Sentences with phrase «about wealth distribution»

What are you talking about wealth distribution.

And you talk about wealth distribution.

Not exact matches

Buffett does seem concerned about the uneven distribution of that wealth.

«Our own performance in our own wealth management business, including our own distribution, has been very, very good and overall we remain positive about everything we've built.

He said she probably would have further pursued another area that previous Fed leaders rarely spoke about — issues related to the nation's wealth distribution.

Those with wealth, who are closely tied to the banking community, govern capital accumulation and, with it, decisions about employment technology, income distribution, work organization, consumption patterns, and even our relations with other nations.

The Constitution says nothing about relating the democratic process to the distribution of wealth and income, and for a good reason: The social and economic prerequisites for equal standing in the democratic process depend on one's vision of social justice.

There were of course some sharp questions about the unequal distribution of wealth and power, hut beyond that was the question whether the quality life was a simple function of wealth and power, or whether the endless accumulation of wealth and power was not destroying the quality and meaning of life, ecologically and sociologically.

«We need», McFadden continued, «to speak about wealth creation and not just wealth distribution.»

High earners are always in denial about how exceptional they are, while Labour over the years has colluded by failing to tell the true story about the distribution of wealth and earnings.

You've always been sceptical... Yes, because those who enthused most refused to talk about the distribution of wealth, about democracy — they wanted us to technologise our way out of the problems.

«Having wealthy neighbors may skew beliefs about overall wealth distribution.»

It's not for everyone - consider yourself warned - but there's no denying that this is a well - made, well - acted film loaded with satirical subtext, particularly about America's distribution of wealth.

Andrew Niccol's In Time has a number of interesting ideas about society and the distribution of wealth, but the movie and its cast have trouble expressing them in a satisfying or subtle way.

The main competition is filled with movies about the ailing world of limited means and unjust distribution of wealth, and after the bizarre and derivative allegory of labor in Vahid Vakilifar's Taboor and Amir Manor's astutely titled Epilogue, which played like Michael Haneke's Amour, only capitalism as a stand - in for death, the main competition now brings us Sylvie Michel - Casey's Our Little Differences.

Economics: Under this, scholars are taught about the production, distribution, consumption of goods and services, and transfer of wealth.

Along the way, she raises significant questions about the origins of evil, the capability of the individual and the distribution of wealth and power.

Learn everything you need to know about how mutual fund distributions are taxed and how becoming a tax - efficient investor will help you build wealth over the long - term.

Oxfam made its calculations about global wealth distribution based on the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Data book, and calculated the wealth of the world's richest people using the annual billionaires list from Forbes Magazine, which was last published in Marchwealth distribution based on the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Data book, and calculated the wealth of the world's richest people using the annual billionaires list from Forbes Magazine, which was last published in MarchWealth Data book, and calculated the wealth of the world's richest people using the annual billionaires list from Forbes Magazine, which was last published in Marchwealth of the world's richest people using the annual billionaires list from Forbes Magazine, which was last published in March 2016.

They don't like to talk about the distribution of wealth at the national level, much less the global level — where, as none other than Pope Francis has recently reminded us, we owe the developing world, the poorest people on the planet, a massive ecological and climate debt.

It's a global model so it doesn't tell us anything about climate equity or the distribution of mitigation efforts, wealth or improved lifestyles.

(And though it is a less important point, I doubt all the authors of the NCC paper are entirely happy about the distribution of the third revolution's copious «new wealth».)

Instead, the time is ripe for the world to embrace cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology and use it to bring about true distribution of wealth.

Edward N. Wolff, an economist at New York State University, points out that «median wealth [the wealth of the household in the middle of the distribution] was about 10 percent lower in 1995 than in 1983.»