Often we hear in the FIJA office from or
about jurors who initially voted Not Guilty, but changed their vote to Guilty because they couldn't convince the other jurors.
Not exact matches
«It's OK to exclude people
who can't follow the law and their oaths as
jurors, but you can't say that anyone with qualms
about capital punishment is ineligible,» Richard Re, an assistant law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, told Business Insider in an email.
«And you have to think
about whether you really want
jurors who don't have knowledge or opinions.
The
jurors listened as lawyers argued that the trial was
about the rights of midwives and parents to choose home birth, and they were aware of the daily presence of midwife advocates
who filled the courtroom in support of Cryns.
Within a minute of Lacewell taking the stand, prosecutors, seeking to put a face on
who they were
about to talk
about with Lacewell, showed
jurors a large image of Cuomo on a screen in the courtroom.
Prospective
jurors will be asked on a soon - to - be-finalized questionnaire if they «have any strong feelings
about people
who contribute to political candidates that might make it difficult» for them to be fair and impartial.
She is particularly knowledgeable
about access issues in the courts and sensitive to reasonable accommodation of PWDs
who would appear before her as attorneys, witnesses and
jurors.
He said he was satisfied that none had read
about the case and that the only
juror who looked at the paper just read
about the New York Rangers» Stanley Cup bid.
The goal of the government and the defense is to identify
jurors who might have made up their minds
about the guilt or innocence of Mr. Silver,
who was forced to step down as speaker of the New York Assembly after his arrest in January.
Other witnesses on Monday included former Assistant Attorney General Richard Rodgers,
who told
jurors about reforms instituted in 2007 by then - Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, now, of course, the governor.
For example,
jurors tend to give more weight to the testimony of eyewitnesses
who report that they are very sure
about their identifications even though most studies indicate that highly confident eyewitnesses are generally only slightly more accurate — and sometimes no more so — than those
who are less confident.
«Rememory» star and Sundance
juror Peter Dinklage, «Underground» stars Jurnee Smollett - Bell and Aldis Hodge, «Bitch» director Marianna Palka, «XX» director Roxanne Benjamin and the «Lethal Ladies» of the Baltimore Leadership School for Young Women,
who star in the buzzed
about Sundance documentary «Step,» also joined the march.
The
jurors — filmmaker Emily Yoshida, film critic Justin Chang, and IMDb founder Col Needham — also singled out director Carly Stone's comedy «The New Romantic,»
about a college girl
who starts dating older men, and presented a special jury prize for writing to Nijla Mu» min's «Jinn,»
about a 17 - year - old girl whose mother suddenly converts to Islam.
For two hundred pages, Sanders has been surreptitiously empaneling readers as
jurors for the coming trial,
who by then, can't beg to be excused from bearing witness to the final act in the courtroom: «In a building filled with horrors enacted by one human upon another, this courtroom was
about to go well beyond the norm, beyond what most people are brave enough to imagine, let alone recount.»
Arbitration puts the final decision in the hands of one person,
who likely is more experienced and sophisticated
about the law than six
jurors in a courtroom.
When I listen to Edwards all I hear is a talented lawyer
who grew wealthy preaching to
jurors about pain, suffering and privation.
Juror Dennis DeMartin,
who wrote in a book
about how he drank three vodkas one night during the trial to help him determine whether the defendant was unfit to drive when he crashed his car and killed someone.
- Lawyers are taught to encourage potential
jurors to grandstand
about their beliefs so they can figure out
who are «bad apples» that they will deselect from the jury.
Prosecutors at that trial had complained to the judge
about the FIJA pamphlets and wanted any potential
juror who had received one to be removed from the selection process.
Shut up
about jury nullification during voir dire and deliberations or you could be excluded or removed from the jury, leaving the defendant with no fully informed
juror who will acquit.
Too many newspaper editors have fallen prey to the propaganda campaigns of insurance companies
who try to poison the perception of the public — and potential
jurors in our community —
about the impact of litigation on our society.
The team tracks down jury members to learn that one
juror who blogged
about the trial while on the jury, also «friended» the judge,
who accepted the request, during the trial, a no - no to be sure:
Via Al Nye the Lawyer Guy, I was pointed to an Associated Press article
about a Connecticut court offering counseling to
jurors who had served in a particularly horrifying home invasion trial.
Finding prospective
jurors who can keep an open mind both
about issues at the innocence / guilty phase and at the sentence phases,
jurors who can stand up against community prejudice.
What of restrictions on lawyers
who want to get out - of - court information
about jurors, ideally in time to challenge them at the time of their selection, but also to tailor arguments and maybe even appeal results?
Yes, Josh Hallett, you may blog
about jury duty as long as you don't blog during trial, say blogging attorneys
who responded to my post «May
jurors blog jury duty?»
Among judges
who do not permit attorneys to use social media during the jury selection process, the most common reasons were concerns
about logistics and the privacy of
jurors.
Thus, the plaintiff's lawyer will question the potential
jurors on their feelings
about lawsuits and people
who sue.
Some
jurors find it odd, even insulting, that before the trial begins, attorneys from both sides will question potential
jurors about a wide range of topics to find
jurors who likely will be impartial.
Given the possibility of
jurors who might ignore the law as written, it's not surprising when picking
jurors for a trial, lawyers — whose existence is dependent on an orderly society — will ask
about nullification, usually in the slightly roundabout way:
We recently brought you news that candidate for Sheriff of Greene County, Illinois, Luke Lamb, has been charged with unlawful communication with a
juror for sharing a link to the FIJA website and making comments
about jury nullification on Facebook to someone
who apparently requested the information.
But mock trials also show sympathetic defendants get more non-guilty verdicts and unsympathetic defendants get more guilty verdicts in front of
jurors who were explicitly told
about nullification compared to those
who weren't.
First, it is critical to understand this one fact
about jurors: while they do not particularly like or trust expert witnesses, they do like people
who can help them understand the material in a case.
They will distribute free FIJA materials as well as answer questions for those
who stop by the table to learn
about jurors» rights and responsibilities.
Two months of ongoing criticism of the guilty verdict that sent Dennis Oland to prison — and of the character and motives of jury members
who delivered it — is raising questions
about rules in Canada that gag
jurors after a trial, says Toronto lawyer Allan Rouben.
A web page is worth a thousand words, especially if you're looking for information
about potential
jurors who will decide the fate of your case.
«Jury nullification» is normally practiced by individual
jurors,
who know
about it.
Richard George Kopf,
who blogs
about life as a federal trial judge over at Hercules and the Umpire, did an interesting thought experiment in relation to this case where he wondered if it was appropriate to use a peremptory strike of a
juror if that
juror is ugly and your client doesn't want ugly people on the jury or the case is somehow related to physical beauty.
Most judges find out
about juror misuse of Net media from tattling by other
jurors or lawyers (perhaps lawyers
who feel they are losing the case?).