In fact, I agree with some of the things Atheists say
about religious folks.
I'm a residual Catholic with agnostic / atheist leanings, but honestly... one of the biggest gripes
about religious folks that agnostics have is that they're obnoxious and preachy.
I thought the same
about you religious folk.
I wonder
about the religious folks who are given an 80 % chance of survival but do not make it.
Not exact matches
Moral of the story: most
religious folks tend pick and choose which parts of the bible to get feisty
about.
Much of classical music is instrumental, operas are not always
about religion, country music isn't always
religious,
folk music depends on the origin which can be secular or of other religions besides Christian, much of rock and pop music is not
religious, and so on.
I have to tell you though, some of
religious folks would be a very bad people if it wasn't for the «fear of god» as they already don't know anything
about logic.
If the righteous «
religious»
folks spend half as much time worry
about their own lives and morals instead of butting into other people's, we'd all be better off.
I do not see any of the
religious folks with much in the way of good things to say
about gay people.
I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other
religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue
about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different
folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...
For all those super
religious and not so
religious folks, it will give you something to talk
about in addition to why a huge statue was struck by lightening.
We talk
about the same things you
religious folks talk
about.
These are the
folks who like to talk
about «common sense» and who, as we know from research is common among the
religious, rely heavily on intuition aand believe all answers are intuitive.
it is pretty hilarious to see all the same
folks who complain
about atheists on all the
religious articles are all here on this atheist article doing exactly what they complain
about.
Additionally, it presupposes that non
religious folks don't also hold a lot of unfounded beliefs — which they do in
about equal measure to the
religious.
Lerone A. Marti, an assistant professor of American
religious history at Eden Theological Seminary in St. Louis, wrote that church
folks who stick by unrepentant pastors have a lot to learn
about forgiveness and accountability.
If you believe all that happened randomly, that the bang was powered by nothingness, then you could teach us
religious folks a few things
about faith.
But do you think that maybe the majority of the body of
religious in general (
religious being the majority of the planet, and
about 85 % of the USA) are decent
folk, and not like these politicians, and that maybe you are offending a lot of good people.
I was prickly
about people's demands on «my time,» especially when they interrupted silence or prayer, and I was bugged by what seemed to be widespread spiritual sloppiness in
folks who considered themselves
religious.
Just goes to show ya,
religious folks are loud and get a lot of press... but almost no one gives a damn
about their hoots!
Dude, If these
religious folk know more
about science why do they deny the parts that invalidate arguments for gods?
did anyone take the quiz... there is a question
about what is the religion of most people in indonesia... the answer is muslim, yet... the picture that goes along with the question and answer is confused... i think i saw an elephant trunk on the idols face... maybe the
folks who put together the quiz and slide show should brush up on thier
religious and cultural studies as well...
One might also say that if the story is
about science, like Stephen Hawking's theories, then
folks shouldn't post
religious comments either, but try stopping them!
Religious folk claim to know things
about the origins of the universe and mankind that these people do not.
The
religious folks in charge want to make this
about Christianity surviving an attack by Islam.
One way that
religious folks avoid uncomfortable conversations
about ambition is they cloak them with
religious language.
I believe the author is talking
about folks who use the «I'm spiritual but not
religious» line to avoid actually examining the questions «Is there a God?»
When the
religious folk that try to shove it down everyone else's throat stop doing it, I'll have a few good things to say
about religion.
Yeah, but
religious folk don't seem to discredit what fat - assed people say
about anything, fatness and diet included.
However, He * was *
about telling
religious folks to back off.
Nothing mystical
about what it causes to happen to the parochial reflex in
religious folks — we see it all over the place.
Just as plenty of
religious folks can be quite rational when it comes to economics and decisions
about their work, for instance, atheists can hold irrational beliefs in other areas such as politics, and social values.
You, and the other ignorant
religious hômophobic bigots can whine
about it all you want — and we fully expect you
folks to do so — but it won't change a thing.
One of the interesting things
about the story is that the rich man is very
religious and knows all
about Abraham and the prophets, but his religion had done very little when it came to the compassion
folks were starving for on the streets.
I was giving this guy the benefit of the doubt until the line
about how
religious folk should come (and apparently waste their time) and run the atheists off.
Folks talk
about the soul as a
religious item — that it synonymous with religion — But religions don't really explain what a soul is — because they don't know — only a possible destination — Before you get all huffy, please consider where my concept comes from — I am no longer
religious — I studied Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs for dozens of years, and determined a different design, for what the glyphs could portend — and found some interesting thought processes hidden within — including what the soul is — for instance: The Ankh symbol represents Life — the charcters for An and kh, I translate as an = thought and kh = soul — Thus Life = the thought of the soul — The soul as described by the AE, is a continuity between 2 or more enti - ties — including the enti - ty Environment — Our environment creates us — some name their environment as god — some believe there is a continuity with their environment — that is soul --
Folks like to talk
about how America has been blessed (with riches) because of its
religious origins (which included slavery and ethnic cleansing).
Now that I'm thinking
about it, there really are a lot of parallels between you and fanatical
religious folk.
You used to believe the «
religious right» would oppose
folks like Karl that had illegitimate children, or would have reservations
about a Pres who had three wives.
I think
folks hang on to their beliefs
about how they should eat almost as hard as they hang on to their
religious beliefs.
Deadpool 2 is the sort of movie where the heroes kill a guy — after spending the last act of the film saving that guy so one of the characters will learn a moral lesson — all in the hopes of scoring a quick laugh derived from the joys of knocking off
religious zealots, while also using time travel during the mid-credits scene to erase a death that took place earlier in the film so as to avoid outraged howls from Internet
folks about the wickedness of «fridging» tertiary female characters.
So in one day you can spend an hour on a beachfront massage table to the sound of waves rolling in, then head off to watch ancient
religious /
folk stories
about playful gods acted out in a nearby temple (there are no fewer than 20,000 temples on the island).
Part of the reason that elements of the climate change debate take on
religious proportions — by the activists for and against policy — is that
folks have so dug in around almost every aspect of the debate that it is hard to raise a question
about some uncritically accepted element of the
religious canon without
folks first attacking you as an untrained heathen.