Sentences with phrase «about wind turbines who»

On those occasions when disagreement and sometimes conflict have arisen, from my experience it is most often those who spread misinformation and unfounded rumours about wind turbines who have been the cause.

Not exact matches

Along the way, we are treated to Isabel's philosophical musings on many diverse subjects: being polite, or saying what you really feel; landscape painters taking artistic licence; the purpose of art; adoption; head lice; which bodily afflictions are too personal to talk about; sarcasm; swearing; wind turbines; jumping to conclusions; religion; children's literature; dogs dreaming; metaphors; how to end arguments and knowing who you are.

She describes a farmer in Montana who had been skeptical about the need for an energy revolution but is now getting more income from wind - turbine leases than agriculture.

Identifying that some people who have one or more acknowledged risk factors prior to Industrial Wind Turbines beginning to operate provides information about predictable health problems which may ensue with exposure to infrasound and low frequency noise.

A significant number of people, who live in proximity to Industrial Wind Turbines, complain about a variety of physical and emotional symptoms.

I have talked to a friend who run the crew that maintains 50 wind turbines in wyoming about this idea.

That evidence completely contradicts the wind industry lie that turbine hosts never, ever complain; a piece of propaganda cooked up by its media manipulators — including a former tobacco advertising guru — who run the story that it's only «jealous» wind farm neighbours who complain about wind turbine noise, «jealous» because they're not getting paid.

For those of us who learned about nuclear power in school but nothing about wind turbines, here's a simple explanation of how wind turbines work, with a brief history of the industry.

Laforet says he is concerned about «wind turbine syndrome,» the term some use to describe the symptoms of people who say they have been sickened by the noise.

Of course, that summary omits all the caveats about mortalities Lovich et al might have missed, about the Mesa Wind Project being one development in a sea of larger turbines, about absence of evidence not being evidence of absence, fewer eagles per year and so forth, so wind fans who pride themselves on their science literacy might have second thougWind Project being one development in a sea of larger turbines, about absence of evidence not being evidence of absence, fewer eagles per year and so forth, so wind fans who pride themselves on their science literacy might have second thougwind fans who pride themselves on their science literacy might have second thoughts.

One «argument» you might come across if you point out the science about turbines and health is «So you believe that all those people who have reported to wind farm inquiries about their health problems are telling lies!».

Support for the Danish and Swedish academic opposition to the new, lax legislation on wind turbine noise being concocted in Copenhagen has been coming from a number of noise engineers, acousticians, doctors, psychologists and nurses in the UK, the US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, etc. who have expressed in conferences and in the media their concern about the failure of governments to address properly the wind farm health problem.

Lloyd was writing about a «study» that was based on only six self - selected subjects who claimed to be adversely affected by nearby wind turbines while over a hundred more were apparently unaffected by the turbines and not included in the study.

I can accept that some people don't like wind turbines on aesthitic grounds, I agree that there are some genuine and valid problems with wind farms; but I refuse to turn a blind eye to people who tell lies about wind turbines.

A typical modern, utility - scale, wind turbine will generate about as much clean electricity as 2000 average roof - top solar installations (around 2012, see here), so you would think that people who want action on climate change would support wind power.

Boss continues: «In some epidemics, actual clinical illness in some group members may spread as epidemic hysteria by the transmission of anxiety to groups observing those who were initially ill»; this sounds similar to the spreading of hysteria about wind turbines by people like Dr Nina Pierpont and Sarah Laurie, who condition people to expect to feel ill if they go anywhere near a wind farm.

A survey of those people who live near wind turbines, their health problems, and aiming to establish whether those problems are related to the turbines, to perceptions about the turbines or totally unrelated to the turbines.