Sentences with phrase «about value for money»

However, if you think about value for money and getting a great Android experience which is readily possible on most flagship phones released in the past two years, then LG G6 is an amazing choice to go with.

There's so much variety and depth here that The Behemoth could have sold this game in a box at retail for three times as much without anyone complaining about value for money.

Transistor is a short game which is for the best as it starts to say goodbye just as things verge on overstaying their welcome but for those who worry about value for money there are challenge modes (speed trials, efficiency trials where you get a limited number of moves to wipe out the enemy and a wave survival mode) and a NG + to keep you going back.

The fact that the $ 299 Sony Reader Touch Edition sold more than the $ 199 Sony Reader Pocket Edition hints that eReader buyers care more about value for money and value - add features than low prices.

However, its convincingly luxurious personality, impressive list of standard and available equipment, and competitive base prices make the G80 worth checking out if you care about value for the money more than country - club cred in your luxury sedan.

Welfare in the Police Service has in our view suffered greatly in recent years as policing becomes more concerned about value for money and less people conscious.

«The event will give us a snap shot of what young people think about the youth services that adults provide for them and about the value for money of these services.

«They really think about value for the money, especially in the food industry, so if you can make a product work here compared to Tokyo, it'll more likely work in the rest of Japan.»

Not exact matches

This point might seem semantic when we're talking about resources that people uniformly value — like money for example.

«Amazon is as much about «value» as «cheap,»» Stefan Weitz, executive vice president of technology services for the e-commerce management firm Radial, told MONEY via email.

He had an instinctual understanding of human nature, and was pretty obsessed about giving customers value for their money.

That's a good opening for you to ask about fees in general, to ensure that you're paying the least amount of money, for the most value.

While nobody disputes the value of Habitat for Humanity's work, he said, the rest of the money raises questions about how it was decided who would be cut a cheque.

BizWorld.org Jump $ tart Coalition Clearinghouse Junior Achievement USA TheMint.org - Fun Financial Literacy Activities for Kids, Teens, Parents and Teachers NEFE's High School Financial Planning Program The Stock Market Game US Treasury - Kids Zone Value Stock Guide: The Stock Market Game for Kids — Free Resources and Lesson Plans Wise Pockets World (for kids, parents, and teachers to learn about managing money)

For example, if a brand incentivizes and influencer to write about their company (whether it be free products, swag, free tickets to an event, etc.), then would that be native advertising or content marketing, because money hasn't been exchanged, but value has.

When the network of confidence breaks down, you end up with a situation where people are holding securities, nervous about a possible loss of access to their money, while prevailing prices are still way above intrinsic value, i.e., way above the prices that they would demand in order to compensate for a loss of liquidity.

But if you are serious about making your money work for you through stocks and related instruments, this workshop will empower you towards achieving your goal in a sensible way through value investing, the time tested method.

a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a sense of right and wrong is fine, but organized religions are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation are only focused on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)

Williams also said that the money should be used to create long - term benefits: «Effective aid is not about creating dependence but helping people become valued partners and co-workers for a safe and equitable world.»

Each 3 pack will make about 40 cups of stock, which is fantastic value for money!

Overall I would say Sanchez was just about good value for the money and wages we paid but OZIL was largely a waste of money, despite his undoubted huge talent, on the low percentage of occasions he could be arsed to show it.

Anyway, Mino is the last man we should have listen about footballers value for money.

Two things here is about their quality and value for money.

It means that Wenger is very careful about getting good value for money and bringing in the right player.

wenger should consider draxler or pedro (who i personally think would be value for money replacement and gives you the same qualities as corzola and at 27 would be around for his peak) if you sell corzola for # 10 - 12 million then pedro only cost about # 10 million once you take off the selling funds that's a bargain for a quality replacement, draxler would be a more expensive and long term replacement.

My problem now lies with the cost; for years now we have been moaning about the board not allocating money to Wenger, which the last time i wrote on this website dispelled as a lie; he justified spending # 16 Million on Calum Chambers; which with the greatest of respect, I'm yet to see him pay of 50 % of that value.

