Yet despite
the absolute lack of evidence for any of these claims, people still keep clicking on the articles, posting them to Facebook, sharing them with their friends, and worst of all believing that Wi - Fi is some silent killer in their midst quietly nuking their bodies and steering them towards an inevitable bout with cancer.
Will you go farther and admit that given
the absolute lack of evidence for your alleged sky fairies and the period of time mankind has been searching for them, the probability of there being any gods is virtually zero?
Not exact matches
The probability that some deity exists, given the
absolute complete and utter
lack of definitive
evidence would, by any reasonable calculation, be less than one.
500 years
of science never once bending to religion is all the
evidence anyone should ever need to prove the
absolute lack of truth and divinity in monotheism.
I would «base [my] info on inre the non-existence
of God, heaven and hell, etc» on the
absolute lack of even a shred
of hard verifiable
evidence for these extraordinary claims, and the fact that even after thousands
of years
of frantic and determined efforts by the most ardent and intelligent proponents
of these claims, they still have been completely unable to demonstrate them in any testable manner.
For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor
of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively
of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable
evidence, such as the fact that a
lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level
of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an
absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex
of events (not
of enduring substances).
@ Moby, If you don't believe in angels based on the
evidence or the
lack thereof that's fine, but if you're claiming that the nonexistence
of angels to be the
absolute truth then you better provide the proof.
The researchers found that three sites
lack absolute age control: at Chobot, Alberta, the three Clovis points found
lack stratigraphic context, and the majority
of other diagnostic artifacts are younger than Clovis by thousands
of years; at Morley, Alberta, ridges are assumed without
evidence to be chronologically correlated with Ice Age hills 2,600 kilometers away; and at Paw Paw Cove, Maryland, horizontal integrity
of the Clovis artifacts found is compromised, according to that site's principal archaeologist.