Sentences with phrase «about the responsibilities from»

Ashton Kutcher takes on the role of an aspiring member of the Coast Guard where he learns about responsibility from The Guardian.

-- Explody Bomb and Hold Your Fire: A Game About Responsibility from Alkterios Games are on sale until 8:59 a.m. PT on May 19.

This allows you to learn firsthand about the responsibilities from someone who performs them.

I learned a lot about responsibility from working here with the children and making daily plans for the children to enjoy and learn.

Not exact matches

Employers should be clear about the roles and responsibilities that each position requires, from the beginning.

That shift — from employer to consumer responsibility — is exactly what's about to happen to insurance.

He said that perhaps one should really think about who is acting irresponsibly: Those who try to tackle foreseeable problems and find long - term solutions or those who bow away from their responsibility and dialogue.

Studies show that school gardens have multiple benefits, from teaching students about plant science and agriculture, to instilling a sense of responsibility.

On Tuesday evening, I heard first hand from a group of marketing students about the value they place on corporate responsibility when deciding where to work.

From a German point of view, it's about the UK paying its commitments and the responsibilities it has already made to contribute to the EU budget.

He launched that challenge right from his first interaction with the class at the program orientation dinner, as he addressed a subject he is particularly passionate about: social responsibility.

When you have stories about wealth, money, personal responsibility, or success, and you need fresh insights from an expert — Randy Gage is your man.

They noted that the DEA had provided conflicting guidance to Mallinckrodt about its responsibilities to report suspicious orders from retailers such as Schultz.

15:03 Shel's insights about marketing, consumers, and employees who demand authenticity and social responsibility from businesses link to what we learned about Millennials during our Millennials in the Workplace series.

When defining the responsibilities within your startup, think about the work that needs to be done and how best to organize that work, to get the most value from your investment in people.

While the hearings were ostensibly primarily about data security and privacy, Zuckerberg's own words indicate he was not necessarily limiting them to the privacy issue, and lawmakers» questions covered everything from content censorship to Facebook's responsibility for illegal pharmaceutical ads.

Think of how much could be achieved if we stopped arguing about, killing over, and hiding from responsibility in so many imaginary friends.

You believers can wail all you like about being persecuted, but any thinking person knows that you are merely trying to deflect attention and responsibility away from your sick cult.

Speaking on Premier's News Hour, he said: «We have a responsibility to talk about it because everybody else is, and if our young people can't find out what's right and wrong and what's healthy and what's good from us, then they'll just go somewhere else.

Based entirely on anecdotal evidence, however, I believe the press» credibility with senior citizens has taken a hit from which it is unlikely to recover, and it may be entirely due to the election of 2008, when the mainstream media utterly abandoned whatever responsibilities to the public trust to which it still felt obliged, tossed presumptive - nominee Hillary Clinton aside and» rejecting any - and - all discomfiting questions about his experience, background, past - operations, education, friendships or capabilities» hoisted candidate Barack Obama upon their shoulders and carried him into the White House in triumph.

Well he can expect to be compleatly immune from any questions about church child molestation, he will fade into the background free of responsibility and prosecution from such matters... well done catholics, i am sure jesus would be very proud

His statements about priest and king being bound to the land and the people ultimately point back toward a view that sees social and moral responsibility for the common welfare as stemming from a prior relational view of human persons.

The Neoscholastics usefully elaborated on this responsibility, including within it the sovereign's responsibility to weigh the cause and his responsibility to get advice from knowledgeable persons; yet ultimately, responsibility for the decision about whether to use force rests with the sovereign alone.

But to expect that the global ethic can tell us something important about our responsibilities to far - off future generations when deep disagreements keep it from being specific on our responsibilities to prenatal life strikes me as moral leapfrog.

The question is where the ultimate questions about the significance of life and one «s moral responsibility are going to be asked, and from what source will come the proposed answers.

Thus, well - being could be said to derive simply from the sum of responsibilities performed in everyday life, quite apart from broader questions about the purpose of one's life.

The recent change in the cultural climate, one that everyone from fundamentalists to People for the American Way helped produce and to which each responded, has occasioned fresh talk about civic responsibility.

