The president did the right thing, but your side is running around screaming
about religious rights being taken away, and THEY ARE NOT!!!!!!!!
Companies like Hobby Lobby and the Catholic - run hospitals and such that are screaming
about their religious rights are forgetting the fact that providing employment to people doesn't equate to some moral mandate to play God and give or deny those employees their right to a legal drug or procedure.
How come he isn't holding meetings
about the religious right wing extremists who are causing all the trouble in this country.
That is what we know
about the religious right: they despise God, love money and worship Satan!
I am sick and tired of everyones religious rights, what
about the religious rights of christians?
The document from the Equality and Human Rights Commission follows the European Court of Human Rights judgment in four cases
about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.
They spread hate and fear every chance they get and lest we forget, these Christian conservatives whining about their «religious freedoms» now, are the SAME people who didn't give a rat's -
about the religious rights of Muslims who wanted to build a community center in NY.
This is an article
about religious rights, and has no political content.
A Supreme Court ruling this week dealing with the seemingly innocuous question of whether it was OK for the state of Missouri to deny a grant to a church to improve its playground, has raised major questions
about religious rights, separation of church and state, and, last but not least, school vouchers.
Not exact matches
At least 24 of the 34 colleges and universities granted
religious exemptions based on their beliefs
about gender identity also received waivers allowing them to discriminate against gay and lesbian students and employees, citing faith - based prohibitions against homosexual sex, the Human
Rights Campaign said.
But this cultural segment is not
about conservatives or the
religious right.
«We have
religious concerns
about the fate of the holy mosque in Jerusalem and
about the
rights of the Palestinian people.
It's always very funny to see the
religious zealots scream
about what they «know» their god wants, but when it's an uncomfortable contradiction then «oh god can't be understood» or «who are you to question god» (might makes
right?).
That's why many atheists and agnostics are fired up
about stopping some of the lunatic actions and behaviors by the socially conservative /
religious right.
These
religious right extremeists who get all up in arms
about scientists are hypocrits and don't follow their own teaching.
It is
about religion... and your
right, as soon as
religious people stop persecuting those that don't believe the world will be a better place.
*********************************** One would hope that voters were casting their ballots on the basis of what they conclude is best for a civil society and a pluralistic population, not on the more egocentric opinions they may have
about right or wrong that are derived from their
religious beliefs.
Right wing
religious extremists don't care
about the scientific process all they want to do is promote the dogma.
Ultimately, much of this is a result of the modern «competitive» paradigm of
religious communities: being
right, having the truth, drawing people into the light from the dark, etc. all becomes
about feeling good
about ones own membership and being part of those who are «
right».
About half of the Americans who identify as part of the Tea Party movement say they are also part of the
religious right or conservative Christian movement, according to a survey released last year by the Public Religion Research Institute.
The
religious right isn't
about whether or not YOU believe as they do, although they would prefer you did.
So I guess what I'm trying to say is this: there is a
right way for
religious people to help those around them come to know and follow God, should they so desire, but yelling at them
about fire and brimstone is not really acceptable or in good taste.
• Commentators who fear and loathe evangelical Protestants, and there are not a few who fit that description, oscillate between, on the one hand, warning us
about the theocracy that the «
religious right» is determined to impose and, on the other, reporting that the evangelical enemy is a spent force.
In citing the fact that many
religious scientists believe in evolution, I was not saying «gee, they must all be
right» because «all those good people seem to agree
about....
Your
right there was a time that we did not know
about germs and the
religious claimed it was demons and evil spirits that made people sick.
It is
about the
right of the government of the United States to make ANY law which impacts an individual's (and a corporation is an dividual under the law)
religious beliefs.
Your
religious war figure would be
about right for a mean of straight up religion driven wars and genocides... source: Wikipedia.org war and genocides combined.
And finally, if any
religious group in America had a
right to complain
about being marginalized in this election cycle, it would be Muslims.
But there is a reason to remain vigilant
about religious liberty, including something as simple as speaking out
about the denial of such a
right.
