Sentences with phrase «above zero»

The amount of income could push above the zero percent capital gain rate into the 15 % bracket.

-- remuneration sharing means that while a zero per cent commission sharing offer is not acceptable for posting on MLS, «any offer of remuneration sharing above zero should be posted», adding that «boards and CREA can not set the amount of remuneration sharing»; and

Largely due to the fact that CREA's amendments have set no specific listing rate above zero, those concerns have lessened, although CREA's position has yet to be tested legally.

In the case of limiting long - term illness, there was no clear increase in prevalence with higher family adversity score, although any score above zero was associated with a greater risk of limiting long - term illness compared to children with no family adversity.

Figure 1 contains a histogram, plotted by Mark Lipsey, showing the number of family therapy evaluations demonstrating various effect sizes.33 Although a number of evaluations found negative effects, the average for all is well above zero.

What's more, with central bank interest rates at zero or just above zero, the risk of inflation has risen to an all time high.

«There are enough of us «nuts» to keep the price well above zero, even if all the whales dump.

It found that most law firms barely get above zero which in net promoter score world means your clients are not happy.

This tends to move into the realm of the statement that «all matter always radiates when above zero Kelvin» type of statement.

Let me try again, «all matter will always radiate energy if its temperature is above zero Kelvin AND all matter «visible» to the said matter and in all directions is not at exactly the same temperature».

All numbers above zero represent an increase in the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration.

Perhaps Eli might introduce the Masupial - McKitrick null hypothesis that the trend has not been greater that oh, 0.025 K / yr, Since the measured trends have pretty much all been ABOVE zero, the Marsupial - McKitrick null hypothesis can not be rejected for longer than the raw McKitrick and global warming is out of control.

How are we going to see much more days with surface temperature above zero centigrade there?

1) As I mentioned on May 29, 2011 at 1:37 pm: «If it is correct that all objects that have a temperature above Zero Kelvin (0K) must emit energy by radiation, then why do Nitrogen, Oxygen and Argon not radiate anything at all towards the Earth's surface?»

Tesla and Milankovich did know that; ice starts melting on one degree C above zero.

In the permafrost zones, a layer melts in the summer, when the temperature rises above zero.

The Arctic smashed through earlier heat records over this last winter — with temperatures at the North Pole hovering above zero degrees Celsius at the end of last year.

-- but the fact is that any discount rate (above zero) is going to discount what happens 10,000 years from now.

JimD «warmer» is not meant to infer that all temperatures must be above zero, only that more moisture in sub-zero areas (eg near both poles) will result in more snow.

An analysis of the residuals between the models and the data would probably show a skewed distribution that's most likely centered above zero due to the «warm bias» built into the models.

Derived demand even in a sluggish economy will ensure the CO2 price is above zero.

What would be the freaking point of trumpeting a 97 % consensus that humans were causing some unspecified amount of warming that could be anything between just above zero and 100 %?

Bottom water temperature is usually close to or above zero.

Also shown is the Niño 3.4 SST index (green)(left axis); values substantially above the zero line indicate El Niño conditions while La Niña conditions correspond to the low values.

I'm puzzled as to why for 1996, POGA - H lies below HIST in the POGA - H vs HIST graph, but above zero in the POGA - H minus HIST graph?

But every pdf in Figure 9.20 goes hard to zero at or (usually) 0.5 - 1C above zero — this is clearly not just an artifact of the IPCC having cut its composite chart off at zero.

Gudmandsen notes that temperatures in the area have been above zero since mid-June (week 24) and as a result there is appreciable surface melting north of the ice bridge.

In rereading my own comments, it occurs to me that I should have emphasized changing upper bound priors in the downward rather than upward direction, if we are confining lower bound priors to be above zero rather than lower — we should shrink the range from both ends.

If you used 1880 to 1909 as the base years for a global temperature anomaly graph, most of the data would be above zero.

The statistical correlation between CO2 and acceleration level is barely above zero - an indicator that the agenda - driven myth has absolutely no empirical legs, so - to - speak.

This was in December, the sun was below the horizon all day around, the sky was more or less clear, but still the temperature in Longyearbyen was above zero!

Heat it above zero deg C and it becomes a liquid and continues to emit a continuum thermal radiation with a roughly black body spectrum and Stefan Boltzmann output.

It is not refreezing quickly because air temperatures are above zero confirmed by @dmidk's weather station #KapMorrisJesup.

Clearly high Arctic Summer surface temperatures just above zero are not really an indication of anything except proximity to a melting ice surface.

In the Arctic Summer when the surface ice is melting, it is known that the air temperature close to the surface is limited by this ice melt temperature to just above zero degrees C, (Rigor 2000).

However, process engineers building electronic circuits, who invented feedback mathematics, tell us any loop gain much above zero is far too near the singularity — at a loop gain of 1 — in the feedback - amplification function.

In the absence of supporting data, the default belief level for complex consistent (non-self-contradictory) propositions about the real world is infinitesimally above zero — they can not be said to be false, but nobody sensible would state that they are probably true without evidence.

This has never happened before because the sea ice never retreated very much in the summer and the water temperature could not rise above zero because of the ice cover... The permafrost is acting as a cap for a very large amount of methane (CH4), which is sitting in the sediments underneath in the form of methane hydrates.

Values above zero represent sources of CO2 — from fossil fuels and land use — while values below zero represent sinks of CO2, where the sources of CO2 end up.

When the core temperature of the Earth is in the order of 5,500 C and the space surrounding Earth is at a temperature 2.6 C deg above zero abs there is a Thermodynamic Imperative.

The group developed a proposal later adopted by the WG, which states that by 2050, annual CO2 emissions derived from Earth System Models following RCP2.6, a mitigation scenario, are smaller than 1990 emissions, and that by the end of the 21st century, about half of the models infer emissions slightly above zero, while the other half infer a net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere.

But if a country sets a reasonable or somewhat cautious cap from the start, or corrects it quickly when it sees it is too weak, its may never need to set a floor price above zero.

Note that the green line (moving 365 - day mean of the anomaly) is all above zero — and that the red line (cumulative) is monotonically increasing.

Indeed, the two dataset plots reveal zero relationship with a correlation that produces a r2 barely above zero.

The moon, for example, is much cooler than the Earth, but as you noted, it radiates energy because it's temperature is above zero K. Certainly you are not suggesting that the Earth has some «smart shield» around it that redirects the radiation from the moon, but lets the sun's radiation in.

All materials above zero Kelvin radiate energy, yes, but energy does not flow from a cold body to a warm one and cause its temperature to rise.

There are 45 years of above zero temperature displayed by the chart.

For the GISS data you have 1880 about 0.1 C above zero in 1880.

«gbaike, ice» STARTS» to melt on temp of 1C above zero!

If it gets above zero for few hours in a year — there is a lot of ice to keep itself cool.