They refuse to make
absolute claims like a fetus is not a human being / person, and people have an absolute right to terminate a pregnancy.
Not exact matches
An
absolute coward — just
like Romney and Santorum who dismissed the incivility by
claiming rush is an «entertainer» and by stating that those were not the words he would have chosen.
In modern secular Britain - indeed, in the modern secular West - any
claim that there is anything
like a real and
absolute Truth is viewed with suspicion at the very least and most of the time with a sustained antagonism.
but ARE
claimed to be
absolute... so when they are wrong, people assert things
like «god's sovereignty» to continue and justify their immoral behavior.
The unlimited freedom of everybody to
claim absolute freedom for everything works
like a sort of secret brain - washing by anonymous powers which does not necessarily abolish freedom but narrows in advance the sphere in which the individual can make his free decision.
Some
like ibn al Hazm
claimed that God's autonomy was
absolute: He need not be true even to His own promises.
Yet your
claims are made to sound
like absolute fact.
Since we don't know what the actual discounting ability that remains is, I can't make any
absolute claims, but «some discounting» definitely doesn't sound
like what Amazon is used to doing with its wholesale model.
It seems to me
like you might be using a translator or making translations into English yourself... Maybe you just don't realise that the way you're wording things is very direct and
absolute in terms the individual traits you
claim each of these breeds to possess.
It is a world
claiming absolute authority,
like the open book merged with its pedestal after a huge Bible or Koran.
I would also
like to say that your
claim that «the estimates of the global mean
absolute temperature are not as accurate as the year to year changes» is at the very least counterintuitive.
To illustrate, this means statements made in court, including court documents
like the Statement of
Claim by which a sexual abuse plaintiff starts a lawsuit, are protected by
absolute privilege.
In dismissing Ms. Raczynska's plea for leniency, Justice Graesser explained, «Rule 3.15 provides a deadline which is essentially «
absolute», just
like the time requirements for issuing a statement of
claim under the Limitations Act» (at para 65).
Statements of
claim are privileged; through this
claim, Ghomeshi,
like any litigant, can get anything he wishes onto the public record with
absolute legal impunity.