Not exact matches
By respecting equally the
life of the
unborn child and the
life of the mother, by supporting notification and consent before an abortion involving a minor, by offering ministries to reduce unintended pregnancy, by affirming (and encouraging church support of) crisis pregnancy centers, and by urging family counsel in decision - making
about abortion, the additional language is decisively pro-
life.
He believed in saving the
life of the
unborn and considered them very much human just like God and the Bible clearly talk
about that all
life is important in God's eyes...
It is
about fundin other more controversial «birth control» products that take the
life of
unborn children (you have to remember the perspective here that there is an underlying belief that
life begins at conception).
What frustrates me
about the pro-choice movement is the lengths to which advocates go to de-humanize
unborn children and sanitize the abortion procedure, reducing
life to nothing more than a cluster of cells and the implications of pregnancy to little more than a choice.
His support for the
unborn resonated with Americans fighting the consequences of Roe v. Wade: The right to
life movement received a new language and dimension when he first spoke about a «Culture of Life» in 1993 — significantly, during a visit to America — and two years later, described his full vision in his great encyclical, Evangelum Vi
life movement received a new language and dimension when he first spoke
about a «Culture of
Life» in 1993 — significantly, during a visit to America — and two years later, described his full vision in his great encyclical, Evangelum Vi
Life» in 1993 — significantly, during a visit to America — and two years later, described his full vision in his great encyclical, Evangelum Vitae.
The author is concerned
about the
unborn child, yet voted for Obama who would not even defend the right to
life of a baby who survives an abortion!!
Nine mentions of the «
unborn life» and not a word
about the already
living woman.
If he knowingly commits a post-24 weeks abortion, based on such stringent
life and health criteria, the doctor must certify his judgment
about the threat in writing; acquire the concurrence of a second doctor in that judgment based on a «separate personal medical examination» of the woman; perform the abortion in a hospital; employ procedures designed to maximize the
unborn child's chances to survive; and have a second physician present, ready to consider any surviving child his primary patient.
The Hawaiian court has thus set itself on the same course of action as the misguided Supreme Court in 1973 when it thought that laws
about abortion were merely an assertion of the rights of a
living mother and an
unborn fetus.
We don't cherish
life in the nation, we have at least 2 generations that have grown up with the fact that Roe v. Wade is law of the land and if we don't care
about the
unborn, how can we care
about a
living person?
Like George Carlin says, the religious are always talking
about the sancti - ty of
life for the
unborn, but once your here F - you your one your own.
Meanwhile, China reaches deep into the family
lives of its citizens: Its «family planning» policies, including forced abortions, have brought
about the world's highest number of deaths of
unborn children.
And why are we giving the culture of Washington new powers of
life and death» making ourselves «God's Partners,» in President Obama's language» at a time when that culture has proved itself so vague and so deluded
about all the issues of
life and death that have come before it: war, and embryos, and the
unborn, and the weak, and the vulnerable?
Mixed in amongst a slew of lies
about the status of
unborn life, the feminists offer a reassuring dose of reality.
Hillary Clinton faced criticism from both sides of the abortion debate after she waded into the fraught argument
about when
life begins by describing the
unborn as a «person.»