Sentences with phrase «about their evolution as»

The evolutionists talk about evolution as though evolution brings things into being, which it does not.

I also feel that, even though I am confident about evolution as it stands now, I have great confidence that even more revealing theories will arise that better explain our origins that are not out in the universe, but within us and our natural surrounding, but in a natural and non-spiritual way.

Evangelicals are wrong about evolution as an example.

I don't think anyone is saying not to teach them about creationism, but teach them about evolution as fact so they understand how we actually came to be.

This represents a profound lack of knowledge about evolution as well as a profound lack of knowledge about childbirth.

Olivier Theyskens tells us about his evolution as a designer and recent collaboration with Theory.

They sat down again this week to talk about their evolution as a publishing solution.

Please tell us something about your evolution as a painter and what has lead you to become the painter you are today.

A lot of the scientists you mention did not have the benefit of knowledge about evolution as they lived before it was discovered.

Not exact matches

Public attention is about to be grabbed by the rapid evolution of the auto dashboard, as carmakers and tech giants work out bringing to the car the Internet experience consumers have gotten used to on their smartphones.

«Our evolution as a company is ongoing and is in no way easy, but we are realistic about what is required to move our transformation forward in a timely manner.

The genius of first - time screenwriter Liz Hannah's script is that she makes the story about Graham's evolution as much as it is about the Pentagon Papers.

But it does say something about the evolution of real estate marketing as a discipline distinct from development and sales during the city's decade - long housing boom, and its symbiotic relationship with the media.

«Our evolution as a company is ongoing and is in no way easy, but we are realistic about what is required.»

Among the topics on the agenda: the evolution of shareholder activism and research findings about activist funds» returns, the amended Shareholder Rights Directive (EU) 2017/828, litigation and its effectiveness as tool for activist investors, and what can an issuer do to adequately address activists» new challenges.

Mr. Munger talks about Mr. Buffett's evolution as an investor.

As we continue to experience the evolution of the social age, one thing we can be sure about is the march of progression will pick up its» steady beat.

evolution has nothing to say about the «big bang» it would be just as strange to say that «god» or some intelligence made the world and the universe, as you have to come to the obvious questions again..

In the meanwhile, that is so far off that it's only ever going to convince people who believe the same as you do and are as ignorant about evolution and nature and fossils as you are.

Making a judgement about a faith, be it Christianity or Islam, on the basis of a few extremists has about the same logical errancy as saying evolution is false because Hitler's murderous race purification rampage was fueled by his study of Darwin's theory, a truth written by Hitler himself.

I see the problem this way: you are trying to appear superior to anyone who doesn't view evolution as you do while I am trying to learn more about your position through dialogue.

God controls all of life and all of evolution, he isn't worried about time as he is eternal and time isn't an issuefor him.

I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the religious community.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

I also appreciate your recommendations about what and how to read as I explore the evolution / creation debate further.

I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

It only serves as further evidence that creationists get their ideas about evolution from creationist sources, sources that are misinformed or dishonest.

Please do your research on the subject matter, as there is much more to learn about human evolution.

Man - made hypothesis of where we came from, such as from evolution (saying that proteins formed in a «prebiotic soup» and then «joining hands» with DNA, so that eventually a living cell is born), is not satisfying nor does it provide logical answers as to how the quality of love came about nor a conscience, that literally means «co-knowledge» in Greek.

Yes, I'm talking about macro evolution, as in one day monkey years down the road... we have a human... There is adaptation for sure but then there is a big drop off from that and new species evolving from single cells...

But he may not then turn around and demand that the rest of us, unrestricted by his methodological self - limitation, ignore obvious truths about reality, such as the clearly teleological nature of evolution.

Holloway considerably enhances and develops the patristic perspective about the flesh as the «hinge of salvation» with his vision of the evolution of matter poised and framed from its beginning as a unity which culminates in the Incarnation of God.

In planning creation this way, in God's one Thought about creation, Mary stands as the peak of evolution, the highpoint of the Universe, the first of all creatures under Christ.

But as we celebrate that win, we reinforce the idea that our spiritual evolution is about cutting out negative behaviors.

for one thing variation or adaption is not the same as evolution as has been proven in what we know about microbiology today.

The work he was describing in the seminar was, as the Institute's on - line notice said, an attempt to «cut through both sides of the increasingly polarised debate about how the universe was created, with atheistic Darwinians declaring the death of God, whilst anti-Darwinian creationists denounce evolution as fraud.»

TheCapitalist As I stated a few pages back, creationists lie all the time about evolution, and I don't think they could have been so thorough with their misrepresentation of evolution unless they had the correct understanding of the theory from which to work with.

From him, as from Father, I heard nothing, so far as I recall, about a conflict between biblical creation and Darwinian evolution.

The change that has come about in theologies that partake of creative and emergent evolution can be described in this way: since mechanism is no longer the base of their evolutionary thinking, idealism is no longer essential as a strategy of thought in resolving the tension between science and faith.

This is one thing that bugs me about evolution scientist is that they find evidence for micro evolution and then lump into together with macro and pass it off as validating scientific proof it's just poor science.

It runs down from the larynx about 7 - 8 feet, under the heart, and then 7 - 8 feet back up the neck, proving that, as the animal evolved and its neck elongated, the laryngeal nerve continues its evolution by stretching.

Ok, to go along with this incredibly fallacious line of thinking, how come, as the rest of the world embraces evolution, they have also surpassed us education of just about every discipline.

As a scientist, I'm always asking questions about the world we live in and I don't fault other scientists trying to prove evolution because that is the question they are passionate about.

What is it about our stories that should be taken seriously by those who advance theories of moral behavior as a product of evolution, or those who regard consciousness and selfhood as congeries of computational patterns constructed by neurons?

Stop talking about the Bible as if its perceived deficiencies, somehow bolster a useless childish credulity at its best fairy tale that is evolution.

Creationists» beliefs about the origins of the Earth are often a narrow focus, based in large part on religious beliefs, and while they reject evolution as «just one theory,» they often embrace other fields of science and technology.

I'm reading comments that even go as far as «explaning» evolution,, Ha, you guys are funny... please reframe from such if you only know a little about the subject, IDIOTS.

To say, as Joe says, that «God making evolution appear undirected is similar to the idea that he planted dinosaur fossils and created geological strata to fool us into thinking the earth has been around more than 6,000 years,» is in my view completely to misunderstand what scientists and ordinary people mean when they speak about random processes.