Sentences with phrase «about the single player in»

He said: «I worry about every single player in my squad and I want every single player to be happy but at the end of the day only 11 players can start the game.

Admittedly, most will only care about the single player in Andromeda, but those who enjoyed Mass Effect 3's multiplayer and want to see how Andromeda expands on those concepts will be sorely disappointed.

Not exact matches

90 Millions for a single player, we are not Real Madrid... And we are talking about Premier League where prominent players also fade but we know about Dzeko and that's why I would go with Dzeko because he has history of playing well in Premier League and affordability....

I never put the getting results part into question.But the fact that he's our player and I ike him doesn't mean I'll lie about him.I wouldn't also say he's been better in every single season but just that he's adapted more quickly.As for you picking talent over hardwork that's your opininon.After all it's not like Hazard is lazy though Sanchez works harder than him.

We had RvP in what should have been his prime with other handy players, as well as those players that many are still whining about like Fabregas, Nasri, Song — and we won nothing and waited patiently for 8 seasons for him to finally put in that single season performance — an untypical season that now seems to be how many remember his career at Arsenal.

Wenger has already came out and spoken about age ranges, one of the things he said is that we shouldn't be looking to get 2 mature players for a single spot but rather a mature «in his prime now» would be backed up with a developing player.

He added: «What I would say about Shaw is that the talent and ability are there, but his job as a footballer is to be prepared to perform every day and do every single thing in his life well to be a United player.

It's funny how he said we are better than Liverpool overrall forgetting that in terms of players we were still better than them last season yet the beat us home and away.Liverpool team is not so good yet out of all the top four team they're the ones who play their hearts out.That's why Liverpool didn't lose a single game to a top four team last season though on paper they should have.As for Tottenham if you look at their team they just need a few more signings and consistency so I don't know what's the big deal about them.The painful this is they could've won the league if not for draws.It was a disgrace for any of those two to finish over us last season because on paper it shouldn't be so.This should tell you that it's not all about the team you have.Some it's about luck, sometimes it's about giving your best and sometimes it's just meant to be.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Arsene Wenger keeps banging on about how Arsenal have 25 players in the squad and every single one is important to our attempt to win the Premier League, but when he actually NEEDS to rotate he simply doesn't do it!

Singled out players he don't particularly fancy (ok, we all do that), speculate in idle fantasy about bringing in this player and that player in line with the formation.

Defeat today again might be a very good thing to happen even in Europa cup wenger needs to go if we really serious about being a bigger club again — and reality starting to catch up with him he has been hiding behind philosophy for so long now is out of excuses we brought in football people (Sanlehi, Sven and now we need a new manager who will be working with those guys and share ideas not a single person who kept mediocrity players for years and pay them for nothing and bring in one or two players and send them out on loan

Arsene Wenger and just about every single Arsenal player has come out and forecast that the Gunners are definitely improving enough to be real challengers for all the major trophies next season, and there is absolutely NO doubt that we will quickly become one of the favourites if Wenger brings in more quality players this summer.

(1) this squad has way too many moving parts and very few of our players are good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the chemistry is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6 real starters on this current squad and that's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which is discouraging because Cazorla is injured and might never play again, Sanchez is wanting out and the club is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil is relatively disinterested out there, Kos is getting up there and Sead is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should be the standard... imagine this team moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes

Arsene Wenger does like a bargain, as every Arsenal fan knows all too well, and getting a quality player without having to pay a single penny, or Eurp as the case may be, in transfer fees is certainly a bargain, so I reckon that the Arsenal boss will be having a good long think about the news, reported by the Spanish Catalan sports paper Sport that FC Barcelona are willing to let their Turkish international Arda Turan go for nothing.

No player is bigger than the club and Arsenal fc is in a far bigger worrying state to be worried about one single player??

What a load of codswallop about sanchez great footballer, he's got energy I admit but no single player makes a team, good example Chile, he should have been sold in my opinion and I think wenger made a bad judgement we played and won games without ozil and sanchez already so I don't see the problem and for what I'm hearing the rest of the squad prefer it so especially without sanchez

Mate don't arbitrarily fill in the gaps to help bolster your world view — I am not bitter about how much anyone earns — you won't find a single derogatory comment from me in the history of this forum against any player that has left for money.

Yet we don't yap about him 4 days in a row like you do, most likely what you've done that with every single under performing player playing for us in the past.

What I would say about Shaw is that the talent and ability are there, but his job as a footballer is to be prepared to perform every day and do every single thing in his life well to be a United player.

This is hugely impressive for a player who was making his debut in a team that is filled with superstar performers in just about every single position in the field.

Perhaps it need not be a single player that makes up for Suarez, but a few: Daniel Sturridge can directly replace the goals that Suarez provided, and also has his individual flair about him, but that magical quality that Suarez had, whilst unique to him, is remarkably alike to a young Brazilian no. 10 with more than a touch of flair playing for Liverpool, a player very similar to Suarez in some ways — his quiet nature off the field, and dazzling on the ball skills when on the pitch — yet also different, a creative player rather than a destroyer of opposition teams.

