You will forever be damaged with your closed minded beliefs, and unfortunately you will spend the rest of your pathetic life harassing others
about your nonsense believing that youre «doing the right thing» when in reality your just being annoying.
Not exact matches
He is
believing the
nonsense about shale breakeven costs without understanding there is a lot of misinformation in this area.
If you
believe, like me, that baptizing the dead is
nonsense then don't worry
about it.
You said, «You through your own decisions have effectively limited your options this is religious, this is
believing in a god «YOURSELF»» My decision to question illogical positions and refusing to
believe the blatant
nonsense about imaginary friends has expanded my options.
You have to be smoking Obama's old crack pipe to
believe in this media
nonsense about an «Arab Spring.»
If you actually
believed all that
nonsense about God and spirit and Christians wanting to please God and perfect themselves you wouldn't try to justify your poor behavior as a Christian by comparing it to that of an atheist.
The majority of christians have no idea
about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout
nonsense from a bible they have never read and judge or even hate others who do not
believe their beliefs, all the while not knowing they are going against its teachings.
Yes, religion is a form of insanity / delusion when people continue to
believe this childish
nonsense about a big guy in the sky and some schizophrenic rabbi they
believe came back from the dead and refuse the real world all around.
I can't
believe I actually swallowed all that
nonsense about old men living on clouds!»
Usually, even a non-Christian knows something
about the earth, the heavens, and other elements of the world... Now it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an unbeliever to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking
nonsense on these topics... How are they going to
believe these books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven?
So, CNN, why do people who
believe in
nonsense of this magnitude get a space to talk
about it unchallenged?
A man walked up to a scientist and said «I am a big fan, I love what you do, and I don't
believe in that
nonsense about God!»
How
about if we use our schools and the money that they consume to teach academic and scientific subjects, not a bunch of make -
believe religious
nonsense?
But Nagel (1970, pp. 217 - 218)
believes that «a thought has no location at all»; Feigi (1967, p. 39) writes: «it is simply
nonsense to ask
about the location of a concept»; and Polten (1973, p. 55) even pretends «that physiologists certainly have not shown any necessary connection of memory with brain tissues and it is arguable that it can not be done in principle.»
I remember this preaching
nonsense... I remember asking a reasonable question of a priest as a child of
about 10, and was told «either you
believe everything or you
believe nothing».
Talk
about a massive amount of ignorance and Pat is right when he stated that you'll lose more young people in the church if people continue to
believe such
nonsense.
Sad to say, but we'd probably be better off if the xtians that
believe that
nonsense also
believed the part
about stoning their children to death.
Perry is using religion as a stamp of approval to get votes from «believers» who are: 1) gullible enough to
believe this
nonsense about hearing directly from God; and 2) those stupid enough to accept that religious beliefs along qualify a person to run a country.
We
believed the same
nonsense you
believed in, professed it, preached, witnessed
about it, and depended on it.
@The Irony — telling ppl what they
believe is
nonsense then going on to talk
about what you
believe is right is very ironic.
«It is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking
nonsense on these topics [of cosmology]... If [non-Christians] find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions
about our books, how are they going to
believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason?
Our only world class player is
about to sign for a rival, we are watching the same old transfer negotiations
nonsense we have to go through every year again, and the solution is to «
believe»???
enough
about such trivial
nonsense... does anyone truly
believe that Sanchez isn't fit enough to play?
this article typifies everything that is wrong with our club... if you had any balls you would have started with that Mertz
nonsense, but instead, like Wenger, you started out pretending to be a rational individual only to reveal your true unintelligible in the final paragraph... I feel like you have never watched Mertz play except for in the FA Cup final last year... how does someone help defend corners, crosses and the like when you can't man - mark, you have a negative vertical and you close your eyes whenever the ball comes in your direction... this was a panic buy that didn't make sense then, considering how most teams were setup to counterattack us, and it makes even less sense now... he was well past his prime when he arrived, like Podolski, Arteta, Flamini 2.0 among numerous others, and was used by Wenger to trick the uninformed fans into
believing he cared
about turning this team into a true contender
It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this
nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly
about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak
about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you
believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?
3) Could not
believe how Joanna was talking
nonsense about the decision in the post fight presser... I scored it 48 - 47 not the 49 - 46 judges gave, but it was a clear 48 - 47 for me, 3 rounds for Rose, 2 rounds for Joanna.
If Patterson really
believed his
nonsense about «financial burdens» and «roll out of electronic voting» than he could have scheduled the Special Election in September and given residents of NY - 29 almost an extra 2 months of representation in Washington.
After the nativist bludgeoning of the last 12 months, with all the mean - spirited
nonsense about the somewheres versus the anywheres, people who
believed in a kind, open society felt hope.
It's all
about you liberating yourself from the internal
nonsense that has us
believing that a number on a scale or the food we eat has this huge importance.
I still don't
believe this rear - biased four - wheel - drive
nonsense that Audi goes on
about: the RS4 may be the best - balanced, least - understeering car it has produced since the early 1980s, but it still feels no more rear - biased than Brigitte Nielsen leaning over a low guardrail.
Don't
believe this
nonsense about Toyota not being the best!
What happens when the science teachers themselves disbelieve the science (or, rather,
believe the
nonsense about the science)?
The interesting thing
about these so - called intellectuals is that they actually
believe their
nonsense.
People disposed to
believe their respective
nonsense say exactly the same «nice, thoughtful, earnest» thing
about Pat Michaels, or Judith Curry, or Dick Lindzen.
Wegman
believed a lot of
nonsense about AGW: he testified that CO2 is heavy and thus concentrates near the ground, and that a 2 degree global temp increase would not be significant because the temperature changes that much every day!