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

The average annual value is «just» $ 25 million, which for luxury tax purposes isn't extraordinary, but again, it's a deal for a player who could very well already be under contract for the entire rest of his MLB career, so the money we're talking about here is unheard of.

I seem to agree that Kawhi's not about the money, that he'd work his ass off in practice and in a game to win for his team... and i doubt Kawhi wants all this attention on him now... but given all these leaks from former players and media sources about leaving SA, getting more money and getting into a bigger media market / shoe deal, that's not Kawhi at all... it has to be something / someone... looking at his camp... logically SAS wouldn't be leaking these unless they are nudging him to leave, and for what, for inevitably way lesser value in whatever trade they get into.

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Unlike the January of 2013, in which Liverpool managed to secure deals for both Daniel Sturridge and Philippe Coutinho at cut - prices, the club has now realised that these high - value deals are a rarity, and the likelihood of them is rather slim, but also that there is a need and requirement to pay the money when the time is right — it seems Jürgen Klopp has helped bring about that realisation.

Wenger's words yesterday can't be taken at face value at all, as we've been told about how there is money available for seasons and seasons now, and little has changed in terms of the transfer policy.

Fathers need to teach their daughters about money and about respect and about valuing themselves, standing up for themselves, and speaking out when it's necessary.

In «Jané Trider Extreme Stroller reviews» when we talk about compatibility then obviously stroller is very much luxuries with attractive look & good features, & if you want value for money then you can go for it if you can compromise with the heavy weight.

Well... «Cybex PRIAM Stroller Review» cant be complete without talking about «Value for Money» «Cybex PRIAM stroller really worth it for this, a complete safe, stylish, luxurious, comfortable & most importantly durable stroller for travelling for long & short trips & to carry forward for your second or third baby.

Sponsor Spotlight: Kiki's Fashions Prize: gift certificate Value: $ 25 I love wearing cute maternity clothing but it's definitely not in the budget to spend tons of money on items that will only fit for about 9 months.

The fact the seat units can go from carrycot to infant seat in seconds made it feel more value for money and I didn't have to worry about pram parts cluttering up the place after a few months.

One thing we love about this item is that it grows with your baby, offering great value for money.

The price is about what one can expect when looking to purchase an adjustable basketball hoop, and it offers great value for money.

But it is the duty of government to make difficult choices about priorities and to get maximum value for every pound of taxpayer money it spends.

• Key quotes from the NAO report: o «The source of many problems has been the absence of a detailed view of how Universal Credit is meant to work» [page 33] o «The Department is unable to explain to us why it originally decided to aim for national roll - out from October 2013» [Para 3.7] o «In early 2013, it (DWP) did not have a convincing strategic plan in place» [3.35] o «It is unlikely that UC will be as simple or cheap to administer as originally intended» [15, summary] o «the Department has not achieved value for money... wider concerns about the Department's ability to deal with weak programme management, over-optimistic timescales and a lack of openness about progress.»

In his latest statement on getting better value for money from taxpayers» spending on politics David Cameron has written for the Belfast Telegraph about politicians sitting in two legislatures:

I have learned so much about making public bodies work better, and getting good value for money, it would be crazy not to build on it.»

But the majority of lobbyists in the UK's # 2 billion public affairs industry work in - house for large organisations or for agencies, raising value - for - money questions about the estimated # 50,000 initial annual cost of the register.

But Sir John remained concerned about value - for - money, however, adding: «Although some of the department's initiatives lead to earlier interception of overpayments and may deter potential fraudsters, I believe the department could do more to determine whether its activities are cost - effective.»

It is worried by government departments» apparent lack of interest in value for money and warned about the absence of quality control in the policy - making process.

These are matters that we've thrown out which reinforce the discussion about corruption and absence for value for money of what we are doing in Ghana.

«It is good that the government is upfront about extra funding, but the case for judging this absolutely has to be value for money,» he said.

The Public Procurement Minister used the occasion to inform the Education Minister and his team about some of the government policies she is implementing to strengthen the country's procurement system to ensure value for money.