And just what kind of buffoon do you think would believe in something with can not be proven??? Oh
right,
religious people, sorry I forgot
about them.
But because of the path influential people have taken over the last thrity years or so, what young people think of the
Religious Right is what they think
about evangelicals and even Christians in general.»
«From a vantage point further in the future, I think that ah honest diagnosis will tell the truth
about the pivotal role the
Religious Right has played in these depressing statistics.
It evolved from constitutional traditions respecting private property and individual
rights, it arose from
religious teachings
about human dignity, and it sprang from the mind of Kant.
In an increasingly diverse and rapidly changing culture, some people are anxious
about shifting cultural norms, civil
rights, and
religious liberty.
In addition to worrying
about their own flocks, they also fear that the West, smitten with the BJP's growth - oriented economic agenda and preoccupied by the threat of Islamic extremism, ignores the constriction of
religious freedom and human
rights in India today.
Those in the mainstream media who ignore these trends, or who simply place conservatives like Huckabee and Santorum in the traditional
Religious Right frame, are missing a big story
about the Republican Party, the evangelical movement in America, and my generation's response to both.
For Hart, the ancients in every
religious tradition got philosophy so
right that there is little left to be said
about the intellectual foundation of theism.
The
Religious Right will remain, for the same reason the religious commenters here continue their absurd blither «about lakes of fire» and «prayer works» — when you are stupid, there is nothing that can
Religious Right will remain, for the same reason the
religious commenters here continue their absurd blither «about lakes of fire» and «prayer works» — when you are stupid, there is nothing that can
religious commenters here continue their absurd blither «
about lakes of fire» and «prayer works» — when you are stupid, there is nothing that can be done.
’42 Indeed, women from all three continents, Africa, Asia and Latin America, say that «In the person and praxis of Jesus Christ, women of the three continents find the grounds of our liberation from all discrimination: sexual, racial, social, economic, political and
religious... Christology is integrally linked with action on behalf of social justice and the defense of each person's
right to life and to a more humane life.43 This means that Christology is
about apartheid, sexual exploitation, poverty and oppression.
I think that all theology outside of the
religious right has a PR problem in the U.S. Glenn Beck's comments
about liberation theology — in conjunction with the clips from Jeremiah Wright's sermons — brought liberation theology to the attention of mainstream media.
The growing consensus
about human
rights among
religious leaders is a new development that has yet to be widely recognized and understood.
To bad they have all that
religious propoganda on there walls... Trust me religion is for sheep... Every definition of god was given by man... If you actually think
about it... They all can't be
right!
DO N'T think you understand democracy if you think it's only
about elections: it's
about injecting as much of your
religious culture and mindset which excludes freedom of thought, freedom of expression, political and
religious pluralism, and human
rights.
Finally, the fact that religion - at least in the West - learned something
about human
rights from democratic experience does not mean that «human
rights is not a
religious idea,» as Schlesinger dogmatically asserts.
, I was concerned
about the rise of the
religious right, the moral majority — not because of the politics, but because a lot of people think that's the way to make America a Christian country again, whatever that means.
«it was only when
religious belief was removed from the realm of «fact» to that of «value»,
about which individuals were free to differ, that a societal system could evolve in which a multiplicity of denominations could exist side by side and have equal
rights.»
One prominent Presbyterian church in Chicago offers a theologically grounded discourse that critiques the
Religious Right's «family values» by talking
about Jesus Christ's ministry of inclusion.
A few acknowledge that the contest is most importantly
about religion, but then go on to trivialize that reality by saying we are at war with all forms of «fundamentalism,» including the «
religious right» in this country.
There is a great deal of justified worry
about how the advance of gay
rights will harm
religious liberty.
I wonder then why Mr. Nye is wasting so much oxygen complaining
about the great «harm» the teaching of Creationism does to children... though I may not personally agree with the tenets of Creationism, I do believe in the
right of parents to pass their personal
religious beliefs on to their children - whether those beliefs are Christian, Hindu, Muslim, etc....