Sentences with phrase «about your evolution on»

I've asked questions about evolution on here before, and had people start calling me derogatory names.

Can you talk about your evolution on this point?

Not exact matches

Some museums have pushed a mission to educate the public about the evolution of the penal system, but there has been criticism that, depending on the institution, the «history» is sanitized, leaving out abuse of prisoners and other unsavory aspects of the criminal justice system.

Public attention is about to be grabbed by the rapid evolution of the auto dashboard, as carmakers and tech giants work out bringing to the car the Internet experience consumers have gotten used to on their smartphones.

After showing footage of «Alita: Battle Angel» at CinemaCon on Thursday, Rodriguez and producer Jon Landau («Avatar» movies) sat down with Business Insider to talk about the evolution of the project and why this manga won't end up like the big - screen version of «Ghost in the Shell.»

Early on in our history when things weren't really going well — we had hit a tough patch and a lot of people wanted to buy Facebook — I went and I met with Steve Jobs, and he said that to reconnect with what I believed was the mission of the company, I should go visit this temple in India that he had gone to early in the evolution of Apple, when he was thinking about what he wanted his vision of the future to be... That reinforced to me the importance of what we were doing, and that is something I will always remember.

Three years ago, I blogged about the results that Mike published with Berkeley's Emmanuel Saez on the evolution of top income shares in Canada up to 2000.

Le Maire elaborated about Landau's special task: «This mission will propose reorientations on the evolution of [cryptocurrency, and] regulation to better control development, prevent their use for [the] purposes of tax evasion, money laundering, or financing of criminals or terrorism.»

Among the topics on the agenda: the evolution of shareholder activism and research findings about activist funds» returns, the amended Shareholder Rights Directive (EU) 2017/828, litigation and its effectiveness as tool for activist investors, and what can an issuer do to adequately address activists» new challenges.

«The Central Bank Brazil is following the evolution of the use of such instruments and discussions in international forums on the subject — in particular about their nature, ownership and operation,» the bank said.

It's human nature to zero in on threats: evolution wired us to worry about the animals that want to eat us.»

Making a judgement about a faith, be it Christianity or Islam, on the basis of a few extremists has about the same logical errancy as saying evolution is false because Hitler's murderous race purification rampage was fueled by his study of Darwin's theory, a truth written by Hitler himself.

How about teaching different theories on our creation beside the unproven theory of evolution?

Interestingly, the Times story does not mention the North American Man - Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), an organization that has the merit of being utterly straightforward on a subject about which the Times, at least at this point in its political evolution, feels compelled to be somewhat coy.

I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the religious community.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Evolved DNA What we know about evolution does not have any relevance on the truth of the Bible.

When someone tells me that «evolution is only a theory» I ask them about their opinion on the theory of gravity (generally I tell them that I totally agree!

The gang also talks about the evolution of late - night comedy and the war on drugs.

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

The theory ABOUT evolution most widely accepted is an updating of Charles Darwin's hypothesis that all of today's species descended from common ancestors due to natural selection based on best current fitness for constantly changing environmental circmmstances.

Please do your research on the subject matter, as there is much more to learn about human evolution.

You are so prepared to believe all of this without any physical proof and yet you are happy to discount a physical, observable, analyzable fossil record that shows a consistent and worldwide evolution of life on Earth dating back to about 3,500,000,000 years ago.

@Stevie — Okay, then what about the Columbine shootings, in which the two killers were yelling about natural selection and posted on their site that they were doing it to promote evolution?

With all the emphasis on creation or evolution coming out of the first few chapters of Genesis, we often miss some of the most important ideas about our humanity and how God created us (not physically, but spiritually and psychologically).

and the next man goes on about fancy words in the theory of evolution, still not touching the fact that evolution is a shaky theory at best.

The consensus on the evolution of primitive life is that simple life forms (prokaryotes, organisms whose cells lack a distinct nucleus) inhabited the Earth about 3 - 4 billion years ago, eukaryotic cells (those with a nucleus which contains the genetic material) emerging 2 - 3 billion years ago.

