Sentences with phrase «above as the argument»

Not exact matches

Your argument is neither «winning», nor even valid, as the comments above clearly show.

In this sense the above argument can be interpreted as an argument for the coherence of classical theism.

Gary, As stated above, this is an old outdated argument concerning the moral code versus the civil code.

As noted above, the defining purpose of moral discourse is to determine through argument the validity or invalidity of contested moral claims.

But as explained above, your argument is wrong anyway.

Just proves atheists babble vainly most of the time and more so when they FAIL an argument or FAIL to see reason as is the case above.

The above conversations exist as testament to this fact and argument is futile.

On reflection we can see that the above argument for the internal relatedness of God as cognitive subject presupposes that there are alternative possibilities for God, at least with respect to what creatures, or what states of creatures, He has as objects of knowledge.

Your perception of me being defensive is innacurate as well, I'm simply pointing out that many are attacking people rather than being respectful, i used the examples above to explain my argument.

The argument, as outlined above, therefore collapses and we are left with the striking fact that the later the Gospel the more elaborate becomes the story of the empty tomb, 9 a phenomenon which is perfectly consistent with a developing and expanding tradition, but one which is inconsistent with eye - witness accounts, where one expects more detail and more reliability the nearer one is in time to the event being described.

The query should include the elements of the cover letter described above as well as a description of how the argument will be made and links to and / or files of already published articles if available.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

In sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of life.

Infidelity — same as above, but a bit more interesting, given the arguments presented.

If you exclude the additional items above, as seems to be the case in many arguments on this blog, then science is incomplete in defining the Universe / God, and their absence is the difference.

The Israelites wrote as ancient people, and their argument for why Yahweh is above all the others gods (see, for example, Psalm 95) only worked because of the shared mythic categories between Israel and her neighbors.»

(Again false as just illustrated above and again attacking me personally rather than my argument) None of these have anything to do with the point of discussion in this thread.

But such arguments fail to recognize that Scripture treats most of the sexual mores mentioned above as moral, not cultic, issues.

The argument against free trade above is made in the name of community against undifferentiated consumption of goods and services as the sole end of economic activity.

As demonstrated above your points of argument were senseless, while you made false claims about what Wenger said.

That was my argument on several articles relating to the Swansea loss, its a fact that finishing second above United City and Liverpool is a statement and crowd pleaser both of wich are needed both to progress and also to look good and show improvement its as simple as that!!

It boils down to this, if we only buy in one key player per season we are NEVER going to be able to compete with the elite clubs and despite there being a few good points in your argument above its worth noting that only 11 million was spent last summer when it was as clear as the noses on anyones face that we needed a better spine up the middle of the pitch, AW has offered and given Theo a new contract at twice the wages he was on and he is without doubt the highest paid flop in the team.

The financial arguments for keeping him are well laid out in the article above and LFC would still be able to take the same benefits as outlined by Andy Wales even if he never plays another first team game for LFC.

Not that I disagree with the main argument, but the above interpretations of snippets from that article are so out of context as to be misleading.

One of the main arguments of the book, as noted above, is that GCC states are not much different from other states and many of the developments they experience are similar to developments of Western states and are beyond Islam and oil.

Leaving aside the argument that that role may already be played by the VAT, there are some difficulties with this, arising from the fact shown above that the profits margins that business make differ between sectors and indeed between businesses of different sizes, as economies of scale can apply.

I would argue, even ignoring all the other arguments above, that if this was the entirety of the issue with marijuana it should be made legal on the grounds that freedom of choice, even bad choices, should be favored if the harm is minor enough; as shown by our legalizing of other equally or more addictive drugs.

The above reference is to buttress my argument that the interpretation of constitution should be done in such a way that not only the laws fit together but also which of the overarching principles provide the glue to keep them together as I will attempt to do with the relevant sections of the 1992 Constitution.

The aim was to present the pro-AV side of the argument as a movement for change that was ethical, young, grassroots - based and above politics.

Can you at least point to a specific argument from the crowd that you take to be very strong in promoting the healthfulness of pastured animal foods as being far above non-pastured?

As I said above, I think we have an issue where we don't communicate very well and that leads to a feature of Match.com creating lots of arguments!

I've always found this argument a bit silly, since it's not as if any of the filmmakers listed above are long past their prime, or could credibly be dismissed as artistic deadweight.

As seen in the two - minute clip above, the couple is engaged in an argument over what is more important, which is loyalty to each other or to Wakanda.

The argument goes, «If the students weren't required to take anything above algebra, they wouldn't drop out as often.»

Scalia, as mentioned above, sometimes seemed to accept this argument and agreed that the original understanding of the equal protection clause could not justify the outcome in Brown.

A study by University of Pennsylvania researchers, which has been used to counter arguments that America's public education system is not working as well as it should, found that the U.S. was generally a bit above average when compared with other industrialized nations and in the middle in the important subjects of math and science.

Teachers were similarly persuaded most by the engagement / love of learning argument above, as well as by the idea that real - world projects help students see greater relevance and purpose in their learning.

``... It is simply outrageous that members of Congress would put an ideological argument above the important work the FAA does... And how, as our nation sluggishly continues to try to recover from the recession, can you throw 4,000 FAA employees, and an unknown number of contractors, out of work?

Again, as Graham mentions above, the hybrid version of the RX carries a hefty price premium over the normal gas model, so the cost savings at the gas pump argument may not ring true until years down the road.

I'm also not perfect but were I writing an argument to present to the public as Michael Kozlowski did above, and not just a reply to someone who replied, I would make sure to edit something like «an writer.»

As was mentioned above, paper topic can give you an excellent hint on applicability of argument - led approach in this case.

All the same arguments as explained in detail in the UTCCR section above apply here including; customers can't opt out; it's an unfair cross subsidy; the effect of charges on vulnerable customers; the fact charges are designed to snare, the lack of competition; the incomprehensible nature of charges; and the difficulties they create for money management.

As noted above, the main argument was over what the rule should be.

How ever I also do think your going in the right direction with your investing skills, because as a counter argument using the same info as above, i can also conclude you're moving in the «right» direction and show improvements in what you want to achieve.

While there are no bright line answers to a question with many dimensions, for most intents and purposes the above «common sense» arguments are wrong, and the Fed Model is fallacious as a tool for long - term investors.»

For those who value gameplay above all else it's probably one to skip, but if you're seeking something more story and emotion driven then Last Day of June is for you, and makes a compelling argument for why games can be as much art as anything else.

I'm sure most of you have played Sonic Adventure and have read the above arguments several times, but you've already made your own judgement about the game as a whole.

Now today, 2018 is critical and the next couple of years as well are far above «truly critical» tipping point of no return — that «battle / argument» has already been lost with the most likely outcome being inaction, denial and ongoing minimisation by those with the only institutional political power to engender change leaving nothing much more and a reliance on a forlorn unrealistic impractical hope» alone.

That argument fails also, as long as we make assumption # 3 above, that UP temperatures are determined by CO2 and other moieties that will act in the same direction.

But this does not at all matter for the argument, and in fact once you get above the stratosphere or so the air is so thin as to have a negligible impact on planetary energy balance.