The argument from suffering reaches beyond medicine's responsibility and competence; it extends into metaphysical questions about the nature of human happiness and what constitutes a meaningful life.

«The Logic of the Cross» reflects on 1 Corinthians 1:18 and furnishes a strong statement about the transition from a life of defensive suspicion to an ethic of confidence, reconciliation and responsibility.

It does not follow, however, from Jesus» virtual silence about any human responsibility for the restraint of evil, that he believed this result would be attained as a kind of by - product of the growth of good.

But God ordered his world in such a way that his own work within that world takes place not least through one of his creatures in particular, namely, the human beings who reflect his image... He has enlisted us to act as his stewards in the project of creation... So the objection about us trying to build God's kingdom by our own efforts, though it seems humble and pious, can actually be a way of hiding from responsibility, of keeping one's head well down when the boss is looking for volunteers...» (207).

The transition from tenseness, self - responsibility, and worry, to equanimity, receptivity, and peace, is the most wonderful of all those shiftings of inner equilibrium, those changes of the personal centre of energy, which I have analyzed so often; and the chief wonder of it is that it so often comes about, not by doing, but by simply relaxing and throwing the burden down.

You would think the originators of this lie would eventually recognize their culpability, and feel the responsibility to do something about it, say take education seriously and set up programs that will slowly extricate everyone's claws from everyone else's throats.

Against the institution's detractors» from Marx to radical feminists to Michel Foucault's theories about oppressive «disciplining» mechanisms» the family provides the modern world with a zone of freedom joined to responsibility in a way that no other institution does or could.

If we speak about Christian political responsibility we say that our ethics is a political ethics of responsibility and that we derive our norms and principles from the Gospel.

And although my husband and I talked for years about sharing parenting responsibilities, he took only a few days off from work after each of our children was born.

Concern about potential peril resulting from involvement of the courts in religion did not prevent every state in this country from rejecting the claimed denial of responsibility for injuries inflicted in hospitals operated by religious organizations.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

But no man or woman can be so easy - going about his own life, his own moral responsibility, his own opportunity to serve God and the brethren, that he can forget the awful possibility that he may, by willful choice, elect alienation from God rather than fulfillment in God.

About that event the editorial line was that we must distinguish the message from the messenger, and it is true that the mostly middle - class black men who gathered in Washington seemed to be affirming, in a most welcome way, fairly traditional truths about personal and family responsibiAbout that event the editorial line was that we must distinguish the message from the messenger, and it is true that the mostly middle - class black men who gathered in Washington seemed to be affirming, in a most welcome way, fairly traditional truths about personal and family responsibiabout personal and family responsibility.

Paul heard from God pretty clearly, but he still talked a lot about the responsibility of leaders to correct.

These restaurants are embracing the ideas of transparency and responsibility, recognizing that people care more and more about not just how their food tastes, but where it comes from and how it's sourced.

If Durkan is serious about Coles» «responsibility in Victoria to make sure the farming community is healthy», he wouldn't be peddling a $ 200,000 stunt, he'd be offering to renegotiate the $ 2 billion contract that is strangling the sector (which is perhaps exactly the conclusion the stunt was designed to distract us from).

Equally vital is the message we give them about where our food comes from, concepts of animal welfare, sustainability, healthy eating and environmental responsibility — and where better to learn this than at school?

A day to kick back in bed all morning, drink freshly pressed dark roast French coffee, read the paper (love the fact that it is on - line now) and not feel guilty about switching off from all the daily responsibilities.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

But Ozil was merely talking about what he sees as the team's own responsibility for getting themselves into this mess and he did say that the Gunners could still get themselves out of it with a little help from our two main rivals Tottenham and Leicester.

The thing i like the most about ox is that he does nt shy from taking responsibility even if does lose the odd ball in dangerous places.

«The team gains confidence from each other; it is about collective responsibility not just one player, and if we are going to succeed it will be about every player not just one.»

I have absolutely no doubt about the pair's ability to take on the responsibility of driving our attack from the midfield and am really looking forward to watching them play.