«There's very little skepticism within these circles about the reality of climate change, nor
about the potential risk climate change poses to national and international security.»
Not exact matches
This research workshop focused on the issue of how future
climate change might affect transportation and brought together top transportation and
climate change experts to explore what is currently known
about the interaction between
climate change and transportation and identify key
potential risks.
A few points that have caught my interest so far: • dealing with complex problems using complex tools, ideas • the idea of reconciliation in scientific debates is to try different approaches in an experimental meeting for attempting nonviolent communication in impassioned debates where there is disagreement • reconciliation is not
about consensus, but rather creating an arena where we can have honest disagreement • violence in this debate derives from the
potential impacts of
climate change and the policy options, and differing political and cultural notions of
risk and responsibility.
In the face of uncertainty
about future policies to address
climate change, companies are using internal carbon pricing in their strategic planning to manage regulatory
risk and explore future scenarios for
potential investments.
The workshop brought together policy makers, practitioners and researchers from the fields of social protection,
climate change adaptation and disaster
risk reduction and had two core objectives: to understand better how social protection can be used to strengthen the poor's resilience to
climate and natural disaster
risk in developing countries; to create a forum for cross-regional learning
about good practice for realizing the
potential synergies between social protection, disaster
risk reduction, and
climate change adaptation.
Other compelling reasons to begin taking action include the
potential for catastrophes that defy the assumption that
climate change damages will be incremental and linear; the
risk of irreversible environmental impacts; the need to learn
about the pace at which society can begin a transition to a
climate - stable economy; the likelihood of imposing unconscionable burdens and impossible tasks on future generations; the need to create incentives to accelerate technological development the address
climate change; and the ready availability of «no regrets» policies that have very low or even no costs to the economy.
Assessments can not be alarmist, but they must henceforth push scientists beyond their comfort zones in framing conclusions that will adequately inform decision - makers
about the full range of
potential risk — particularly those decision - makers who worry
about how to adapt and / or how to mainstream
climate risk into their other decisions.
Some more astute voices have been speculating
about this
potential since the turn of the century — and suggesting that with dynamic
climate shifts there are even greater
risks of extreme hydrological and temperature changes.
«One major concern
about wildfires becoming more frequent in permafrost areas is the
potential to put the vast amounts of carbon stored there at increased
risk of being emitted and further amplify warming,» said Todd Sanford, a
climate scientist at Climate Central and lead author of the group's newly released report on Alaskan wildfires, by
climate scientist at
Climate Central and lead author of the group's newly released report on Alaskan wildfires, by
Climate Central and lead author of the group's newly released report on Alaskan wildfires, by e-mail.
As well as advising partners on the
risks and opportunities associated with
climate change, he has authored Getting to Zero: Defining Corporate Carbon Neutrality, which explores a number of the claims of carbon or
climate neutrality that have been made so far and makes a series of recommendations
about what should lie behind any such declaration, and Making Sense of the Low Carbon Economy, which provides an accessible overview of the drivers behind the low carbon economy and explores the
potential implications for business in the UK.
Whenever a
potential investment project has finances that rely on governments continuing to talk big but do little
about climate change, the project
risks becoming non-viable after all the costs of development are spent if the government subsequently starts to take
climate change seriously.
On and on go the discussions
about the
potential risks of a spill but not enough people are talking
about the much larger
risk of unmitigated
climate change.