In our interview series, we talk to our favourite bloggers
about their trend predictions and styles.
In our interview series, we talk to the experts
about their trend predictions and styles.
Not exact matches
Readers are cautioned that these forward - looking statements are only
predictions and may differ materially from actual future events or results due a variety of factors, including, among other things, that conditions to the closing of the transaction may not be satisfied, the potential impact on the business of Accompany due to the uncertainty
about the acquisition, the retention of employees of Accompany and the ability of Cisco to successfully integrate Accompany and to achieve expected benefits, business and economic conditions and growth
trends in the networking industry, customer markets and various geographic regions, global economic conditions and uncertainties in the geopolitical environment and other risk factors set forth in Cisco's most recent reports on Form 10 - K and Form 10 - Q.
As part of that exploration, us scholar - columnist - bloggers have been asked to talk
about trends in our corners of the blogosphere, and make some
predictions and prescriptions for the role of scholar - op - ed - writers - bloggers in Canada as it hurtles towards 2042.
I've heard
predictions based on
trends that range from 15 years to 40 years (I think 25 years sounds
about right) where atheists will outnumber Christians in this country.
Many statistics reveal
trends, which can be used to form hypotheses and make
predictions about certain things.
Yet despite this, it is possible to use that torrent of information to make
predictions about social and economic
trends that affect us all.
Making
predictions about climate variability often means looking to the past to find
trends.
«By understanding the deep past, we have better information
about historic
trends that lead to better
predictions.
The
prediction is from their article
about future dining
trends, saying:
cool hunter noun A person whose job is to make observations or
predictions about new styles and
trends.
I gave some tips and talked
about my
predictions for fur
trends this year in a full blog post here.
I work with journalists diligently to tell the larger story
about the online dating industry, mobile apps, growth and emerging
trends,
predictions, key players, niche upstarts, and much more.
One thought
about your
prediction that the eBook
trend will wear off.
I note that the long term
trend of the
predictions about the magnitude of global warming has been to decrease over time.
[Response: the claim
about a
trend towards lower
predictions is a common skeptic claim, but its not true — William]
But all of the inputs are approximations (parameter estimates, equations, numerical methods), and the output to date shows that they have made bad
predictions about «out of sample» data — the
trend since they were published.
These findings also open for more practical use of our knowlegde
about climate change: by taking these
trends (i.e. extra information) into account, we improve our ability to make
predictions seasons ahead.
To conclude, a projection from 1981 for rising temperatures in a major science journal, at a time that the temperature rise was not yet obvious in the observations, has been found to agree well with the observations since then, underestimating the observed
trend by
about 30 %, and easily beating naive
predictions of no - change or a linear continuation of
trends.
The «random» fluctuations
about this
trend due to El Nino's etc have a standard deviation of 0.1 deg K. Only two data points deviate from the model
predictions by more than 2 standard deviations.
The theory makes
predictions about climate (30 year
trends) not weather.
He uses a method that is clearly intended to examine the long - term response of temperature to changes in carbon dioxide, and which is never used by the IPCC (nor should it be) to make
predictions about current temperature
trends.
I am making no
prediction about long term
trends in sea ice.
«To summarize - Using the 60 and 1000 year quasi repetitive patterns in conjunction with the solar data leads straightforwardly to the following reasonable
predictions for Global SSTs 1 Continued modest cooling until a more significant temperature drop at
about 2016 - 17 2 Possible unusual cold snap 2021 - 22 3 Built in cooling
trend until at least 2024 4 Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2035 — 0.15 5Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2100 — 0.5 6 General Conclusion — by 2100 all the 20th century temperature rise will have been reversed, 7 By 2650 earth could possibly be back to the depths of the little ice age.
In this problem - based data analysis activity, students identify
trends and make
predictions about the possible influence of climatic factors and vegetative growth on macro invertebrates.
Ignoring the first two years of Argo data, the warming
trend is
about 0.004 C / yr, while the (noted) IPCC
prediction is.007 C / yr.
The RealClimate
trend line starts
about 1993, so let's take the data from 1993 through 2002 and fit a straight line, then extend that line as a
prediction through 2010.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time
trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global
trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature
trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures
trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature
trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming
trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point
about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and
predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
You are taking here as settled that the
prediction is meaning that each of the next two decades will show a
trend of
about 0.2 decades.
Scientists should look to
trends before making dire
predictions about extreme weather, but the
trends show no link to climate change.
