Sentences with phrase «about the religious folks»

In fact, I agree with some of the things Atheists say about religious folks.
I'm a residual Catholic with agnostic / atheist leanings, but honestly... one of the biggest gripes about religious folks that agnostics have is that they're obnoxious and preachy.
I thought the same about you religious folk.
I wonder about the religious folks who are given an 80 % chance of survival but do not make it.

Not exact matches

Moral of the story: most religious folks tend pick and choose which parts of the bible to get feisty about.
Much of classical music is instrumental, operas are not always about religion, country music isn't always religious, folk music depends on the origin which can be secular or of other religions besides Christian, much of rock and pop music is not religious, and so on.
I have to tell you though, some of religious folks would be a very bad people if it wasn't for the «fear of god» as they already don't know anything about logic.
If the righteous «religious» folks spend half as much time worry about their own lives and morals instead of butting into other people's, we'd all be better off.
I do not see any of the religious folks with much in the way of good things to say about gay people.
I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...
For all those super religious and not so religious folks, it will give you something to talk about in addition to why a huge statue was struck by lightening.
We talk about the same things you religious folks talk about.
These are the folks who like to talk about «common sense» and who, as we know from research is common among the religious, rely heavily on intuition aand believe all answers are intuitive.
it is pretty hilarious to see all the same folks who complain about atheists on all the religious articles are all here on this atheist article doing exactly what they complain about.
Additionally, it presupposes that non religious folks don't also hold a lot of unfounded beliefs — which they do in about equal measure to the religious.
Lerone A. Marti, an assistant professor of American religious history at Eden Theological Seminary in St. Louis, wrote that church folks who stick by unrepentant pastors have a lot to learn about forgiveness and accountability.
If you believe all that happened randomly, that the bang was powered by nothingness, then you could teach us religious folks a few things about faith.
But do you think that maybe the majority of the body of religious in general (religious being the majority of the planet, and about 85 % of the USA) are decent folk, and not like these politicians, and that maybe you are offending a lot of good people.
I was prickly about people's demands on «my time,» especially when they interrupted silence or prayer, and I was bugged by what seemed to be widespread spiritual sloppiness in folks who considered themselves religious.
Just goes to show ya, religious folks are loud and get a lot of press... but almost no one gives a damn about their hoots!
Dude, If these religious folk know more about science why do they deny the parts that invalidate arguments for gods?
did anyone take the quiz... there is a question about what is the religion of most people in indonesia... the answer is muslim, yet... the picture that goes along with the question and answer is confused... i think i saw an elephant trunk on the idols face... maybe the folks who put together the quiz and slide show should brush up on thier religious and cultural studies as well...
One might also say that if the story is about science, like Stephen Hawking's theories, then folks shouldn't post religious comments either, but try stopping them!
Religious folk claim to know things about the origins of the universe and mankind that these people do not.
The religious folks in charge want to make this about Christianity surviving an attack by Islam.
One way that religious folks avoid uncomfortable conversations about ambition is they cloak them with religious language.
I believe the author is talking about folks who use the «I'm spiritual but not religious» line to avoid actually examining the questions «Is there a God?»
When the religious folk that try to shove it down everyone else's throat stop doing it, I'll have a few good things to say about religion.
Yeah, but religious folk don't seem to discredit what fat - assed people say about anything, fatness and diet included.
However, He * was * about telling religious folks to back off.
Nothing mystical about what it causes to happen to the parochial reflex in religious folks — we see it all over the place.
Just as plenty of religious folks can be quite rational when it comes to economics and decisions about their work, for instance, atheists can hold irrational beliefs in other areas such as politics, and social values.
You, and the other ignorant religious hômophobic bigots can whine about it all you want — and we fully expect you folks to do so — but it won't change a thing.
One of the interesting things about the story is that the rich man is very religious and knows all about Abraham and the prophets, but his religion had done very little when it came to the compassion folks were starving for on the streets.
I was giving this guy the benefit of the doubt until the line about how religious folk should come (and apparently waste their time) and run the atheists off.
Folks talk about the soul as a religious item — that it synonymous with religion — But religions don't really explain what a soul is — because they don't know — only a possible destination — Before you get all huffy, please consider where my concept comes from — I am no longer religious — I studied Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs for dozens of years, and determined a different design, for what the glyphs could portend — and found some interesting thought processes hidden within — including what the soul is — for instance: The Ankh symbol represents Life — the charcters for An and kh, I translate as an = thought and kh = soul — Thus Life = the thought of the soul — The soul as described by the AE, is a continuity between 2 or more enti - ties — including the enti - ty Environment — Our environment creates us — some name their environment as god — some believe there is a continuity with their environment — that is soul --
Folks like to talk about how America has been blessed (with riches) because of its religious origins (which included slavery and ethnic cleansing).
Now that I'm thinking about it, there really are a lot of parallels between you and fanatical religious folk.
You used to believe the «religious right» would oppose folks like Karl that had illegitimate children, or would have reservations about a Pres who had three wives.
I think folks hang on to their beliefs about how they should eat almost as hard as they hang on to their religious beliefs.
Deadpool 2 is the sort of movie where the heroes kill a guy — after spending the last act of the film saving that guy so one of the characters will learn a moral lesson — all in the hopes of scoring a quick laugh derived from the joys of knocking off religious zealots, while also using time travel during the mid-credits scene to erase a death that took place earlier in the film so as to avoid outraged howls from Internet folks about the wickedness of «fridging» tertiary female characters.
So in one day you can spend an hour on a beachfront massage table to the sound of waves rolling in, then head off to watch ancient religious / folk stories about playful gods acted out in a nearby temple (there are no fewer than 20,000 temples on the island).
Part of the reason that elements of the climate change debate take on religious proportions — by the activists for and against policy — is that folks have so dug in around almost every aspect of the debate that it is hard to raise a question about some uncritically accepted element of the religious canon without folks first attacking you as an untrained heathen.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z