A bill in Congress introduced by Rep. John Faso, R - Kinderhook, would address this by changing
the absolute liability standard, which mandates that employers are on the hook for injuries, regardless of worker negligence, by allowing projects receiving federal funds to be exempt.
Not exact matches
There is no evidence that a higher
standard of care results from
absolute liability.
As the Supreme Court famously articulated in R. v. Sault Ste. Marie, some claim that
absolute liability is justified because it is «efficient» and perhaps will ensure «a high
standard of care and attention on the part of those who follow certain pursuits».
It had not found the
standard - issue gloves to be unsuitable and the local authority argued that the claimant was effectively arguing for the imposition of
absolute liability of the employer.