Sentences with phrase «absolute equality of»

Dr Swift met some serious opposition to his critique of parenting excesses, including a passionate defence of the private school system and fears of totalitarianism should absolute equality of opportunity be enforced.

Almost no socialist theorist has argued for the straw man option of absolute equality of outcome.

Though male and female were strictly separated, there was absolute equality of the sexes, even in the ministry.

In any case, the culture and habits of industry, which parents transmit to their children, make absolute equality of opportunity unattainable.

Not exact matches

It also prevents the long arms of absolute equality from dabbling in the insignificant groupings and daily» to do's» of college kids.

Uniformity and absolute equality are the death of all real vigor and freedom in existence.

Thomas Jefferson gave ever lasting gift of human equality to America, a gift from our creator and denied by religions, based not on truth absolute but hinduism, racism,

Adam's eagerness to snatch the prize of equality with God — the desire of Everyman to set himself up in the place of God as absolute master of a world which is really not his own, but God's — is replaced by the second Adam's total self - surrender: his obedience to the point of accepting the death of the Cross; death which paradoxically leads to life, whereas the consequence of Adam's self - glorification proved to be death.

How do we know God isn't punishing us because we have allowed absolute equality instead of having the courage to follow its teachings?

Convention of hindu's ignorant s, conserving not truth absolute enshrined in foundation of America principal of human equality but followers of hinduism, racism by faith, in human and un American, utter hindu's, idiots or hindu Magi's, criminal tricksters, selling hinduism, slavery for American on name of freedom in following of hindu Judaism, filthy secularism, but claiming to be following truth to hind, fool Americans.

Does not such development presuppose, if not relative equality, at least the abolition of absolute poverty amongst the masses of the poor in the world?

Furthermore, death is decisive in its absolute certainty and equality: not only does it come to all, but it makes all equal, obliterating the distinctions that we make so much of in life.

Western culture may be compared to a lake fed by the stream of Hellenism, Christianity, science, and these contributions might offer an extremely valuable way of considering the conceptions of a life of reason, the principle of an ordered and intelligible world, the ideas of faith, of a personal God, of the absolute value of the human individual, the method of observation and experiment, and the conception of empirical laws, as well as the doctrines of equality and of the brotherhood of man.

The only applicable universal, absolute truth — the truth of equality — is beyond question.

This is because in the pursuit of absolute equality in every test taker's «experience» of the test, these criteria exclude potentially upsetting passages and any other material that creates disparity, including content that rewards those with greater background knowledge.

I am hoping that the court «s role in this case will strike at the very existence of an absolute immunity under two guiding principles: equality under the law (especially when the alleged wrong has been committed by a person who should be held to the highest standards of conduct in exercising a public trust; and any infringement of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms constitutes «improper purpose» aimed at gaining a private collateral advantage.

This controversial decision of the BC Supreme Court held that the absolute prohibitions against assisted suicide in the Criminal Code violated sections 7 and 15 of the Charter (the Charter right to «life, liberty and security of the person» and the Charter guarantee of equality, respectively).

However, if the guiding principle of justice: equality is absolute; than doesn't candour fit squarely into distributive justice as a matter of comparative treatments of individuals?

Judge Tanaka of the International Court of Justice stated, in the South West Africa case, that «The principle of equality before the law does not mean the absolute equality, namely the equal treatment of men without regard to the individual, concrete circumstances, but it means the relative equality, namely the principles to treat equally what are equal and unequally what are unequal... To treat unequal matters differently according to their inequality is not only permitted but required», (1966) ICJ Rep 6, pp303 - 305.

The principle of equality before the law does not mean the absolute equality, namely the equal treatment of men without regard to individual, concrete circumstances, but it means the relative equality, namely the principle to treat equally what are equal and unequally what are unequal... To treat unequal matters differently according to their inequality is not only permitted but required.