Surely it is the truth
about God in Jesus Christ.
J.P. Fokkelman says that when we read
about God in the Bible, that He is a character — a language construct — a creation of the narrator and the writer.
So I hear you had a «somewhat» different opinion
about God in the video than the one you hold now, with this change has come an aversion to «labels» and previously that you had more invested in the «label» Christian.
Millenials, and all people, should spend less time worrying about being entertained or finding a more traditional ritual (Catholic church not pretentious?????) and should instead be seeking what the REAL TRUTH is
about God in the Bible is.
In conclusion, metaphysics can not tell us the most important things we need to know
about God in order to be saved.
It is all
about God in relationship.
Nevertheless, most of what Whitehead tells
us about God in Religion in the Making is primarily based on the further development of his philosophical thought.
Like most of the rest of the ideas
about God in Process and Reality, it was foreshadowed in Religion in the Making.
They had digested what was taught
about God in the creation story and what was taught about Jesus in the Gospels.
do you have a desire to KNOW, the truth
about God in a world that supresses your soul, like life under a rock?
They will hold that popular religion attempts to think
about this God in terms that actually do not apply at all.
To the extent that traditional theology speaks
about God in himself, he is transcendent; to the extent that it speaks about God's grace, he is immanent.
Jesus is not then in discontinuity with the revelation of God in the Old Testament, but is rather the most clearest example of how to read
about God in the Old Testament.
In the New Testament we find the apostolic church talking
about God in some quite new ways.
The crucivision approach to Scripture allows the revelation of Jesus to be the guide and lens by which we interpret the rest of the revelation
about God in Scripture.
Mascall's argument, we have seen, is that in fact we do discuss meaningfully
about God in these terms without claiming that our use is univocal.
I think we would all agree that if I had a friend who was interacting with children in inappropriate ways (I don't, but hypothetically) that I would be remiss to not step in and stop that behavior; we would all also agree that there are minor doctrinal differences that are not only not destructive but can be help us to think
about God in new and different ways.
for instance, i very much agree with her about how hard care - giving is, but not so much with her assertions
about God in the article.
... Please tell me more of this amazing mind - control miracle that removed the ability of children to pray or talk
about God in school.
In an article, «Hartshorne on Describing God» (MTh 3/2), I argued that while we can appreciate Hartshorne's reasons for wanting to talk
about God in a positive and literal manner, there are certain problematic areas in Hartshorne's own God - talk.
To summarize, by paying attention to the presence and absence of words
about God in both Genesis 39 and the larger context of Genesis 37 - 50, I discerned the significance of Joseph's first words about God.
is Joseph's first speech
about God in the story.
Furthermore, how can Jesus be the exact representation of God, when everything Jesus taught about God seems to contradict what we see
about God in the Old Testament?
Zahl says King can say things
about God in books that pastors can't say in the pulpit.
Joseph's first words
about God in Potiphar's house seem to be a foreshadow of the weighty words of revelation that come at the end.
Theology is nothing if not the interplay of ideas and minds over some of the biggest questions
about God in our day.
Kant set the problem with his argument against any knowledge of the Ding an sich, the thing in itself, and Schleiermacher represents the first great attempt to accept that turn and still talk
about God in a meaningful way.
You may have identified the source of your feelings
about God in what you learned from your father.
CNN having three guest all believing that it is a good idea to promote god or teaching
about god in the schools and not a single guest with different ideas on this subject is just wrong.
This blog post is an invitation to you to invent God, and then tell
me about this God in the comments below.
You don't know what that person is feeling
about God in that moment, and imposing your beliefs, even if it's just quoting scripture, can cause anger, confusion and long - term spiritual baggage.
It is not necessary to know something
about God in order really to believe in Him: many true believers know how to talk to God but not about Him.
It is the book which the Church recommends people to read in order to know
about God in His relation to man and the world, to worship Him intelligently, and to understand the aim and the obligations of human life under His rule.
We have addressed in section II the problems involved in speaking
about God in concepts.
Many exclusivists assume you must KNOW certain ideas
about God in order to be saved in the here and now.
Kaiser's big mistake is his flat - out rejection of the revelation
about God in Jesus Christ.
But his teaching about God, both explicit and implicit, altered the balance and weighting of the ideas already held
about God in such a way as to change the total understanding.
Kaiser's opinion is that God obviously knows everything, and that all the verses in the Bible which seem to indicate otherwise are nothing but anthropomorphisms (speaking
about God in human terms).
The author examines what Whitehead had to say
about God in Process and Reality by dividing the discussion into two parts.
Language
about God in existential terms is grounded in objective reality because God is a creative agent in the world beyond man.
Convinced that in any case almighty controlling power is not what is revealed
about God in the life and teachings of Jesus, I turn to the larger topic.
What is revealed
about God in the Jesus Christ event identifies something about God that is not reducible to generic belief as found in other religions or in the philosophy of religion.
Having considered the development of Whitehead's thought
about God in Science and the Modern World and in Religion in the Making, we now turn to the most important book which he wrote, Process and Reality.
The best way to examine what Whitehead said
about God in Process and Reality is to divide the discussion into two parts, (1) the primordial nature of God and (2) the consequent nature of God.
Let us always be cautious of talking
about God in straightforward language.
The faculty of two esteemed divinity schools have been asked to use more inclusive language to talk
about God in their classrooms.
Interweaving her own tale with the views of people she meets, Evans juxtaposes all of the voices
about God in her life.
instilled sort of independant thoughts
about god in my mind..
«I could choose to believe that everything written
about God in the pages of the Word were true, and that he was going to rescue me and my family.
Men like Martin Luther King, JR have beautiful testimonies
about God in their life.