Deeply agree with you guys, where is Arsenal team we used to watch???? Where in the world is it???? Really really desapointed.I think this is the worse Arsenal team Ive ever seen.i know these guys are talented but may be AW worship them so much as stars so that they spend their time with Chicks and do nt have the force to fight on the pitch anymore.No encouragement from the coach, nor the assistant.Arsenal only thinks about making money, forcing the fans to support these young players, focusing on the idea of producing stars and sell them afterward but not buying stars to win games.I was really pssd off when I watch the Liverpool game agst hull city, Both teams were so alive and all strong during the game, fast play, pass accuracy, dynamism, combativity, never give up minded on evry single minute they fought for the ball.ManU had a draw today but You could see that they were fighting till the end.I do nt know WHAT DID WE DO TO WIN AGST MANU AND CHELSKI?????.

The French attacker from Juventus, Paul Pogba has been receiving for the past few years a number of individual awards and recognition due to his standout performances and this has not gone under the radar as just about every single top European club is interested in signing the 22 year old player.

installed inside or on the outside of a player's helmet, embedded in a mouth guard, helmet chin strap, skull cap, head band, or skin patch worn behind the ear, for instance), all are essentially designed to do the same thing: alert coaches, athletic trainers, team doctors, other sideline personnel and / or parents about high - risk single and multiple head impacts in order to improve the rate at which concussions are identified.

«I really do think [the new study is] about the best single piece of evidence that aerosol is an important player in electrification,» says Earle Williams, a physical meteorologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was not involved in the research.

Quake 4 is everything that fans loved about Quake 2 and 3 in one package, providing an engaging single - player story and chaotic high - flying multiplayer.

The difficulty is a bit high in single player and requires very sharp reflexes to do well, but play it for a while and you'll understand what it's all about.

The single player was finished in about 6 hours, so its very short.

The single - player campaign is shorter than other games of its kind — I stomped through it in about 8 hours.

However, it doesn't mean exploration itself is fun, especially if we are talking about playing the game in single player mode.

All in all, the single - player campaign is a truly thrilling and fun experience that will be enjoyed by all Transformers fans and even those who have limited knowledge about the franchise.

Star Wars: Battlefront 2 «s single - player campaign revolves around a heroic figure in the evil Galactic Empire, prompting us to ask Motive's Mark Thompon and LucasFilm's Steve Blank just how we should feel about her.

Suzy, who alternates between immersion in young adult novels about magical orphans and violent outbursts against her parents and her schoolmates, carries the modern world (the movie is set in 1965) with her in the form of a portable record player and a single Françoise Hardy recording.

I know there was a lot of concern initially about putting multiplayer into the Mass Effect experience but it actually works really well and it ties in to the single player experience.

In response, fans have cobbled together theories about what «must» have happened to GTA V's single - player updates.

In particular, E3 is often reserved for things like the reveal of Zombies mode, and Activision will likely have a lot to say about the rumored decision to drop the single - player campaign from the game entirely in favor of a battle royale modIn particular, E3 is often reserved for things like the reveal of Zombies mode, and Activision will likely have a lot to say about the rumored decision to drop the single - player campaign from the game entirely in favor of a battle royale modin favor of a battle royale mode.

Anyway, the length of time in the single - player mode is impressive, as it will take about an hour or so for each entire level, including the main boss, to be completed.

I was looking forward to Dying Light before but I must admit I was concerned about whether I'd enjoy it in single - player since Dead Island really did skew towards co-op and lost my interest in its sequel.

«The reason that we went single - player...» Hoshino said, «well, originally, we were thinking about having a multiplayer option, but because we're going with a pay - to - win model, we were worried that by having online multiplayer, for all the new users that would be coming in experiencing the game for the first time, they might be immediately deterred by fighting against opponents who had superior equipment and gear — and we didn't want to have that kind of negative impact on new player.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are talking about microtransations in a single player campaign, right?

Players first learned about the Xbox Live Arcade port in April 2009 via a single leaked screenshot of a developer's dashboard which showed the icon of Joanna Dark behind the developer's avatar.

While today we learned a great deal about what was in Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, we also confirmed one thing that was not in the game, a single player campaign mode.

I saw rumors all over the Internet about Mario kart U being the next double dash, where the second player (in the back or even if Your playing single player mode) uses the game pad to properly aim at enemies instead of just dropping them and yes it should have the option id using 2 gamepads when there are 2 or more players.

Although the core experience in both modes is about getting into a huge mobile weapons platform, joining a squad and waging war in a fictional Eurasian territory called Neroimus, the single player campaign isn't really a traditional adventure.

How about 4 swords, connectivity between the wii u gamepad and 3DS or add a single player adventure like in the anniversary edition.

State commissions are investigating whether to outright ban lootboxes in some countries, Battlefront 2 is one of the worst rated AAA titles this year and players are ridiculing EA en - masse under every single social media post about the game.

Talking about Single Player you can still pause the game but in a harder way.

im still getting it just to play story mode and $ hit but im not that concern about multiplayer it does nt need to be in every game just saying single player is good enough on certain games

In a break from tradition, the Call of Duty franchise is focusing on multiplayer modes, and while I should feel angry (as someone who primarily enjoys single - player experiences), I'm surprisingly optimistic about the upcoming installment of the popular franchise.