Sentences with phrase «about underlying warming»

Obviously this is because you're going from day to night; a natural cycle that doesn't contain useful information about underlying warming or cooling.

Not exact matches

The new fund — «Warm and Well Cornwall» — targets residents who are in poor health or at risk of ill health, or with underlying health issues, or caring for a vulnerable person or worried about their home being cold or damp.

Although the amendments may elicit politically tantalizing information about lawmakers» views on climate science, they don't address the underlying questions about the pipeline: Will the project contribute greatly to the warming problem?

Maybe it's just warming up, maybe there are underlying issues we don't know about (doubtful).

The bottom - line is; your senior dog's excessive panting is telling you something while it may be simple like they are too warm or nervous about something, it could also be the sign of an underlying medical issue, especially if it is combined with other symptoms or goes on for prolonged periods.

Since the science and theory linking global warming in the short term is much weaker than the underlying rationale for long - term global warning, arguing about short term trends is dangerous.

Maybe by that time most of the field would be convinced that the 60 -70-year quasi-kinda-periodic «cycle» was real, with some nice hypotheses about the underlying physics, and the coming decades would warm again.

But they do not disagree about the underlying chemistry and physics of their enterprise — all of which show that people are warming the planet through their industrial greenhouse - gas emissions.

Produce some random data sets (with an underlying linear trend — there clearly is some real warming going on — or was until about 2000) until you get a few that look broadly like the observed data.

What does this tell us about the underlying forcing causing the warmer temps duirng periods in which the atmosphere is in general getting less energy from the ocean?

What this discussion should be about is the IPCC hypothesis and whether the warming plateau in the surface temperature trend weakens its underlying assumptions and conclusions?

Finally, while economics may be critical to your definition of «catastrophic» anthropogenic global warming, economics says nothing about the science underlying the projections of sea level rise, the physics of Arctic amplification, changes to albedo that lead to greater warming that may lead to significant releases of methane clathrate deposits, regional projections of reduce (or enhanced) precipitation, and so on.

Of course, the underlying assumption is that we know about and have some understanding of ALL other factors that could contribute to warming over a 30 year period of time.

These events seem to have become a Rorschach test of underlying opinions about the reality of global warming.

What I find most curious about this and other studies involving important global warming issues is that some rather indirect methods are used to measure trends with little attention being paid to better understanding the underlying basics principles and processes involved.

«The schoolteachers that peddle climate p ** n in the nations» classrooms are **** about their underlying motives and don't know **** from **** about global warming or what it takes to earn a living in the real world.

An expert elicitation is used to help rank their sensitivity to global warming and the uncertainty about the underlying physical mechanisms.

However the underlying logarithmic term shows that the actual enhanced warming was more like the 1940 - 2008 value of 0.45 C. Therefore climate models are likely over-estimating AGW by about 50 %.

The underlying rate of warming has been about 0.6 C per century since the record started in the latter 19th century.

And because heat can be stored in places other than at the surface, a lack of surface warming for a decade tells you almost nothing about the underlying long - term warming trends... I judge that there is virtually no merit to suggestions that the «hiatus» poses a serious challenge to the standard model [of human - caused global warming].»

Although the melting of underlying permafrost will release huge amounts of the greenhouse gases blamed for fueling global warming, researchers who sampled three sites in boreal Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba have discovered that the warmer, softer, wetter soil that results also promotes the growth of new mosses that capture and store about as much carbon from the atmosphere as the thawed ground releases.

Underlying this new pessimism is increased concern about feedback effects — for example, the release of methane, a significant greenhouse gas, from seabeds and tundra as the planet warms.