The shortest
prediction that has been quoted here is for two decades; and the IPCC states explicitly that this
prediction (of a
trend of «
about» 0.2 C / decade) is largely independent of scenarios.
I was speaking of the short term
prediction / projection for
trends over two decades which everyone here has been talking
about.
The other
prediction, which I am not rewording either, is for
about 0.2 C / decade
trend over the next two decades.
That we tend to see much more discussion
about global warming is I think because of the limitations of the climate models when they go to more regional and seasonal
predictions and refinements of max versus min temperature
trends.
It regurgitates NSIDC graphs, complete with lines of best fit that reveal the underlying downward
trend towards inevitable oblivion, without wondering why scientific
predictions from the NSIDC and elsewhere
about the future of Arctic ice are spread across a whole continent of ball parks each the size of Wales.
Granted, the
trend of this period is a mere 1 / 3rd of the IPCC
prediction of 0.2 C / decade, but what this tells us is the presence of decadal
trends might tell us almost nothing
about the climate regime we are observing.
While there is general agreement
about the modern global warming
trend (since 1850), scientific controversies increase as climate research moves further back in time, and
predictions move further into the future.
«To summarize — Using the 60 and 1000 year quasi repetitive patterns in conjunction with the solar data leads straightforwardly to the following reasonable
predictions for Global SSTs 1 Continued modest cooling until a more significant temperature drop at
about 2016 - 17 2 Possible unusual cold snap 2021 - 22 3 Built in cooling
trend until at least 2024 4 Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2035 minus 0.15 degrees 5Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2100 minus 0.5 degrees 6 General Conclusion — by 2100 all the 20th century temperature rise will have been reversed, 7 By 2650 earth could possibly be back to the depths of the little ice age.
assuming what you say
about skeptics changing topic as you describe is accurate, and at this point I do we are talking
about data that is less than 200 years old, out of which extraordinary claims are made as to how that data relates to distant past and future
trends tough sell assuming that all adjustments to the data are scientifically sound, It is very difficult for me to believe that measurements that have gone through so many iterations can be trusted to.0 and.00 in most other sciences, I doubt they would tough sell (the photo of the thermometer is downright funny) in terms of goal post moving I observe predicted heat being re-branded as «missing» a
prediction of no snow re-branded as more snow a warming world re-branded to a «warm, cold, we don't know what to expect» world topped off with suggestions that one who thinks the above has some sort of psychological disorder extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence especially when you are teaching children that their world is endangered
With those parameters monitored, and a bit of historical data on them, you can make very good
predictions about the
trend in rpm of the engine based upon changes in inputs without knowing very much
about how the engine translates fuel into motion.
Had I been making a
prediction about how HadCRU would respond to the apparent error published by Thompson et al, I would have predicted that they would say that it didn't matter for recent
trends.
Dr. Latif is not making any
predictions about what will happen after 2015 — other than that the long - term temperature warming
trend driven by anthropogenic GHGs will continue and that the near - term temperature
trend must catch up with the long - term
trend, likely during a period of rapid warming.
At this time of year many legal bloggers are busy making
predictions about what major
trends, technologies and shifts we'll be seeing in the legal space in the coming year.
Those on the pro-EU side who disagree with this analysis have to face a fact: people like Mandelson, Adair Turner, the FT, and the Economist have been repeatedly wrong in their
predictions for 20 years
about «EU reform», and people like me who have made the same arguments for 20 years, and called bullshit on «EU reform», have been repeatedly vindicated by actual EU Treaties, growth rates, unemployment
trends, euro crises and so on.
When I composed a blog post around
about this time last year, on
trends to look out for in the media in 2017, I mostly eschewed concrete
predictions.
They then work to determine
trends and
predictions about a whole lot of different subjects.
The Fast Track: Tools to Get the Job Done Fast Intuit Quick Base has a robust blog for career growth overall, with posts
about technology
trends and
predictions, advice from experts
about dealing with colleagues, and lots of posts
about how to work to improve your career.
Career Brander Blog
About Career Brander «Job Search Radar The Hidden Job Market» Ten 2010
Predictions: job search and otherwise Published December 24, 2009 Uncategorized Leave a Comment Tags: 2010 job search
trends, career marketing
trends, hr - xml, job board listings, job search
trends, linkedin, personal branding, resume formatting, twitter for jobsearch Corporate recruiters will fully embrace social network recruiting.
Write
about local real estate conditions, such as home prices, sales
trends, market forecasts and
predictions, etc..
Read below to learn more
about three
trend -
predictions for the Orange County real estate market this spring.