Sentences with phrase «about your legal problem so»

You get someone who will lose sleep worrying about your legal problem so you can finally get some rest.

Not exact matches

Ministers have told so many lies about the Strasbourg courts they now have to make the solution to this imaginary problem fit a very real legal and constitutional landscape.

Gromack left the residents with an answer of «I didn't know about any of this (re: Savino's supposed legal problems), so I have no comments.»

I know people are going to moan about piracy, but the real problem in Russia is that the technology comes, is embraced, but no one's set up a legal market and dealt with all the trademarks, copyrights, and patents deals that involves, so black markets spring up.

Another potential reason to limit is the legal HCE limit (HCE = Highly Compensated Employee)- companies with broad income spreads might have the problem that the higher earners save a lot (because they can or because they are better educated about it), and the distribution becomes so uneven that the HCE laws get them in trouble.

It's factual and if there's any legal problems about it I'll go to court as someone who has studied music so I can prove they are shite.»

In other words, they have been told the legal industry is ripe for disruption, so they go find something about law practice that does not make sense to them, and then they build a «solution» to what they perceive to be a problem.

Another reason for scholars to explore the sorts of topics addressed in this essay is that doing so might help us get a better handle on a deeper problem inherent in making predictions about anything related to legal decision - making.

On our podcast today we have two guests: Barbara Captijn, a consumer advocate, who describes how the LAT process represents a deeper problem inside the tribunal system where so many people come without legal representation; and Andy Szabo, who speaks about his eight year experience appearing self - represented at the LAT.

I mean it's this interesting dynamic that we've talked about on the show before where there's for sure the distinction between access to justice and access to lawyers, and that you can have your legal problem or your life problem with legal implications solved without necessarily needing to engage a lawyer, so not all access to justice problems are access to lawyer problems.

Behind the scenes, this programmed with a series of questions, there's a logic tree, so depending on what the person's legal problem is, it'll ask a series of questions and those are all vetted with legal aid lawyers, and also ask questions about their income and where they live, which they can answer not, but answering those questions will, at the end of that, I don't know if you followed it out to the end, but it produces a little customized page of, «These are resources you should be looking at.

So how should we start thinking about that when we think about the construction of the legal system and how to solve that problem?

LAG would suggest that, if the government is serious about access to justice it needs to put back capacity into the system so that these people can get early advice on their legal problems.

You can make one, but it's no substitute and it's completely backwards to start with a persona but it's no substitute for actually knowing and having deep knowledge about the kinds of legal solutions that you want to provide and the problems that those are solutions to, so I don't know.

The national Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters notes in its final report that only about 6.5 % of legal problems ever make it to court, but it is unlikely in the extreme that so many of the people with high school diplomas or less are bundled into the 93.5 % who manage to resolve their legal issues outside of court, especially when we know that for people with low incomes, legal issues tend not come one at a time but cluster and multiply into other areas of the law.

Sam Glover: You talked about analyzing legal issues from TV shows, for example, which some lawyers do that and I wonder if that is helpful in sort of branding and raising your profile, but I wonder about it in terms of search engine optimization because people aren't searching for those kinds of legal problems and the kinds of people that come across your post if it goes viral, I mean it sounds awesome to get thousands or hundreds of thousands of hits on a post, but those aren't clients so I wonder how you think about stuff like that, you know kind of going for publicity seeking posts?

In the meantime, the court may decide whether to allow the agreement to stand or not so you could be stuck with that bad agreement for at least several months and then pay a lot of money for a trial when you could have avoided that whole problem to begin with by hiring a lawyer to give you independent legal advice about your agreement draft.

Legal AI has been so successful already because the bigger story is always one about positive change, the one about using technology to solve problems, deliver value, open up new areas of insight and capability, as well as to boost productivity, not just in the law, but across the entire economy.

For instance, one might expect comments: 1) identifying ethical problems in legal scholarship that are given too little attention; 2) identifying the most important or urgent ethical problems in legal scholarship, even if they are already given attention; 3) asking questions about the definition of «scholarship» or «legal scholarship,» what counts as legal scholarship, and what kinds of norms, if any, should apply to writing by law professors as law professors but outside scholarly forums, such as tweets, blog posts, «law professors» letters,» op - eds, and so on; 4) proposing specific ethical norms for legal scholarship, especially those that might, as it were, be part of a Restatement or code of the ethics of legal scholarship; and 5) raising general questions, positive or critical, about what the conference should try to achieve or whether it is possible to achieve anything at all.

Therefore we see for example, LSUC embracing apps, with no assessment as to: (1) their relation to, and impact upon solving the problem; (2) their ability to bring about the economies - of - scale so badly needed in the production of legal services; (3) their ability to serve and sustain the continued existence of the general practitioner; (4) the prevalence (frequency and availability) of the solicitor - client relationship among all of the many and fast - moving developments in the provision of legal services; and, (5) the issues set out above.

Many legal problems can result from the revocation of a counter-offer, so you should seek professional advice about the correct procedure to follow.

Many legal problems can result from the revocation of an offer, so you should seek professional advice about the correct procedure to follow.

If so, even legal tenants present a problem you should know about before you take on the building.