another story is going on.

I am not in contact w / any of them, have no clue about what they are thinking, but I know if it were me I wouldn't want to force or participate in an online debate with a group of virtual strangers over the intimate details of a personal divorce.

First there's a question about divorce (with a follow - up...

As for speaking with a divorced person or adulterer that lies, believe me, they get called on the carpet too about their lying ways.

In Matthew 19, the Pharisees asked Him about divorce, hoping to trap Him into disagreeing with Moses and therefore finding reason for condemning Him.

In his dialogue with the Pharisees about the legality of divorce, 5 Jesus offers a precious departure point for the synod participants.

Faced with serious financial loss — house, job, divorce, (yeah, by that point, all either party cares about are money and ownership, aka «custody,»)-- WATCH OUT!

It would be quite in keeping with the Lukan practice to prefer a version of a saying he found in another source to that of Mark, as, for example, he prefers the Q version of the teaching about divorce (Luke 16.18 / / Matt.

With buzz about #tomkat & #scientology, interesting to note there's no doctrine against divorce; founder L. Ron Hubbard married 3 times

Family Tree was inspired by a woman whose father left her to chase a homosexual lifestyle and contracted AIDS after a volatile relationship with her mother, and Two Houses is about a person wrestling with his parent's divorce and the platitudes he received.

Wallerstein is also concerned about the reluctance of religious institutions to deal with divorce.

It is important to remember when Jesus is teaching about adultery in Matthew chapter 19 that what he is saying is that if someone divorces for any reason other than adultery that the offending party has only two choices reconcile with their spouse or remain single and live as a widow the rest of their days.

They made loud speeches about divorce, adultery and fasting, hoping in vain to coerce him into agreeing with them.

Among the best is that by Professor Robert Fastiggi who wrote, «I agree with Pope Francis that there are many beautiful insights about marriage» in Cardinal Kasper's presentation, but on the issue of communion for the divorced and remarried, Kasper is decidedly wrong, for reasons laid out by Fastiggi and by Francis's own doctrinal chief, Gerhard Cardinal Muller.

People too often talk about Jesus aside from his words, about his compassion towards all, while they fail to wrestle with some of his steepest moral teachings: «Whoever divorces his wife... and marries another, commits adultery; Everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart; If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away; I have come to bring not peace but the sword; Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me» (Mt 19:9, 5:28, 5:30, 10:14, 10:37).

If a significant number of theologians, bishops, and priests operate with a concept of conscience (and perhaps seemingly with the Pope's blessing) that reduces objective absolute moral norms to optional guidelines, that concept will free Catholics individually to determine what is right and wrong not just about divorce and remarriage, but about many other issues.

And why aren't they concerned with topics that Jesus actually spoke about, like divorce and remarriage?

ok well in the bible it is against divorce also but god forgives to but it is still wrong and yes i am from nc and i do live in catawba country where this took place but i do nt have to sit around and watch people make out with each other and u know lesbians and gays should read the bible more pentcosal think the same way about that it is wrong for a man and man to be togather and a woman and woman to be togather and some of you people are just plan stupid and i think that some of you just need to think it is god place to judge this pastor and it might be old fashion but back in the ol days we did nt have all this volice and all these crimes but look now there is alot of crime and volice and all we are doing is mad that a pastor said how he felt about gays and lesbiens

Christians who ACTUALLY care about sinners would be dealing with the far greater number of Christian ADULTERERS who divorce and remarry according to the Bible.

Now it is about the proper roles of men and women, same - sex unions and divorce and having children and a host of other questions once thought not to be political, and all of them somehow entangled with and ever returning to the conflict created by the Roe v. Wade discovery in the Constitution of an unlimited abortion license.

What I find puzzling is the obsession with consensual and faithful gay relationships when Scripture says much more about divorce and remarriage (every single sex act with a second spouse is ALWAYS adultery unless someone is unfaithful and that the only moral choice is reconciliation with your first spouse or lifetime celibacy — 1 Cor 7:10 - 11), charging interest on a loan, our moral obligation toward the poor and other things most conservative Christians ignore.

True to form, Pope Francis» comments about communion for the divorced and remarried suggest affinity with both sides of the argument.

In a few matters, we do not speak with one voice: We hold somewhat different views about the morality of contraception, the legitimacy of divorce, and clerical celibacy.

No one in a remotely healthy marriage would ever wonder about how much they could get away with before their spouse would divorce them, for example.

Boldest: Kristin Tennant at The Huffington Post with «What the Church Needs to Understand About Divorce»