I note it says rights should encompass living standards, which suggests that there should be a right given to the needs of life; however then what is the other stuff on there
about with free speech and all which has nothing to do with that?
Not exact matches
But part of my fascination
with representing activists and organizers is really
about free speech.
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out
about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do
with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak
about there faith I agree
with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to
free speech also.
While I do support
free speech, I can't deny my in ability to sort all this out from where I happen to be, dissociated from the major «players» having direct involvement
with the situation at hand (which has gone way beyond what I thought this thread would be
about, initially).
How
about human rights,
free speech??? Where is the US government, why don't they raise the issue
with the Pakistani government?
The NFL Players» Union issued a statement defending its members right to
free speech, saying «It is a source of enormous pride that some of the best conversations
about these issues have taken place in our locker rooms in a respectful, civil and thoughtful way that should serve as a model for how all of us can communicate
with each other.
Something
about the campus environment predisposes students to react to seemingly negligible events (an email
about Halloween costumes, rumors of exclusion from a frat party, one person hearing racial slurs from a passing driver)
with shocking levels of anxiety, including a particular distress
about free and therefore potentially offensive
speech.
In each of these cases, talk
with your child's teacher
about the problem, and make an appointment
with the school's
speech - language pathologist for a
free speech and language screening.
Cabinet Office questions are winding up
with another volley of attacks
about the limits it places on
free speech.
Lord Leveson, who appeared more irritated
with Mr Gove than he has
with any witness during the inquiry, replied: «Mr Gove I don't need to be told
about the importance of
free speech - I really don't.
It is equally not
about free speech or press freedom because as my view is that no rational human being can justify what they said because it has nothing to
with free speech and press freedom.
We can now create our own content and share it
with audiences large and small, so we should worry
about anyone who aims to stand in the way of the transmission of
free speech — just as we would worry
about someone who would try to block you from telephoning a friend, or using a fax machine to send them a document.
These meetings are
free of cost and held in a public space, typically beginning
with a short
speech from an elected official and then an open Q&A, where attendees can ask questions
about a piece of legislation or a specific issue.
-LSB-...] my way home from work Friday afternoon, I listened to another favorite Podcast, The Creative Penn, and they talked
about hands -
free writing
with dictation, or
speech - to - text.
Because now readers are demanding more and more low - priced and
free e-books, and don't even feel guilty
about it because they feel that publishers tried to take advantage of them
with overpriced e-books, delayed releases, poor formatting, blocking lending, blocking text - to -
speech, and invasive DRM.
Why stop so short, when the complete application really needs to add text to
speech functionality, so many software for
free available out there, please, give us a complete kindle
with text to
speech capability, think
about how many life could be changed, especially those in the campus and technology area.
Those years — Alisha calls them «adult - ing» — were all
about work (for her, at a nonprofit focused on
free speech) and study (for him), threaded
with raising two Boston terriers, Murphy and Millie, making friends, and exploring the city's alleyways and pocket parks.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday
about whether banning a license plate
with a Confederate flag on it violates
free speech.
JimD FYI the very serious problem
with Benghazi is the known false cover story (BTW I know a lot
about the specific details of this event) not so bad except for the poor wannabe movie maker they arrested to cover their lie
free speech... once a liberal value I am a «denier» because of my best evaluation of the evidence not because I'm «scared» of a carbon tax not because I don't like Obama
With this latest report, environmental activists and their state AG allies will have a tougher time arguing that their campaign is not
about suppressing
free speech.
With a cabal of attorneys general gathering information
about Exxon and its withholding of information that it had
about the risks of climate change, some, not Eli to be sure, but some who the bunnies would not be surprised to have identified, are seeking to frame the matter as an issue of
free speech.
Otherwise one might think that as
with holocaust denial, and hand - wringing
about a loss of
free speech, you are holding a serious issue like McCarthyism hostage to score points in the climate wars.
It would not be feasible (or consistent
with free speech values) to give people the right to force newspapers — or, say, gossip blogs — to erase non-defamatory content
about themselves, simply because it paints them in a less - than - positive light..
«Court allows suit over e-mails»: The Atlanta Journal - Constitution today contains an article that begins, «In a legal decision that troubles some
free -
speech advocates, the Georgia Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who complained in e-mails
about the care her mentally disabled son was receiving through a nonprofit organization that provides resources to families
with disabled members.
It is not merely coincident
with the start of the Supreme Court term that lots of people seem to be talking
about free speech.
As for the aforementioned New York Times piece
about Peltz's lawsuit, it concludes
with what may be a classic case of understatement: «The Arkansas case could do more than give law students practical experience before they take the bar; it could also renew debate
about free speech on campus and academic freedom.»
I've been following the posts and comments
about anonymous blogging and
free speech rights
with interest.
I don't know where the parameters of
free speech should be, I just know that we need to recognize that vital though it is, other values (equality, in particular, as well as people's entitlement not to be lied
about and maligned
with impunity) are also.
, legislative facts and law (the WHO website shows that drinking water is not safe in that country, so little Jethro won't be moving overseas
with dad any time soon), or less crucially
about everyday society, like contextual facts and definitions — such as how
free speech is jealously protected, how children can't really be blamed for being born out of wedlock, or how married women are natural bartenders.