With barely more than a glimpse at a quote within the article about «we feel strongly responsible to participate in tackling the issue of climate change,» I could already guess where this group was headed and who they relied on for their diatribe
about the global warming issue.
Not just anyone warrants the attention of the European rapid response team: only those who get media attention and refuse to stay «on message»
about global warming issues get the Carbon Brief treatment.
This ideal was so overwhelming that it is little more than the lack of this ideal among news reports of climate studies that has made me a skeptic
about the global warming issue.
For over two decades, both the overall enviro - activist community and the mainstream media have had what amounts to nearly absolute control over framing the public narrative
about the global warming issue.
If the company later contradicted warnings
about global warming issued by scientists it funded in the 1980s, that would be justified by the fact that those warnings were almost certainly wrong.
It's an otherwise quite good US news exposé public broadcasting series that has inexplicably biased reports
about the global warming issue.
... We've also participated in a pilot project to measure public opinion
about the global warming issue and to see if a factual, science - based public information campaign can have an impact.
But it should be emphasized that, although his points on the anti-intellectualism of creation science and lousy civics knowledge are sound, when he surrounds that with misdirection and literally unsupportable talking points
about the global warming issue, his message looks less like one of genuine concern and more like a subtle excuse to validate global warming propaganda.
And the larger question is, why do no others corroborate his accusation that skeptic scientists were paid to lie to the public by fossil fuel interests
about the global warming issue?
People who don't know much
about the global warming issue might find that student's paper disturbingly compelling at first glance, but the fatal problem within it arises from elemental examination of her assertions and citations, of which she apparently did not question on her own, including an assertion no further than the third sentence of her introduction about Ross Gelbspan being an «expert.»
Other than stating that «climate change is not a hoax» during his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, President Obama hasn't had much to say
about global warming issues throughout his re-election campaign.
He added that misinformation can be tagged culprit in Americans not hearing
about global warming issues frequently.
Not exact matches
Here, Nyhan decided to apply it in an unrelated context: Could recalling a time when you felt good
about yourself make you more broad - minded
about highly politicized
issues, like the Iraq surge or
global warming?
A gifted child may be able to participate in adult conversations
about issues such as
global warming or world hunger one minute and the next minute cry and whine because a sibling took a favorite toy.
Although Margaret Thatcher was the first world leader to warn
about the threat of
global warming, and although David Cameron famously highlighted the
issue too, other prominent Conservatives including Nigel Lawson and Peter Lilley have been outspoken in their opposition to the mainstream agenda on climate change.
Governor Schwarzenegger was also clear what he thought
about Washington on the
issue of climate change, telling reporters: «California will not wait for our federal government to take strong action on
global warming.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo in a speech Wednesday in New York City at the Flatiron Institute in New York City said he was worried
about the complex world being left to the next generation, pointing to
issues ranging from North Korea, to terrorism and eluding to
global warming.
When civil liberties are under attack,
global warming remains one of the great
issues of our age, Heathrow is a battle
about to get louder, migrants need defenders and Cameron restraints to stop him repeating the mistake of Libya by bombing in Syria after the slaughter on Syria's sunbeds, this could be a Lib Dem moment.
That said, in general - in the United States, at least - the
issue isn't so much
about denying
global warming as much as it is
about protecting and favoring the major fossil fuel industries:
A study proposes that fear - based messaging
about an
issue like
global warming may encourage the audience to dismiss it.
Related sites An interview with Max Levitan Evolutionary Ecology Research (May
issue) Frequently Asked Questions
About Global Warming
«The
issue should no longer be whether
global warming is occurring, but what is the rate of
warming, what is its practical significance, and what should be done
about it.»
If you believe, along with almost every scientist who has studied the
issue, that
global warming poses a genuine threat to humanity, doesn't this suggest that we should be doing something
about it?
This approach also relieves pressure on politicians who want to do something
about global warming but don't want to impose burdens on the public, a key consideration at a time when high fuel prices and the economy are explosive
issues.
And having testified since the 1970s
about the threat of
global warming, he had seen plenty of progress on public acceptance of the
issue.
