Not exact matches
[21] The
immunity from civil or criminal
liability is wide and
absolute [22] and members of the legislatures and Parliament who make statements knowing that they are untrue are as protected as much as a member who acts «honestly and responsibly.»
They said «it is now clear that the
absolute immunity of its policymakers does not shield a city
from liability for its policies.»
So it is now clear that the
absolute immunity of its policymakers does not shield a city
from liability for its policies.
Traditionally, such attempts have been roundly rebutted by invoking
absolute judicial
immunity, which protects those involved in proceedings (or in their preparation)
from liability.
To clarify, plea bargaining does not constitute extortion and prosecutors have
absolute immunity from criminal or civil
liability for their official acts in prosecuting cases.
The function of
absolute immunity in the performance of judicial duties is not to shield members of the judiciary
from liability for their own misconduct, but rather «to protect their offices
from the deterrent effect of suit alleging improper motives where there has been no more than a mistake or a disagreement on the part of the complaining party with the decision made.»
Individual members of the board, its executive director, and all staff persons assisting them shall have
absolute immunity from civil
liability for all acts undertaken in the course of their official duties pursuant to these rules.
Indeed, «
absolute immunity» for judges and prosecutors is only
immunity from civil
liability and not
from criminal
liability.