The work he was describing in the seminar was, as the Institute's on - line notice said, an attempt to «cut through both sides of the increasingly polarised debate about how the universe was created, with atheistic Darwinians declaring the death of God, whilst anti-Darwinian creationists denounce evolution as fraud.»

Some poor girl... or sheep... has to listen to him rant and spew, eyes bulging, talking non-stop, adamantly raging on about how Russian miners have heard the screams of hell and how some ancient vanished superrace made the pyramids and modern man couldn't which means evolution is wrong... she'd be wondering if she should just run for it, or does he have a big kitchen knife on him ready to use if she does... there she sits, with that «please - don «t - stab - me - repeatedly smile on he fear - petrified face...

If you want to get a sneak peek at what the Christian community will be talking about in 5 - 10 years, just spend some time on a Christian college campus.From evolution to religious pluralism to homosexuality, the issues that play out on the national scene often begin in classrooms, late - night dorm room discussions, and chapel services.

The assumption was on the part of the religious that what we do not understand must be the work of a god — except that over the last few centuries we understand more about creation — big bang, evolution, etc. which shows those creation stories to be incorrect.

The Utah compromise, and the conference address by Elder Oaks, have led some to think that Latter - Day Saints teaching was about to undergo some kind of evolution on the question of same - sex marriage.

On questions about evolution, the origin of life and the future of the planet, I look into the science box.

Old debates about evolution often turned on the question of whether a million monkeys could accidentally type Hamlet in a given amount of time.

Do you need «proof» that Christians post on articles about evolution, even though they don't belive it.

On one hand you talk about an idea «evolution,» and on the other hand you are talking about matter «clump of cells.&raquOn one hand you talk about an idea «evolution,» and on the other hand you are talking about matter «clump of cells.&raquon the other hand you are talking about matter «clump of cells.»

He's griping about science being taught that's supposedly out of date and he is way out of date on evolution theory.

Second — your comment: The fossil record shows a consistent and worldwide evolution of life on Earth dating back to about 3,500,000,000 years ago.

Reading some of the ignorant comments on here about science does make it hard to accept evolution, because so many comments here don't evidence evolution.

Creationists» beliefs about the origins of the Earth are often a narrow focus, based in large part on religious beliefs, and while they reject evolution as «just one theory,» they often embrace other fields of science and technology.

well for starters he started work on his idea of natural selection before he even met his wife, let alone lost any kids so you are off to a shaky start before you even try to claim anything else about evolution.

There is NO serious debate within the scientific community about whether or not evolution is real, just differing opinions on how it works.

To get a further sense of the American debate on evolution, this year we surveyed deans at theological seminaries about their schools» approach to the topic.

Taboos vary by culture becuase religions develop based on the laws of darwinian evolution in that different environments bring about different religions.

At one point as we dwell in the past we might find a point in our evolution where something put us on the path of where we are today or created us out of nowhere but until then creationism is simply a dream wished up by those who refuse to be more open minded about the universe we live in.

The full passage shows that Whitehead is basing his claim about the inconsistency of materialism and evolution on the grounds that materialism presupposes a doctrine of external relations and that this doctrine is inadequate to the development of more from less complex organisms.

Evolution is all about procreation and passing on of traits beneficial to survival.

But please do go on tell me more about how evolution is in fact «false», disprove genetic evidence, paleontological evidence, anatomical evidence, evidence from cell biology, virology, zoology, mycology, should I keep going?

In 1850, in In Memoriam, Tennyson expressed perplexity about the ancient earth and evolution, before On the Origin of Species was published in 1859: «Are God and Nature then at strife, / That Nature lends such evil dreams?»

I have a feeling that the evolution debate might be our generation's Galilean controversy, which is why I am wary of making sweeping pronouncements about God being on one side or the other.