Lomborg, a Danish political scientist with a background in statistics, argues in his text that claims made by environmentalists
about global warming, overpopulation, energy, deforestation, species loss, water shortages, and a variety of other
issues are exaggerations unsupported by a proper analysis of environmental data.
«It describes a natural experiment — the introduction of a papal encyclical — on attitudes
about a critical social
issue,
global warming.
I feel that it is very unfortunate that we have spent more time worrying
about who has caused
global warming, and who is to blame then to accept that it is a
global issue.
While they will certainly miss out on the pleasure and intellectual excitement that come from knowing how the world works, how much science do they actually need to know to make up their minds
about the
issues surrounding genetic engineering or
global warming?
When we consider
issues that we feel strongly
about (e.g.,
global warming), confirmation bias reaches a new height: it transitions into «motivated reasoning.»
Peter Singer was talking
about the fact that we can often look at
issues of
global poverty or
global warming, we can look at those as technological
issues or such policy
issues.
«Should the public come to believe the scientific
issues are settled, their views
about global warming will change accordingly.
This is especially true for eco-friendly singles who care
about important
issues like
global warming and pollution.
During this trying election year, it's interesting to watch a documentary
about one politician's campaign to educate citizens
about one
issue:
global warming.
After completing the visual effects, but before the movie came out, he felt a pull to do «important work,» and so he left the entertainment industry and started a small nonprofit that teaches people
about global warming and other environmental
issues.
While refutation texts have been widely used to correct misconceptions
about controversial science
issues (e.g.,
global warming, GMOs), to our knowledge they have never been tested to correct misconceptions
about policy.
A gifted child may be able to participate in adult conversations
about issues such as
global warming or world hunger one minute and the next minute cry and whine because a sibling took a favorite toy.
Global warming has become a huge environmental
issue; therefore it has become indispensable to increase awareness and knowledge
about it among general public all over the world.
John Akomfrah's environmentally conscious video installation, Purple, offers dialogues
about climate change by foregrounding
issues such as
global warming, animal extinctions and the plastic ocean.
From big group shows
about gender politics and
global warming to small solo exhibitions reflecting
issues of minority representation, here are the five shows kicking off 2018 with a bang.
Much of the work (from SFr35, 000 to SFr4.5 m,
about # 27,000 to # 3.5 m) involves bold, expressive elements (thick impasto brushstrokes and vibrant colours) to play up the political themes and social commentary that touch on the
issues of the decade (Aids; the Iran - Iraq war; the rise of
global warming; advertising as art)-- from the playful, pop - art figures by Haring and Kenny Scharf (Rosso Ruska Rougette, 1984, first picture), to the street art of Rene Ricard (Poison, 1989, second picture) and Jean - Michel Basquiat (Untitled, 1981, third picture).
But all kidding aside, this is an article
about perceptions and willingness to deal with a long - term
issues, not a verification or denial of
global warming.
But then there is the vexing
issue of why people can't absorb the information
about global warming and take action.
Opinion polls for the past decade have consistently shown that the public would like to see something done
about the
global warming problem, along with many other environmental
issues.
However, the solitary drop in concern this year
about global warming, among the eight specific environmental
issues Gallup tested, suggests that something unique may be happening with the
issue.
I differ, asserting, as I did here the other day, that those most worried
about global warming are already energetically opposed to Trump, while climate change remains a «meh»
issue for middle - of - the - road Americans.
4) Some say that whatever you think
about the dangers of
global warming, this kind of language inevitably becomes the
issue, distracts from the real questions, and could in fact further polarize or paralyze discourse.
Our letter that appeared in the February 14th
issue of Science Magazine was motivated by our concerns
about the widespread news reports, opinion pieces, and blog postings linking this winter's cold weather over the central and eastern U.S. to
global warming.
I just was watching your interview with Michael Shellenberger and reading / listening up on this whole «centrist environmentalist» concept and I have to say, I take
issue with people claiming the longtime «left» environmental movement was all
about being a culture of restriction and somehow not in tune with the idea that this
global warming crisis could lead to newer, alternative, healthy economics of another kind.
I mention this for the following reason: Instead of bickering
about various forms of economic systems, we can get much more concrete by posing the following question to those who want to make strong points
about the free market as it relates to the
global warming issue: