I second the points made by Ramez Naam
about the trad pub income streams that aren't reflected here.
Sometimes they» l fuss
about the trad pub prices, but don't seem to realize why there is a price different in my series.
My work doesn't qualify for any awards; mystery conventions are all
about the trad pubbed authors (whose work I love), but shut out the indies.
Not exact matches
She got so much buzz
about her decision to turn down a
trad pub contract to go indie, that everyone wanted to read or at least look at the book.
One of the things that struck me, and probably many others,
about his report and its conclusions, is that self -
pubbed titles tend to average higher review ratings than
trad -
pubbed books.
My first traditionally published novel, Transgression, only sold
about 6,000 copies in its
trad -
pubbed edition.
I've been fielding emails for years from readers asking why that book was priced so high when the rest of the books in the series (this is the series that started out in
trad pub and that is now self
pub) ranged from free to
about $ 4.99.
Elizabeth, I have learnt much from your post
about «
trad pub» and «self -
pub,» especially since I'm working on my own fiction.
When you think
about it, it makes sense: back when
trad pub limited us to one book a year per author, there were still plenty of people who became fans of Terry Prachett, Mercedes Lackey, Patricia Briggs and David Weber.
I rarely comment on posts like this — I know very little
about the
trad -
pubbed world:).
I have people writing to me on Facebook and in email and talking to me in person
about how much they love my books, and here I am envying the awards and the accolades, certain that a
trad pub deal was the only way I could get them.
Joe speaks boldly
about his dislike of the
trad pub scene and why the ball is no longer all in the publisher's court.
However, we know they're elitists from things they've said in the past
about self - published books being of lesser quality compared to
trad pub books (how ironic that now
trad pub authors are complaining more
about their books having so many typos and problems when printed).
The promotion the
trad pubs take care of is the catalog and sales force to get your books into the brick and mortar distribution channel, which indies don't worry
about.
But when I think
about the NA I'd have missed covering if I only covered the
trad -
pubbed stuff, I'd have missed all but one of my five - star titles.
I get that I'm supposed to be more upset
about this paid review service, but what Locke did doesn't look different to me than Kirkus Reviews (and, as you point out, other favor trades from
trad pubbing that are entrenched and go unremarked.)
The majority of self -
pubbed writers are not serious or realistic
about it, and they would have been unlikely to have been successful in
trad publishing either.
Because this is just what
trad -
pubbed authors probably thought
about Amazon's launch of KDP.
I truly thinks it benefits us all to learn
about self -
pub and
trad -
pub methods.
If terms could be better for writers, then I think many of us would feel better
about going with
trad pub / indie
pub.
The more I read
about trad -
pub, and the more unsatisfactory new releases I read from that system, the less I question its value.
My writer's group had a discussion
about this last night, and no one's happy
about it, even
trad -
pubbed authors.
Boo hoo, all the authors (
trad pub) interviewed vilifying Amazon, talking
about how Amazon is so big, mean, terrible, stealing money and food and possibly even sex from them.
When you have only
about five to ten years to create a «writing career,» you have to get it done faster than the
trad -
pub route moves.
And it doean't matter whose fault it is — the publisher is invisible to the reader (as many a
trad pub author who's gotten complaints
about covers or copyediting can attest.)
Because thinking
about it now, Amazon should have gamed out the possibility that
Trad Pub goes under when BN does.
I think this kind of freedom is what I love most
about self - publishing, and it's equally open to
trad -
pub authors like Kate above (assuming you don't have a non-compete clause in your contract) as it is to self - published authors.
Now, you Sharks - and - Jets squabblers can keep doing the Beat It knife dance on message boards (aka Thunderdome)
about how much better Self -
Pub is over
Trad -
Pub, and vice versa.
p.s. I'll have to think
about doing that post on the sweat equity that goes into marketing self -
pub vs.
trad pub.
Trad pub is
about the bottom line, because it has to be.
It's not just having to arrange for your own editing via the
trad publishing route — when I read arguments against self -
pubbing, I always hear
about how hard it is to market your books and find your readers.
Lawyer David Vandagriff, who runs The Passive Voice and who comments using the handle Passive Guy, said it was «interesting how little many of these big - selling
trad pub authors understand
about the book business», claiming that this came from «listening to what their publishers and agents tell them».
Heather, the thing you are overlooking in
trad pubbed VS self
pubbed are the indies like me who hire a professional team and follow the good parts
about the NY model.